Kinematic and Kinetic Differences Between Ball Rotational Exercises and the Throwing Motion in Collegiate Baseball Athletes.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Joseph A Mylott, Emily M Potts, Jakob H Wolf, Garrett S Bullock, Kristen F Nicholson
{"title":"Kinematic and Kinetic Differences Between Ball Rotational Exercises and the Throwing Motion in Collegiate Baseball Athletes.","authors":"Joseph A Mylott, Emily M Potts, Jakob H Wolf, Garrett S Bullock, Kristen F Nicholson","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Mylott, JA, Potts, EM, Wolf, JH, Bullock, GS, and Nicholson, KF. Kinematic and kinetic differences between ball rotational exercises and the throwing motion in collegiate baseball athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The purpose of this study was to observe the associations that medicine ball pushes and chops have on the lower extremities regarding ground reaction forces (GRF) and lead knee flexion angles and to compare these values with a regular baseball overhead throw. Lower extremity kinetics and kinematics were obtained via force plates and marker motion capture. Subjects (n = 35) included baseball players (age 19.7 ± 1.5 years). Five medicine ball movements of each type along with at least 3 pitches or 5 throws off the mound were recorded for data collection. Statistical parametric mapping, including analysis of variance and 2-way t-tests, was used to compare the variables of interest between the movements for continuous time data. All kinematic and kinetic variables were significantly different (p < 0.05) for some time during the motion between the different trial types of medicine ball exercises and throws. A medicine ball chop can increase peak drive leg GRF, whereas a push can help an athlete keep greater driver leg GRF and maintain ground connection into foot plant. A push helps train lead leg deficiencies in the delivery. Both the medicine ball chop and push have benefits for training lead leg stabilization and extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Mylott, JA, Potts, EM, Wolf, JH, Bullock, GS, and Nicholson, KF. Kinematic and kinetic differences between ball rotational exercises and the throwing motion in collegiate baseball athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The purpose of this study was to observe the associations that medicine ball pushes and chops have on the lower extremities regarding ground reaction forces (GRF) and lead knee flexion angles and to compare these values with a regular baseball overhead throw. Lower extremity kinetics and kinematics were obtained via force plates and marker motion capture. Subjects (n = 35) included baseball players (age 19.7 ± 1.5 years). Five medicine ball movements of each type along with at least 3 pitches or 5 throws off the mound were recorded for data collection. Statistical parametric mapping, including analysis of variance and 2-way t-tests, was used to compare the variables of interest between the movements for continuous time data. All kinematic and kinetic variables were significantly different (p < 0.05) for some time during the motion between the different trial types of medicine ball exercises and throws. A medicine ball chop can increase peak drive leg GRF, whereas a push can help an athlete keep greater driver leg GRF and maintain ground connection into foot plant. A push helps train lead leg deficiencies in the delivery. Both the medicine ball chop and push have benefits for training lead leg stabilization and extension.

大学棒球运动员旋转球练习与投掷动作之间的运动学和动力学差异。
摘要:Mylott、JA、Potts、EM、Wolf、JH、Bullock、GS 和 Nicholson、KF。大学棒球运动员在球旋转练习和投掷动作之间的运动学和动力学差异。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-本研究的目的是观察药球推和劈对下肢地面反作用力(GRF)和膝关节前屈角度的影响,并将这些值与常规棒球高空投掷进行比较。通过力板和标记运动捕捉获得下肢动力学和运动学数据。受试者(n = 35)包括棒球运动员(年龄 19.7 ± 1.5 岁)。每种类型的五次药球运动以及至少 3 次投球或 5 次从投手丘上抛球都被记录下来以收集数据。统计参数映射(包括方差分析和双向 t 检验)用于比较连续时间数据中各动作之间的相关变量。在药球练习和投掷的不同试验类型之间,所有运动学和动力学变量在运动过程中的某些时间段都存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。劈药球可以增加驱动腿GRF峰值,而推举则可以帮助运动员保持更大的驱动腿GRF,并在脚掌着地时保持地面连接。推球有助于训练投掷过程中驱动腿的缺陷。药球劈腿和推举对训练前导腿的稳定和伸展都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信