Pelvic lymph node mapping in prostate cancer: examining the impact of PSMA PET/CT on radiotherapy decision-making in patients with node-positive disease.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ben Furman, Tal Falick Michaeli, Robert Den, Simona Ben Haim, Aron Popovtzer, Marc Wygoda, Philip Blumenfeld
{"title":"Pelvic lymph node mapping in prostate cancer: examining the impact of PSMA PET/CT on radiotherapy decision-making in patients with node-positive disease.","authors":"Ben Furman, Tal Falick Michaeli, Robert Den, Simona Ben Haim, Aron Popovtzer, Marc Wygoda, Philip Blumenfeld","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00742-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) imaging with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) plays a crucial role in prostate cancer management. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on how PSMA PET/CT (Computed Tomography) influences radiotherapeutic decisions, particularly in node-positive prostate cancer cases. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating two primary objectives: (1) Mapping the regional and non-regional lymph nodes (LNs) up to the aortic bifurcation and their distribution using conventional methods with CT compared to PSMA PET/CT, and (2) assessing the impact of PSMA PET/CT findings on radiotherapeutic decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 95 node-positive prostate cancer patients who underwent both CT and PSMA PET/CT imaging prior to primary radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was conducted. The analysis focused on identifying LNs in various regions including the common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator, presacral, mesorectal, inguinal, and other stations. Treatment plans were reviewed for modifications based on PSMA PET/CT findings, and statistical analysis was performed to identify predictors for exclusive nodal positivity on PSMA PET/CT scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMA PET/CT identified additional positive nodes in 48% of cases, resulting in a staging shift from N0 to N1 in 29% of patients. The most frequent metastatic LNs were located in the external iliac (76 LNs; 34%), internal iliac (43 LNs; 19%), and common iliac (35 LNs; 15%) stations. In patients with nodes only detected on PSMA PET the most common nodes were in the external iliac (27, 40%), internal iliac (13, 19%), obturator (11, 15%) stations. Within the subgroup of 28 patients exclusively demonstrating PSMA PET-detected nodes, changes in radiotherapy treatment fields were implemented in 5 cases (18%), and a dose boost was applied for 23 patients (83%). However, no discernible predictors for exclusive nodal positivity on PSMA PET/CT scans emerged from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study underscores the pivotal role of PSMA PET/CT compared to CT alone in accurately staging node-positive prostate cancer and guiding personalized radiotherapy strategies. The routine integration of PSMA PET/CT into diagnostic protocols is advocated to optimize treatment precision and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00742-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) imaging with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) plays a crucial role in prostate cancer management. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on how PSMA PET/CT (Computed Tomography) influences radiotherapeutic decisions, particularly in node-positive prostate cancer cases. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating two primary objectives: (1) Mapping the regional and non-regional lymph nodes (LNs) up to the aortic bifurcation and their distribution using conventional methods with CT compared to PSMA PET/CT, and (2) assessing the impact of PSMA PET/CT findings on radiotherapeutic decisions.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 95 node-positive prostate cancer patients who underwent both CT and PSMA PET/CT imaging prior to primary radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was conducted. The analysis focused on identifying LNs in various regions including the common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator, presacral, mesorectal, inguinal, and other stations. Treatment plans were reviewed for modifications based on PSMA PET/CT findings, and statistical analysis was performed to identify predictors for exclusive nodal positivity on PSMA PET/CT scans.

Results: PSMA PET/CT identified additional positive nodes in 48% of cases, resulting in a staging shift from N0 to N1 in 29% of patients. The most frequent metastatic LNs were located in the external iliac (76 LNs; 34%), internal iliac (43 LNs; 19%), and common iliac (35 LNs; 15%) stations. In patients with nodes only detected on PSMA PET the most common nodes were in the external iliac (27, 40%), internal iliac (13, 19%), obturator (11, 15%) stations. Within the subgroup of 28 patients exclusively demonstrating PSMA PET-detected nodes, changes in radiotherapy treatment fields were implemented in 5 cases (18%), and a dose boost was applied for 23 patients (83%). However, no discernible predictors for exclusive nodal positivity on PSMA PET/CT scans emerged from the analysis.

Discussion: The study underscores the pivotal role of PSMA PET/CT compared to CT alone in accurately staging node-positive prostate cancer and guiding personalized radiotherapy strategies. The routine integration of PSMA PET/CT into diagnostic protocols is advocated to optimize treatment precision and improve patient outcomes.

前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结映射:研究 PSMA PET/CT 对结节阳性患者放疗决策的影响。
前言:前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET)成像在前列腺癌治疗中起着至关重要的作用。然而,关于 PSMA PET/CT(计算机断层扫描)如何影响放射治疗决策,尤其是结节阳性前列腺癌病例的放射治疗决策,目前还缺乏全面的数据。本研究旨在通过评估两个主要目标来填补这一空白:(1) 与 PSMA PET/CT 相比,使用 CT 的传统方法绘制主动脉分叉以内的区域和非区域淋巴结 (LN) 及其分布图;(2) 评估 PSMA PET/CT 发现对放射治疗决策的影响:对 95 例结节阳性前列腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在接受原发性放疗和雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)之前均接受了 CT 和 PSMA PET/CT 成像检查。分析的重点是确定不同区域的 LN,包括髂总、髂外、髂内、钝肌、骶前、直肠间、腹股沟和其他部位。根据 PSMA PET/CT 检查结果对治疗方案进行复查以进行修改,并进行统计分析以确定 PSMA PET/CT 扫描中专属结节阳性的预测因素:结果:PSMA PET/CT 在 48% 的病例中发现了额外的阳性结节,导致 29% 的患者的分期从 N0 改为 N1。最常见的转移性结节位于髂外(76 个;34%)、髂内(43 个;19%)和髂总(35 个;15%)。在仅通过 PSMA PET 检测到结节的患者中,最常见的结节位于髂外站(27 个,占 40%)、髂内站(13 个,占 19%)和髂总站(11 个,占 15%)。在完全显示 PSMA PET 检测到结节的 28 例患者中,有 5 例患者(18%)改变了放疗治疗野,23 例患者(83%)增加了剂量。然而,分析结果显示,PSMA PET/CT 扫描显示结节阳性的预测因素并不明显:讨论:该研究强调了 PSMA PET/CT 与单纯 CT 相比在对结节阳性前列腺癌进行准确分期和指导个性化放疗策略方面的关键作用。我们提倡将 PSMA PET/CT 常规纳入诊断方案,以优化治疗精确度并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信