Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Conduct and Results of CLEAR Outcomes Trial

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Abhayjit Singh, Luke J. Laffin, Ashish Sarraju, A. Michael Lincoff, Stephen J. Nicholls, LeAnne Bloedon, William J. Sasiela, Na Li, Paula Robinson, Stephanie Kelly, Denise Mason, Steven E. Nissen
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Conduct and Results of CLEAR Outcomes Trial","authors":"Abhayjit Singh,&nbsp;Luke J. Laffin,&nbsp;Ashish Sarraju,&nbsp;A. Michael Lincoff,&nbsp;Stephen J. Nicholls,&nbsp;LeAnne Bloedon,&nbsp;William J. Sasiela,&nbsp;Na Li,&nbsp;Paula Robinson,&nbsp;Stephanie Kelly,&nbsp;Denise Mason,&nbsp;Steven E. Nissen","doi":"10.1002/clc.24328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical research. CLEAR Outcomes investigated the effect of bempedoic acid (BA) versus placebo in 13 970 patients with statin intolerance and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. BA reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) by 13%. CLEAR Outcomes began before and continued for 2.7 years after the start of the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient disposition, adverse events, and major adverse CV events (MACE) in CLEAR Outcomes was assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Rates of severe infection, hospitalization, or first MACE associated with a positive COVID-19 test were low and balanced between treatment groups. Rates of all-cause death, non-CV death, and undetermined death increased in the pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic period, while rates of CV death with a known etiology remained stable. A sensitivity analysis excluding undetermined deaths occurring after the onset of the pandemic from the CV death designation yielded hazard ratios of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93) for the primary endpoint and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76–1.16) for the secondary endpoint of CV death, compared with 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79–0.96) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.88–1.24), respectively, in the original analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The CLEAR Outcomes trial continued uninterrupted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain trial endpoints may have been impacted by the pandemic. Specifically, the classification of undetermined deaths as CV deaths may have attenuated the effect of BA on key efficacy endpoints.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical research. CLEAR Outcomes investigated the effect of bempedoic acid (BA) versus placebo in 13 970 patients with statin intolerance and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. BA reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization) by 13%. CLEAR Outcomes began before and continued for 2.7 years after the start of the pandemic.

Methods

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient disposition, adverse events, and major adverse CV events (MACE) in CLEAR Outcomes was assessed.

Results

Rates of severe infection, hospitalization, or first MACE associated with a positive COVID-19 test were low and balanced between treatment groups. Rates of all-cause death, non-CV death, and undetermined death increased in the pandemic period compared with the pre-pandemic period, while rates of CV death with a known etiology remained stable. A sensitivity analysis excluding undetermined deaths occurring after the onset of the pandemic from the CV death designation yielded hazard ratios of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93) for the primary endpoint and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76–1.16) for the secondary endpoint of CV death, compared with 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79–0.96) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.88–1.24), respectively, in the original analysis.

Conclusion

The CLEAR Outcomes trial continued uninterrupted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain trial endpoints may have been impacted by the pandemic. Specifically, the classification of undetermined deaths as CV deaths may have attenuated the effect of BA on key efficacy endpoints.

Abstract Image

COVID-19 大流行对 CLEAR 成果试验的开展和结果的影响。
简介COVID-19 大流行扰乱了临床研究。CLEAR Outcomes对13 970名他汀类药物不耐受且心血管(CV)风险较高的患者进行了贝母倍多酸(BA)与安慰剂对比效果的研究。BA将主要终点(心血管疾病死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、非致命性中风或冠状动脉血运重建的复合终点)的风险降低了13%。CLEAR结果在大流行开始前开始,并在大流行开始后持续了2.7年:方法:评估 COVID-19 大流行对 CLEAR 结果中患者处置、不良事件和主要 CV 不良事件 (MACE) 的影响:结果:与 COVID-19 检测阳性相关的严重感染、住院或首次 MACE 的发生率较低,且各治疗组之间的发生率均衡。与大流行前相比,大流行期间全因死亡、非冠状动脉疾病死亡和未确定死亡的比率有所上升,而已知病因的冠状动脉疾病死亡比率保持稳定。一项敏感性分析将大流行开始后发生的未确定死亡排除在冠心病死亡之外,结果显示主要终点的危险比为0.84(95% CI,0.76-0.93),次要终点冠心病死亡的危险比为0.94(95% CI,0.76-1.16),而原始分析的危险比分别为0.87(95% CI,0.79-0.96)和1.04(95% CI,0.88-1.24):结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,CLEAR 结果试验一直在持续进行。某些试验终点可能受到了大流行的影响。具体来说,将未确定的死亡归类为心血管疾病死亡可能会削弱 BA 对关键疗效终点的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信