Real-world impact of ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis and select ivacaftor-responsive mutations.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Craig McKinnon, Teja Thorat, Alexander Craft, Mark Higgins
{"title":"Real-world impact of ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis and select ivacaftor-responsive mutations.","authors":"Craig McKinnon, Teja Thorat, Alexander Craft, Mark Higgins","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ivacaftor approval was extended to people with cystic fibrosis (CF) with ≥1 of 28 additional ivacaftor-responsive mutations in the USA in 2017 based on preclinical in vitro data. This retrospective, observational study assessed real-world clinical response to ivacaftor in people with CF with ≥1 of these mutations, using data from the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged ≥2 years with ≥1 of 28 eligible mutations initiating ivacaftor between May 2017 and December 2018 were included. Clinical outcomes data were evaluated for ≤1 year before and ≤2 years after ivacaftor initiation. Participants initiating ivacaftor between May and December 2017 (2017 cohort) were used for the primary analysis because up to 2 years of post-ivacaftor-initiation data were available. Analyses were descriptive; key outcomes included percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV<sub>1</sub>), body mass index (BMI) and BMI z-score, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) and hospitalisations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1004 eligible participants. In the 2017 cohort (n=613), mean absolute change in ppFEV<sub>1</sub> from pre-ivacaftor initiation was 1.9 (95% CI 1.4, 2.4) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.0, 2.7) percentage points in years 1 and 2 post-ivacaftor initiation, respectively; mean absolute change in BMI was 0.6 (95% CI 0.5, 0.7) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.8, 1.2) kg/m<sup>2</sup> in years 1 and 2, respectively; BMI z-score was unchanged. Annualised event rates of PEx and hospitalisations per patient-year were lower with ivacaftor (0.24 (95% CI 0.21, 0.26) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.25, 0.31), respectively) compared with pre-ivacaftor initiation (0.41 (95% CI 0.37, 0.46) and 0.45 (95% CI 0.41, 0.49), respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These real-world observational study findings support the effectiveness of ivacaftor in people with CF aged ≥2 years with selected <i>CFTR</i> mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ivacaftor approval was extended to people with cystic fibrosis (CF) with ≥1 of 28 additional ivacaftor-responsive mutations in the USA in 2017 based on preclinical in vitro data. This retrospective, observational study assessed real-world clinical response to ivacaftor in people with CF with ≥1 of these mutations, using data from the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry.

Methods: Participants aged ≥2 years with ≥1 of 28 eligible mutations initiating ivacaftor between May 2017 and December 2018 were included. Clinical outcomes data were evaluated for ≤1 year before and ≤2 years after ivacaftor initiation. Participants initiating ivacaftor between May and December 2017 (2017 cohort) were used for the primary analysis because up to 2 years of post-ivacaftor-initiation data were available. Analyses were descriptive; key outcomes included percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI) and BMI z-score, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) and hospitalisations.

Results: The study included 1004 eligible participants. In the 2017 cohort (n=613), mean absolute change in ppFEV1 from pre-ivacaftor initiation was 1.9 (95% CI 1.4, 2.4) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.0, 2.7) percentage points in years 1 and 2 post-ivacaftor initiation, respectively; mean absolute change in BMI was 0.6 (95% CI 0.5, 0.7) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.8, 1.2) kg/m2 in years 1 and 2, respectively; BMI z-score was unchanged. Annualised event rates of PEx and hospitalisations per patient-year were lower with ivacaftor (0.24 (95% CI 0.21, 0.26) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.25, 0.31), respectively) compared with pre-ivacaftor initiation (0.41 (95% CI 0.37, 0.46) and 0.45 (95% CI 0.41, 0.49), respectively).

Conclusions: These real-world observational study findings support the effectiveness of ivacaftor in people with CF aged ≥2 years with selected CFTR mutations.

伊伐卡夫多对囊性纤维化患者和特定伊伐卡夫多反应性突变患者的实际影响。
背景:基于临床前的体外数据,2017年美国将伊伐卡夫多的批准范围扩大至具有28种额外伊伐卡夫多应答突变中≥1种突变的囊性纤维化(CF)患者。这项回顾性观察研究利用美国囊性纤维化基金会患者登记处的数据,评估了≥1个这些突变的CF患者对伊伐卡夫多的真实世界临床反应:纳入2017年5月至2018年12月期间开始使用伊伐卡夫多的年龄≥2岁、28种符合条件的突变中≥1种突变的参与者。对开始使用伊伐卡夫托前≤1年和后≤2年的临床结果数据进行评估。在 2017 年 5 月至 12 月期间开始使用 ivacaftor 的参与者(2017 年队列)被用于主要分析,因为可以获得开始使用 ivacaftor 后长达 2 年的数据。分析为描述性分析;主要结果包括1 s内预测用力呼气容积百分比(ppFEV1)、体重指数(BMI)和BMI z-score、肺部恶化(PEx)和住院情况:研究纳入了 1004 名符合条件的参与者。在 2017 年队列(n=613)中,ppFEV1 的平均绝对值变化与开始使用伊伐卡夫前相比分别为 1.9(95% CI 1.4,2.4)和 1.8(95% CI 1.0,2.在开始使用伊伐卡夫特后的第 1 年和第 2 年,BMI 的平均绝对值变化分别为 0.6(95% CI 0.5,0.7)和 1.0(95% CI 0.8,1.2)kg/m2;BMI z 评分保持不变。与开始使用ivacaftor前(分别为0.41(95% CI 0.37,0.46)和0.45(95% CI 0.41,0.49))相比,使用ivacaftor后每患者每年的PEx年化事件率和住院率较低(分别为0.24(95% CI 0.21,0.26)和0.28(95% CI 0.25,0.31)):这些真实世界的观察性研究结果表明,伊伐卡夫托对年龄≥2岁、有特定CFTR突变的CF患者有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信