Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias and Survival After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002279
Connor P Oates, Luke L Lawrence, Grace E Bigham, Namratha S Meda, Binaya Basyal, Sriram D Rao, Cyrus A Hadadi, Samer S Najjar, Manish H Shah, Farooq H Sheikh, Phillip H Lam
{"title":"Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias and Survival After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.","authors":"Connor P Oates, Luke L Lawrence, Grace E Bigham, Namratha S Meda, Binaya Basyal, Sriram D Rao, Cyrus A Hadadi, Samer S Najjar, Manish H Shah, Farooq H Sheikh, Phillip H Lam","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients receiving durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unclear and there is no consensus regarding postoperative management. We sought to determine the impact of postoperative management of CRT on clinical outcomes following LVAD implantation. A total of 789 patients underwent LVAD implantation at our institution from 2007 to 2022 including 195 patients (24.7%) with preoperative CRT. Patients with preoperative CRT were significantly older and more frequently received an LVAD as destination therapy compared to patients without preoperative CRT. After LVAD implantation, 85 patients had CRT programmed \"off\" and 74 patients had CRT programmed \"on.\" The risk of mortality was significantly increased amongst patients with preoperative CRT that was turned \"on\" following LVAD implantation compared to patients with preoperative CRT turned \"off\" following implant (subdistribution hazard ratio [sdHR] = 1.54; 1.06-2.37 95% confidence interval [CI]; p = 0.036). There was no significant difference between incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without postoperative CRT \"on\" (35.1% vs . 48.2%; p = 0.095). Additional clinical trials are warranted to determine the best CRT programming strategy following LVAD implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients receiving durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unclear and there is no consensus regarding postoperative management. We sought to determine the impact of postoperative management of CRT on clinical outcomes following LVAD implantation. A total of 789 patients underwent LVAD implantation at our institution from 2007 to 2022 including 195 patients (24.7%) with preoperative CRT. Patients with preoperative CRT were significantly older and more frequently received an LVAD as destination therapy compared to patients without preoperative CRT. After LVAD implantation, 85 patients had CRT programmed "off" and 74 patients had CRT programmed "on." The risk of mortality was significantly increased amongst patients with preoperative CRT that was turned "on" following LVAD implantation compared to patients with preoperative CRT turned "off" following implant (subdistribution hazard ratio [sdHR] = 1.54; 1.06-2.37 95% confidence interval [CI]; p = 0.036). There was no significant difference between incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without postoperative CRT "on" (35.1% vs . 48.2%; p = 0.095). Additional clinical trials are warranted to determine the best CRT programming strategy following LVAD implantation.

心脏再同步化疗法对持久性左心室辅助装置植入术后室性心律失常和存活率的影响
心脏再同步化疗法(CRT)对持久性左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入患者的影响仍不明确,术后管理方面也未达成共识。我们试图确定 CRT 术后管理对 LVAD 植入术后临床结果的影响。从 2007 年到 2022 年,共有 789 名患者在我院接受了 LVAD 植入术,其中 195 名患者(24.7%)在术前接受了 CRT。与没有术前CRT的患者相比,有术前CRT的患者年龄明显偏大,并且更多接受LVAD作为目的疗法。植入 LVAD 后,85 名患者的 CRT 程序为 "关闭",74 名患者的 CRT 程序为 "打开"。与植入 LVAD 后术前 CRT 被 "关闭 "的患者相比,植入 LVAD 后术前 CRT 被 "开启 "的患者的死亡风险明显增加(亚分布危险比 [sdHR] = 1.54;1.06-2.37 95% 置信区间 [CI];p = 0.036)。术后 "开启 "CRT 和未 "开启 "CRT 的患者室性心律失常发生率无明显差异(35.1% 对 48.2%;P = 0.095)。有必要进行更多临床试验,以确定 LVAD 植入术后的最佳 CRT 编程策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信