Patterns of Infliximab Biosimilar Uptake for Medicare, Medicaid, and Private Insurance from 2016 to 2022.

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Eric T Roberts, Jing Li, Nick Bansback, Chien-Wen Tseng, Steve Shiboski, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany
{"title":"Patterns of Infliximab Biosimilar Uptake for Medicare, Medicaid, and Private Insurance from 2016 to 2022.","authors":"Eric T Roberts, Jing Li, Nick Bansback, Chien-Wen Tseng, Steve Shiboski, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany","doi":"10.1002/art.42963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biosimilars have the potential to reduce spending on biologic drugs, yet uptake has been slower than anticipated. We investigated how successive introductions of infliximab biosimilars influenced their adoption by major US insurance providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from more than 1,100 US rheumatologists. All infliximab administrations (bio-originator or biosimilar) to patients aged ≥18 years from April 2016 to September 2022 were included. We used an interrupted time series to model the effect of each infliximab biosimilar release (infliximab-dyyb, November 2016; infliximab-adba, July 2017; and infliximab-axxq, July 2020) on uptake across Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the first and second biosimilar releases, biosimilar uptake rose slowly, with average annual increases of ≤5% from 2016 to June 2020 (Medicare 3.2%, Medicaid 5.2%, and private insurance 1.8%). With the third biosimilar release in July 2020, the average annual increase reached 13% for Medicaid and 16.4% for private insurance but remained low for Medicare (5.6%). By September 2022, uptake was higher for Medicaid (43.8%) and private insurance (38.5%) than for Medicare (24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results have two key findings for policy makers. First, our results suggest that one or two biosimilars may not generate enough competition to speed adoption rates for biosimilars. Second, Medicare, which covers most patients receiving biologics nationally, had slow adoption rates even after the third biosimilar was introduced. Policy levers to speed adoption among Medicare beneficiaries are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42963","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Biosimilars have the potential to reduce spending on biologic drugs, yet uptake has been slower than anticipated. We investigated how successive introductions of infliximab biosimilars influenced their adoption by major US insurance providers.

Methods: Data came from the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from more than 1,100 US rheumatologists. All infliximab administrations (bio-originator or biosimilar) to patients aged ≥18 years from April 2016 to September 2022 were included. We used an interrupted time series to model the effect of each infliximab biosimilar release (infliximab-dyyb, November 2016; infliximab-adba, July 2017; and infliximab-axxq, July 2020) on uptake across Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers.

Results: With the first and second biosimilar releases, biosimilar uptake rose slowly, with average annual increases of ≤5% from 2016 to June 2020 (Medicare 3.2%, Medicaid 5.2%, and private insurance 1.8%). With the third biosimilar release in July 2020, the average annual increase reached 13% for Medicaid and 16.4% for private insurance but remained low for Medicare (5.6%). By September 2022, uptake was higher for Medicaid (43.8%) and private insurance (38.5%) than for Medicare (24%).

Conclusion: Our results have two key findings for policy makers. First, our results suggest that one or two biosimilars may not generate enough competition to speed adoption rates for biosimilars. Second, Medicare, which covers most patients receiving biologics nationally, had slow adoption rates even after the third biosimilar was introduced. Policy levers to speed adoption among Medicare beneficiaries are needed.

2016-2022 年医疗保险、医疗补助和私人保险中英夫利西单抗生物仿制药的使用模式。
目的:生物仿制药有可能减少生物药的支出,但其吸收速度比预期的要慢。我们研究了英夫利西单抗生物仿制药的相继问世如何影响美国主要保险公司对其的采用:数据来自 RISE,这是一个全国性注册机构,拥有 1100 多名美国风湿病专家的电子健康记录。纳入了 2016 年 4 月至 2022 年 9 月期间对年龄大于 18 岁的患者使用的所有英夫利西单抗(生物原研药或生物仿制药)。我们使用间断时间序列来模拟每次英夫利昔单抗生物类似药发布(英夫利昔单抗-dyb,2016 年 11 月;英夫利昔单抗-adba,2017 年 7 月;英夫利昔单抗-axxq,2020 年 7 月)对医疗保险、医疗补助和私人保险公司的吸收率的影响:随着第一和第二次生物类似物的发布,生物类似物的使用率缓慢上升,从2016年到2020年6月的年均增长率小于5%(医疗保险为3.2%,医疗补助为5.2%,私人保险为1.8%)。随着 2020 年 7 月第三次生物类似药的发布,医疗补助计划和私人保险计划的年均增长率分别达到 13% 和 16.4%,但医疗保险计划的年均增长率仍然较低(5.6%)。到 2022 年 9 月,医疗补助计划(43.8%)和私人保险(38.5%)的吸收率高于医疗保险(24%):我们的研究结果为政策制定者提供了两个重要发现。首先,我们的研究结果表明,1 个或 2 个生物仿制药可能不会产生足够的竞争来加快生物仿制药的采用率。其次,医疗保险覆盖了全国大多数接受生物制剂治疗的患者,即使在第三种生物仿制药问世后,其采用率也很低。需要采取政策杠杆来加快医疗保险受益人采用生物仿制药的速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信