Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing education Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20240711-02
Martha Buckner, Sara Camp, Sandra Murabito
{"title":"Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Martha Buckner, Sara Camp, Sandra Murabito","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240711-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complexity and change in health care environments, the rapid pace of knowledge generation, and changing education policy have led to national calls for change in nursing education. Many nursing programs have adopted a concept-based curriculum (CBC) to address these challenges. Yet, much is still uncertain about the outcomes and effectiveness of CBC, which requires large scale, time-consuming, and resource-intensive change.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This integrative review assesses the outcomes of CBC in nursing higher education with a focus on the comparison of CBC to traditional curricula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four relevant themes that emerged after an extensive literature review were critical thinking/clinical judgment, NCLEX-RN<sup>©</sup> (National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses) pass rates, graduation rates, and student satisfaction scores. Overall, the evidence base is not robust. A valid and reliable tool to measure clinical judgment is needed. The review specifically addresses CBC effects on student critical thinking and clinical judgment, traditional outcome metrics, (NCLEX-RN success, graduation rates, and student satisfaction), and other perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors found promising results on the effect CBC may have on critical thinking and clinical judgment and other perceived benefits. Findings were inconclusive on traditional outcome metrics. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(11):725-729.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240711-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complexity and change in health care environments, the rapid pace of knowledge generation, and changing education policy have led to national calls for change in nursing education. Many nursing programs have adopted a concept-based curriculum (CBC) to address these challenges. Yet, much is still uncertain about the outcomes and effectiveness of CBC, which requires large scale, time-consuming, and resource-intensive change.

Method: This integrative review assesses the outcomes of CBC in nursing higher education with a focus on the comparison of CBC to traditional curricula.

Results: The four relevant themes that emerged after an extensive literature review were critical thinking/clinical judgment, NCLEX-RN© (National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses) pass rates, graduation rates, and student satisfaction scores. Overall, the evidence base is not robust. A valid and reliable tool to measure clinical judgment is needed. The review specifically addresses CBC effects on student critical thinking and clinical judgment, traditional outcome metrics, (NCLEX-RN success, graduation rates, and student satisfaction), and other perceived benefits.

Conclusion: The authors found promising results on the effect CBC may have on critical thinking and clinical judgment and other perceived benefits. Findings were inconclusive on traditional outcome metrics. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(11):725-729.].

基于概念的课程的成果:综合评述。
背景:医疗保健环境的复杂多变、知识生成的日新月异以及教育政策的不断变化,促使全国上下呼吁对护理教育进行改革。许多护理专业都采用了基于概念的课程(CBC)来应对这些挑战。然而,CBC 的成果和效果仍有很多不确定因素,因为这需要大规模、耗时和资源密集型的变革:本综述评估了护理高等教育中的 CBC 成果,重点是 CBC 与传统课程的比较:结果:经过广泛的文献综述,得出了四个相关主题:批判性思维/临床判断、NCLEX-RN©(美国注册护士执照考试)通过率、毕业率和学生满意度评分。总体而言,证据基础并不充分。需要一种有效可靠的工具来衡量临床判断力。本综述特别讨论了 CBC 对学生批判性思维和临床判断力的影响、传统的结果指标(NCLEX-RN 成功率、毕业率和学生满意度)以及其他可感知的益处:作者发现,CBC 对批判性思维和临床判断力的影响以及其他可感知的益处都有可喜的结果。结论:作者发现,CBC 对批判性思维和临床判断力的影响以及其他感知到的益处具有良好的效果。[护理教育杂志,2024;63(X):XXX-XXX]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信