Applying Dynamical Systems Theory to Improve Personalized Medicine Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-07-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2024.0040
Shawn R Eagle, Rebecca J Henry
{"title":"Applying Dynamical Systems Theory to Improve Personalized Medicine Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Shawn R Eagle, Rebecca J Henry","doi":"10.1089/neur.2024.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A sizable proportion of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms and functional impairments months to years following injury. This phenomenon is continually observed despite an explosion of research and interest in improving mTBI clinical outcomes over the last two decades. All pharmacological clinical trials to date have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes for mTBI. One possible explanation for these continued failures is an overly myopic approach to treating mTBI (i.e., testing the effect of a single drug with a specific mechanism on a group of people with highly heterogenous injuries). Clinical presentation and prognosis of mTBI vary considerably between patients, and yet we continue to assess group-level effects of a homogenized treatment. We need to utilize an equally complex treatment approach to match the extraordinary complexity of the human brain. Dynamical systems theory has been used to describe systems composed of multiple subsystems who function somewhat independently but are ultimately interconnected. This theory was popularized in the motor control literature as an overarching framework for how the mind and body connect to interact and move through the environment. However, the human body can be viewed as a dynamical system composed of multiple subsystems (i.e., organ systems) who have isolated functions, which are also codependent on the health and performance of other interconnected organ systems. In this perspective piece, we will use the example of mTBI in the obese patient to demonstrate how broadening our approach to treatment of the individual (and not necessarily the injury) may ultimately yield improved outcomes. Furthermore, we will explore clinical and pre-clinical evidence demonstrating multiple system interactions in the context of obesity and TBI and discuss how expanding our understanding of the mechanistic interplay between multiple organ systems may ultimately provide a more personalized treatment approach for this mTBI patient subpopulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2024.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A sizable proportion of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms and functional impairments months to years following injury. This phenomenon is continually observed despite an explosion of research and interest in improving mTBI clinical outcomes over the last two decades. All pharmacological clinical trials to date have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes for mTBI. One possible explanation for these continued failures is an overly myopic approach to treating mTBI (i.e., testing the effect of a single drug with a specific mechanism on a group of people with highly heterogenous injuries). Clinical presentation and prognosis of mTBI vary considerably between patients, and yet we continue to assess group-level effects of a homogenized treatment. We need to utilize an equally complex treatment approach to match the extraordinary complexity of the human brain. Dynamical systems theory has been used to describe systems composed of multiple subsystems who function somewhat independently but are ultimately interconnected. This theory was popularized in the motor control literature as an overarching framework for how the mind and body connect to interact and move through the environment. However, the human body can be viewed as a dynamical system composed of multiple subsystems (i.e., organ systems) who have isolated functions, which are also codependent on the health and performance of other interconnected organ systems. In this perspective piece, we will use the example of mTBI in the obese patient to demonstrate how broadening our approach to treatment of the individual (and not necessarily the injury) may ultimately yield improved outcomes. Furthermore, we will explore clinical and pre-clinical evidence demonstrating multiple system interactions in the context of obesity and TBI and discuss how expanding our understanding of the mechanistic interplay between multiple organ systems may ultimately provide a more personalized treatment approach for this mTBI patient subpopulation.

应用动态系统理论改进轻度脑外伤后的个性化医疗。
相当一部分轻度脑外伤(mTBI)患者在伤后数月至数年仍有持续的症状和功能障碍。尽管在过去二十年中,人们对改善 mTBI 临床疗效的研究和兴趣呈爆炸式增长,但这种现象仍持续存在。迄今为止,所有药物临床试验都未能证明 mTBI 的治疗效果有所改善。对这些持续失败的一个可能解释是,治疗 mTBI 的方法过于近视(即测试具有特定机制的单一药物对具有高度异质性损伤的人群的影响)。不同患者的 mTBI 临床表现和预后差异很大,但我们仍在继续评估同质化治疗的群体效应。我们需要采用同样复杂的治疗方法,以适应人类大脑的非凡复杂性。动态系统理论被用来描述由多个子系统组成的系统,这些子系统在一定程度上独立运行,但最终又相互联系。这一理论在运动控制文献中广为流传,被作为身心如何在环境中互动和运动的总体框架。然而,人体可以被视为一个由多个子系统(即器官系统)组成的动态系统,这些子系统具有各自独立的功能,同时也依赖于其他相互关联的器官系统的健康和性能。在这篇透视文章中,我们将以肥胖患者的 mTBI 为例,说明我们如何拓宽治疗个体(而不一定是损伤)的方法,从而最终改善治疗效果。此外,我们还将探讨肥胖和创伤性脑损伤背景下多系统相互作用的临床和临床前证据,并讨论如何扩大我们对多个器官系统之间机理相互作用的理解,最终为这一创伤性脑损伤患者亚群提供更加个性化的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信