Effectiveness of remote neuropsychological interventions: A systematic review.

IF 1.4 4区心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2024.2382814

Akyllina Despoti, Kalliopi Megari, Anna Tsiakiri, Maida Toumaian, Vasiliki Koutzmpi, Athanasia Liozidou, Angeliki Tsapanou

{"title":"Effectiveness of remote neuropsychological interventions: A systematic review.","authors":"Akyllina Despoti, Kalliopi Megari, Anna Tsiakiri, Maida Toumaian, Vasiliki Koutzmpi, Athanasia Liozidou, Angeliki Tsapanou","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2382814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Remote healthcare services is an upgrowing dynamic field that has been used to reduce potential disease spread and prevent overloading of the healthcare system during COVID-19 pandemic. The need for online interventions during the pandemic required immediate response with sometimes inadequate preparation. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of remote healthcare services in the field of neuropsychological interventions.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, PsychINFO and Google Scholar. The main search terms were \"remote neuropsychological intervention or training.\" The included articles were RCT studies published in English, examining the effectiveness of remote healthcare services in neuropsychological interventions for adults with neurological disease diagnoses. Studies involving psychiatric disorders were excluded. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the studies and risk of bias using the PEDro Scale.Results: A total of 10 studies with 2.221 participants were included. All studies concluded that remote healthcare intervention programs can be feasible, safe and effective in the rehabilitation process of neurological diseases.Discussion: The present review demonstrated that the domains of neuropsychology have opportunities to forge ahead beyond traditional settings and have the ability to adapt to constantly changing environmental conditions with a view to providing patient care. Health policy plans should therefore be reformulated to include these needs in accordance with the social and cultural context of implementation.","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2382814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Remote healthcare services is an upgrowing dynamic field that has been used to reduce potential disease spread and prevent overloading of the healthcare system during COVID-19 pandemic. The need for online interventions during the pandemic required immediate response with sometimes inadequate preparation. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of remote healthcare services in the field of neuropsychological interventions.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, PsychINFO and Google Scholar. The main search terms were "remote neuropsychological intervention or training." The included articles were RCT studies published in English, examining the effectiveness of remote healthcare services in neuropsychological interventions for adults with neurological disease diagnoses. Studies involving psychiatric disorders were excluded. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the studies and risk of bias using the PEDro Scale.

Results: A total of 10 studies with 2.221 participants were included. All studies concluded that remote healthcare intervention programs can be feasible, safe and effective in the rehabilitation process of neurological diseases.

Discussion: The present review demonstrated that the domains of neuropsychology have opportunities to forge ahead beyond traditional settings and have the ability to adapt to constantly changing environmental conditions with a view to providing patient care. Health policy plans should therefore be reformulated to include these needs in accordance with the social and cultural context of implementation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

远程神经心理干预的有效性：系统综述。

目的：远程医疗保健服务是一个不断发展的动态领域，在 COVID-19 大流行期间，它被用来减少潜在的疾病传播并防止医疗保健系统超负荷运转。在大流行病期间，由于需要在线干预，因此需要立即做出反应，但有时准备不足。本研究旨在调查远程医疗保健服务在神经心理干预领域的有效性：在 PubMed、PsychINFO 和 Google Scholar 等电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。主要检索词为 "远程神经心理学干预或培训"。所纳入的文章均为用英语发表的 RCT 研究，这些研究考察了远程医疗保健服务对神经疾病诊断成人进行神经心理干预的有效性。涉及精神疾病的研究被排除在外。两位审稿人使用PEDro量表评估了研究的质量和偏倚风险：结果：共纳入 10 项研究，2 221 人参与。所有研究均认为，远程医疗干预项目在神经系统疾病的康复过程中是可行、安全和有效的：本综述表明，神经心理学领域有机会超越传统环境，并有能力适应不断变化的环境条件，为患者提供医疗服务。因此，应根据实施的社会和文化背景重新制定卫生政策计划，将这些需求纳入其中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

11.80%

发文量

134

期刊介绍： pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.