Impact of patient habitus and acquisition protocol on iodine quantification in dual-source photon-counting computed tomography.

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of iodine quantification accuracy with varying iterative reconstruction level, patient habitus, and acquisition mode on a first-generation dual-source photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system.

Approach: A multi-energy CT phantom with and without its extension ring equipped with various iodine inserts (0.2 to 15.0 mg/ml) was scanned over a range of radiation dose levels ( ${\mathrm{CTDI}}_{\mathrm{vol}}$ 0.5 to 15.0 mGy) using two tube voltages (120, 140 kVp) and two different source modes (single-, dual-source). To assess the agreement between nominal and measured iodine concentrations, iodine density maps at different iterative reconstruction levels were utilized to calculate root mean square error (RMSE) and generate Bland-Altman plots by grouping radiation dose levels (ultra-low: $<1.5$ ; low: 1.5 to 5; medium: 5 to 15 mGy) and iodine concentrations (low: $<5$ ; high: 5 to 15 mg/mL).

Results: Overall, quantification of iodine concentrations was accurate and reliable even at ultra-low radiation dose levels. RMSE ranged from 0.25 to 0.37, 0.20 to 0.38, and 0.25 to 0.37 mg/ml for ultra-low, low, and medium radiation dose levels, respectively. Similarly, RMSE was stable at 0.31, 0.28, 0.33, and 0.30 mg/ml for tube voltage and source mode combinations. Ultimately, the accuracy of iodine quantification was higher for the phantom without an extension ring (RMSE 0.21 mg/mL) and did not vary across different levels of iterative reconstruction.

Conclusions: The first-generation PCCT allows for accurate iodine quantification over a wide range of iodine concentrations and radiation dose levels. Stable accuracy across iterative reconstruction levels may allow further radiation exposure reductions without affecting quantitative results.