Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING
Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1177/17449871241226911
Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones, Helen Spiby
{"title":"Developing initial programme theories for a realist synthesis on digital clinical consultations in maternity care: contributions from stakeholder involvement.","authors":"Catrin Evans, Georgia Clancy, Kerry Evans, Andrew Booth, Benash Nazmeen, Stephen Timmons, Candice Sunney, Mark Clowes, Nia Wyn Jones, Helen Spiby","doi":"10.1177/17449871241226911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID pandemic prompted an increase in the use of digital clinical consultations (telephone or video calls) within midwifery and nursing care. This paper reports on a realist review project related to maternity care that seeks to illuminate for whom such consultations can safely and acceptably be used, how, for what purposes and in what contexts.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This paper addresses the first phase of a realist enquiry - initial programme theory development - focusing particularly on the role of stakeholder involvement (including digital transformation leaders, midwives, obstetricians, service users and community organisations).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three sub-stages of initial programme theory development are described highlighting the contribution of stakeholder groups to each stage: (i) consultation to focus the review question, (ii) focused searching and (iii) further consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Realist literature searching strategies yielded limited theory-rich evidence on digital consultations. Stakeholders provided essential additional contributions resulting in the development of 13 initial programme theories and a conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research on the implementation of virtual midwifery/nursing consultations is needed. Nursing/midwifery digital researchers should involve stakeholders to help shape research priorities, deepen contextual understanding and sense-check emerging findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":"29 2","pages":"127-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241226911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID pandemic prompted an increase in the use of digital clinical consultations (telephone or video calls) within midwifery and nursing care. This paper reports on a realist review project related to maternity care that seeks to illuminate for whom such consultations can safely and acceptably be used, how, for what purposes and in what contexts.

Aims: This paper addresses the first phase of a realist enquiry - initial programme theory development - focusing particularly on the role of stakeholder involvement (including digital transformation leaders, midwives, obstetricians, service users and community organisations).

Methods: Three sub-stages of initial programme theory development are described highlighting the contribution of stakeholder groups to each stage: (i) consultation to focus the review question, (ii) focused searching and (iii) further consultation.

Results: Realist literature searching strategies yielded limited theory-rich evidence on digital consultations. Stakeholders provided essential additional contributions resulting in the development of 13 initial programme theories and a conceptual framework.

Conclusions: More research on the implementation of virtual midwifery/nursing consultations is needed. Nursing/midwifery digital researchers should involve stakeholders to help shape research priorities, deepen contextual understanding and sense-check emerging findings.

为孕产妇护理数字化临床咨询的现实主义综合研究制定初步方案理论:利益相关者参与的贡献。
背景:COVID 大流行促使助产士和护理人员更多地使用数字临床咨询(电话或视频通话)。本文报告了一个与孕产妇护理相关的现实主义审查项目,该项目旨在阐明此类咨询可安全、可接受地用于哪些人、如何使用、用于何种目的以及在何种情况下使用。目的:本文讨论了现实主义调查的第一阶段--初步方案理论开发--尤其侧重于利益相关者(包括数字化转型领导者、助产士、产科医生、服务用户和社区组织)参与的作用:方法:描述了初步计划理论发展的三个子阶段,强调了利益相关群体对每个阶段的贡献:(i) 咨询以聚焦审查问题,(ii) 重点搜索和 (iii) 进一步咨询:结果:现实主义文献检索策略在数字咨询方面获得的理论丰富的证据有限。利益相关者提供了重要的补充意见,最终形成了 13 项初步方案理论和一个概念框架:需要对虚拟助产/护理咨询的实施进行更多研究。护理/助产数字化研究人员应让利益相关者参与进来,帮助确定研究重点、加深对背景的理解并对新发现进行感性检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信