Automatic processing of unattended mean emotion: Evidence from visual mismatch responses

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Luyan Ji , Zilong Chen , Xianqing Zeng , Bo Sun , Shimin Fu
{"title":"Automatic processing of unattended mean emotion: Evidence from visual mismatch responses","authors":"Luyan Ji ,&nbsp;Zilong Chen ,&nbsp;Xianqing Zeng ,&nbsp;Bo Sun ,&nbsp;Shimin Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mean emotion from multiple facial expressions can be extracted rapidly and precisely. However, it remains debated whether mean emotion processing is automatic which can occur under no attention. To address this question, we used a passive oddball paradigm and recorded event-related brain potentials when participants discriminated the changes in the central fixation while a set of four faces was presented in the periphery. The face set consisted of one happy and three angry expressions (mean negative) or one angry and three happy expressions (mean positive), and the mean negative and mean positive face sets were shown with a probability of 20% (deviant) and 80% (standard) respectively in the sequence, or the vice versa. The cluster-based permutation analyses showed that the visual mismatch negativity started early at around 92 ms and was also observed in later time windows when the mean emotion was negative, while a mismatch positivity was observed at around 168–266 ms when the mean emotion was positive. The results suggest that there might be different mechanisms underlying the processing of mean negative and mean positive emotions. More importantly, the brain can detect the changes in the mean emotion automatically, and ensemble coding for multiple facial expressions can occur in an automatic fashion without attention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mean emotion from multiple facial expressions can be extracted rapidly and precisely. However, it remains debated whether mean emotion processing is automatic which can occur under no attention. To address this question, we used a passive oddball paradigm and recorded event-related brain potentials when participants discriminated the changes in the central fixation while a set of four faces was presented in the periphery. The face set consisted of one happy and three angry expressions (mean negative) or one angry and three happy expressions (mean positive), and the mean negative and mean positive face sets were shown with a probability of 20% (deviant) and 80% (standard) respectively in the sequence, or the vice versa. The cluster-based permutation analyses showed that the visual mismatch negativity started early at around 92 ms and was also observed in later time windows when the mean emotion was negative, while a mismatch positivity was observed at around 168–266 ms when the mean emotion was positive. The results suggest that there might be different mechanisms underlying the processing of mean negative and mean positive emotions. More importantly, the brain can detect the changes in the mean emotion automatically, and ensemble coding for multiple facial expressions can occur in an automatic fashion without attention.

自动处理无人关注的平均情绪:来自视觉错配反应的证据
从多个面部表情中提取平均情绪可以做到快速而精确。然而,平均情绪处理是否是自动的,可以在没有注意的情况下发生,这一点仍存在争议。为了解决这个问题,我们使用了一种被动奇球范式,当参与者辨别中心定点的变化时,记录了与事件相关的脑电位,同时在外围呈现了一组四张人脸。面孔集包括一个快乐和三个愤怒的表情(平均负面)或一个愤怒和三个快乐的表情(平均正面),平均负面和平均正面面孔集在序列中出现的概率分别为 20%(偏差)和 80%(标准),反之亦然。基于聚类的排列分析表明,当平均情绪为消极时,视觉错配消极性在 92 毫秒左右开始出现,并在稍后的时间窗口中也能观察到;而当平均情绪为积极时,错配积极性在 168-266 毫秒左右出现。这些结果表明,平均负面情绪和平均正面情绪的处理机制可能不同。更重要的是,大脑可以自动检测平均情绪的变化,多种面部表情的集合编码可以在无需注意的情况下自动发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信