Cristina Moglia, Francesca Palumbo, Rossana Botto, Barbara Iazzolino, Nicola Ticozzi, Andrea Calvo, Paolo Leombruni
{"title":"Prognostic communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: findings from a Nationwide Italian survey.","authors":"Cristina Moglia, Francesca Palumbo, Rossana Botto, Barbara Iazzolino, Nicola Ticozzi, Andrea Calvo, Paolo Leombruni","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease with a highly variable prognosis. Among the proposed prognostic models, the European Network for the cure of ALS (ENCALS) survival model has demonstrated good predictive performance. However, few studies have examined prognostic communication and the diffusion of prognostic algorithms in ALS care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate neurologists' attitudes toward prognostic communication and their knowledge and utilization of the ENCALS survival model in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was administered between May 2021 and March 2022 to the 40 Italian ALS Centers members of the Motor Neuron Disease Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two out of 40 (55.0%) Italian ALS Centers responded to the survey, totaling 37 responses. The model was known by 27 (73.0%) respondents. However, it was predominantly utilized for research (81.1%) rather than for clinical prognostic communication (7.4%). Major obstacles to prognostic communication included the unpredictability of disease course, fear of a negative impact on patients or caregivers, dysfunctional reaction to diagnosis, and cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, the model was viewed as potentially useful for improving clinical management, increasing disease awareness, and facilitating care planning, especially end-of-life planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the widespread recognition and positive perceptions of the ENCALS survival model among Italian neurologists with expertise in ALS, its implementation in clinical practice remains limited. Addressing this disparity may require systematic investigations and targeted training to integrate tailored prognostic communication into ALS care protocols, aligning with the growing availability of prognostic tools for ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5787-5794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease with a highly variable prognosis. Among the proposed prognostic models, the European Network for the cure of ALS (ENCALS) survival model has demonstrated good predictive performance. However, few studies have examined prognostic communication and the diffusion of prognostic algorithms in ALS care.
Objective: To investigate neurologists' attitudes toward prognostic communication and their knowledge and utilization of the ENCALS survival model in clinical practice.
Methods: A web-based survey was administered between May 2021 and March 2022 to the 40 Italian ALS Centers members of the Motor Neuron Disease Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology.
Results: Twenty-two out of 40 (55.0%) Italian ALS Centers responded to the survey, totaling 37 responses. The model was known by 27 (73.0%) respondents. However, it was predominantly utilized for research (81.1%) rather than for clinical prognostic communication (7.4%). Major obstacles to prognostic communication included the unpredictability of disease course, fear of a negative impact on patients or caregivers, dysfunctional reaction to diagnosis, and cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, the model was viewed as potentially useful for improving clinical management, increasing disease awareness, and facilitating care planning, especially end-of-life planning.
Conclusions: Despite the widespread recognition and positive perceptions of the ENCALS survival model among Italian neurologists with expertise in ALS, its implementation in clinical practice remains limited. Addressing this disparity may require systematic investigations and targeted training to integrate tailored prognostic communication into ALS care protocols, aligning with the growing availability of prognostic tools for ALS.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.