Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years): A post hoc analysis of Japanese Phase 3 clinical trials.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Yoshiya Tanaka, Toshiya Takahashi, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Naoto Kato, Hideto Kameda
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years): A post hoc analysis of Japanese Phase 3 clinical trials.","authors":"Yoshiya Tanaka, Toshiya Takahashi, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Naoto Kato, Hideto Kameda","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in older patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of KAKEHASI (NCT02293902) and HARUKA (NCT02373202) trials with stratification by age (<65 and ≥65 years). Patients with moderately to severely active RA were treated with sarilumab in combination with methotrexate or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or as monotherapy. The primary end points in KAKEHASI and HARUKA trials were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses at Week 24 and safety, respectively. Secondary end points were other RA disease activity measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 20% of patients were aged ≥65 years in treatment arms across both trials, except the sarilumab + csDMARD arm (40%, 12/30). ACR20 response rates were similar between age groups across sarilumab treatment arms, and similar results were obtained for the CDAI scores. Safety profiles were similar between age groups except for a higher incidence of serious adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years in the sarilumab + methotrexate arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Japanese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 studies for sarilumab, no clear difference in efficacy or safety was observed between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in older patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of KAKEHASI (NCT02293902) and HARUKA (NCT02373202) trials with stratification by age (<65 and ≥65 years). Patients with moderately to severely active RA were treated with sarilumab in combination with methotrexate or with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or as monotherapy. The primary end points in KAKEHASI and HARUKA trials were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) responses at Week 24 and safety, respectively. Secondary end points were other RA disease activity measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).

Results: Approximately 20% of patients were aged ≥65 years in treatment arms across both trials, except the sarilumab + csDMARD arm (40%, 12/30). ACR20 response rates were similar between age groups across sarilumab treatment arms, and similar results were obtained for the CDAI scores. Safety profiles were similar between age groups except for a higher incidence of serious adverse events in patients aged ≥65 years in the sarilumab + methotrexate arm.

Conclusions: In Japanese patients with RA enrolled in Phase 3 studies for sarilumab, no clear difference in efficacy or safety was observed between patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.

按年龄分层(<65 岁和≥65 岁)的类风湿关节炎患者使用沙利单抗的疗效和安全性:日本3期临床试验的事后分析。
研究目的本研究旨在评估萨利单抗对活动性类风湿性关节炎(RA)老年患者的疗效和安全性:这是一项对KAKEHASI(NCT02293902)和HARUKA(NCT02373202)试验进行的事后分析,并按年龄进行了分层:在两项试验的治疗组中,除sarilumab+csDMARDs组(40%,12/30)外,约20%的患者年龄≥65岁。不同年龄组的患者对沙利利单抗治疗组的 ACR20 反应率相似,CDAI 评分结果也相似。除了在sarilumab+MTX治疗组中年龄≥65岁的患者严重不良事件发生率较高外,各年龄组的安全性相似:在参加萨利单抗3期研究的日本RA患者中,观察到不同年龄组患者在疗效和安全性方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Rheumatology
Modern Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery. Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered. Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信