Can flowable short-fiber-reinforced resins achieve a strong adhesion to bioceramics?

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Celalettin Topbaş, Abdurrahman Kerim Kul
{"title":"Can flowable short-fiber-reinforced resins achieve a strong adhesion to bioceramics?","authors":"Celalettin Topbaş, Abdurrahman Kerim Kul","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of four calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs), TheraCal PT (TPT), TheraCal LC (TLC), Biodentine (BD), and Dia-Root Bio MTA (DR), with a short fiber-reinforced composite resin (SFRC). Forty cylindrical acrylic blocks were used, each with a center hole (diameter 5 mm, depth 2 mm). CSCs were placed in the holes (n = 10/group), and the blocks were incubated for 48 h. G-Premio BOND, a self-etching adhesive, was applied to the CSCs surfaces using a micro-applicator for 10 s and then air-dried for 5 s, followed by light curing for 20 s. SFRC materials placed in cylindrical polyethylene capsules (diameter 2 mm, height 2 mm) were polymerized for 20 s and placed over the CSCs. The samples were then incubated at 37°C and 100% humidity for 24 h, and their μSBSs were tested using an \"Instron Universal Testing Machine.\" Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Statistically significant differences were observed between the tested CSCs. The μSBS of TPT (45.17 ± 4.56 MPa) was significantly higher (p < .05) than that of the other materials: BD, TLC, and DR had μSBSs of 29.18 ± 2.86 MPa (p < .05), 23.86 ± 2.84 MPa (p > .05), and 18.08 ± 2.69 MPa (p < .05), respectively. Considering the importance of bond strength for CSC sealing with restorative material, using SFRC over CSC was promising for improving the μSBS, adhesion, and sealing of the material. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Adhesion is critical to the success of vital pulp restorations. To achieve strong adhesion, the bioceramic material and the resin composite to which it is bonded are very important. In our study, short fiber-reinforced composite resin, which is gaining popularity, was used and found to be a promising material for improved adhesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of four calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs), TheraCal PT (TPT), TheraCal LC (TLC), Biodentine (BD), and Dia-Root Bio MTA (DR), with a short fiber-reinforced composite resin (SFRC). Forty cylindrical acrylic blocks were used, each with a center hole (diameter 5 mm, depth 2 mm). CSCs were placed in the holes (n = 10/group), and the blocks were incubated for 48 h. G-Premio BOND, a self-etching adhesive, was applied to the CSCs surfaces using a micro-applicator for 10 s and then air-dried for 5 s, followed by light curing for 20 s. SFRC materials placed in cylindrical polyethylene capsules (diameter 2 mm, height 2 mm) were polymerized for 20 s and placed over the CSCs. The samples were then incubated at 37°C and 100% humidity for 24 h, and their μSBSs were tested using an "Instron Universal Testing Machine." Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Statistically significant differences were observed between the tested CSCs. The μSBS of TPT (45.17 ± 4.56 MPa) was significantly higher (p < .05) than that of the other materials: BD, TLC, and DR had μSBSs of 29.18 ± 2.86 MPa (p < .05), 23.86 ± 2.84 MPa (p > .05), and 18.08 ± 2.69 MPa (p < .05), respectively. Considering the importance of bond strength for CSC sealing with restorative material, using SFRC over CSC was promising for improving the μSBS, adhesion, and sealing of the material. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Adhesion is critical to the success of vital pulp restorations. To achieve strong adhesion, the bioceramic material and the resin composite to which it is bonded are very important. In our study, short fiber-reinforced composite resin, which is gaining popularity, was used and found to be a promising material for improved adhesion.

可流动短纤维增强树脂能否实现与生物陶瓷的牢固粘合?
本研究比较了 TheraCal PT (TPT)、TheraCal LC (TLC)、Biodentine (BD) 和 Dia-Root Bio MTA (DR) 四种硅酸钙基水门汀 (CSC) 与短纤维增强复合树脂 (SFRC) 的微剪切粘接强度 (μSBS)。使用了 40 个圆柱形丙烯酸块,每个都有一个中心孔(直径 5 毫米,深度 2 毫米)。用微型涂抹器将自酸蚀粘合剂 G-Premio BOND 涂在 CSCs 表面 10 秒钟,然后风干 5 秒钟,接着光固化 20 秒钟。将 SFRC 材料放入圆柱形聚乙烯胶囊(直径 2 毫米,高 2 毫米)中聚合 20 秒,然后放在 CSC 上。然后将样品在 37°C 和 100% 湿度下培养 24 小时,并使用 "Instron 万能试验机 "对其 μSBS 进行测试。采用卡方检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对数据进行统计分析。经测试的 CSC 之间存在明显的统计学差异。TPT的μSBS(45.17 ± 4.56 MPa)明显高于TPT(p .05),18.08 ± 2.69 MPa(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信