Effect of different Volumes of exercise on skin temperature responses over the following 24 hours

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Willian da Silva , Juan R. Godoy-López , Álvaro Sosa Machado , Andressa Lemes Lemos , Carlos Sendra-Pérez , Manuel Gallango Brejano , Felipe P. Carpes , Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada
{"title":"Effect of different Volumes of exercise on skin temperature responses over the following 24 hours","authors":"Willian da Silva ,&nbsp;Juan R. Godoy-López ,&nbsp;Álvaro Sosa Machado ,&nbsp;Andressa Lemes Lemos ,&nbsp;Carlos Sendra-Pérez ,&nbsp;Manuel Gallango Brejano ,&nbsp;Felipe P. Carpes ,&nbsp;Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada","doi":"10.1016/j.jtherbio.2024.103923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Skin temperature responses have been advocated to indicate exercise-induced muscle soreness and recovery status. While the evidence is contradictory, we hypothesize that the presence of muscle damage and the time window of measurement are confounding factors in the skin temperature response. The objective was to determine whether skin temperature is influenced by different workloads and the time course of temperature measurements over the following 24 h. 24 trained male military were assigned to one of three groups: GC group (n = 8) serving as control not performing exercises, GE group (n = 8) performing a simulated military combat protocol in an exercise track with different obstacles but designed not to elicit muscle damage, and the GEMD group (n = 8) performing the simulated military combat protocol plus 5 sets of 20 drop jumps, with 10-sec between repetitions and with 2-min of rest between sets aiming to induce muscle damage. Skin temperature was measured using infrared thermography before exercise (Pre) and 4 (Post4h), 8 (Post8h) and 24h (Post24h) post-exercise. Perception of pain (DOMS) was evaluated Pre, Post24h, and Post48h, and countermovement jump height was evaluated at Pre and Post24h. DOMS did not differ between groups in the Pre and Post24h measures but GEMD presented higher DOMS than the other groups at Post48h (p &lt; 0.001 and large effect size). Jump height did not differ for GEMD and GC, and GE presented higher jump height at Post24h than GC (p = 0.02 and large effect size). Skin temperature responses of GEMD and GG were similar in all measurement moments (p &gt; 0.22), and GE presented higher skin temperature than the GC and the GEMD groups at Post24h (p &lt; 0.01 and large effect sizes). In conclusion, although physical exercise elicits higher skin temperature that lasts up to 24 h following the efforts, muscle soreness depresses this response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306456524001414/pdfft?md5=526ed48cdd3bd0310bb94b160a950e8f&pid=1-s2.0-S0306456524001414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306456524001414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin temperature responses have been advocated to indicate exercise-induced muscle soreness and recovery status. While the evidence is contradictory, we hypothesize that the presence of muscle damage and the time window of measurement are confounding factors in the skin temperature response. The objective was to determine whether skin temperature is influenced by different workloads and the time course of temperature measurements over the following 24 h. 24 trained male military were assigned to one of three groups: GC group (n = 8) serving as control not performing exercises, GE group (n = 8) performing a simulated military combat protocol in an exercise track with different obstacles but designed not to elicit muscle damage, and the GEMD group (n = 8) performing the simulated military combat protocol plus 5 sets of 20 drop jumps, with 10-sec between repetitions and with 2-min of rest between sets aiming to induce muscle damage. Skin temperature was measured using infrared thermography before exercise (Pre) and 4 (Post4h), 8 (Post8h) and 24h (Post24h) post-exercise. Perception of pain (DOMS) was evaluated Pre, Post24h, and Post48h, and countermovement jump height was evaluated at Pre and Post24h. DOMS did not differ between groups in the Pre and Post24h measures but GEMD presented higher DOMS than the other groups at Post48h (p < 0.001 and large effect size). Jump height did not differ for GEMD and GC, and GE presented higher jump height at Post24h than GC (p = 0.02 and large effect size). Skin temperature responses of GEMD and GG were similar in all measurement moments (p > 0.22), and GE presented higher skin temperature than the GC and the GEMD groups at Post24h (p < 0.01 and large effect sizes). In conclusion, although physical exercise elicits higher skin temperature that lasts up to 24 h following the efforts, muscle soreness depresses this response.

不同运动量对随后 24 小时内皮肤温度反应的影响。
有人主张用皮肤温度反应来显示运动引起的肌肉酸痛和恢复状况。虽然证据相互矛盾,但我们假设肌肉损伤的存在和测量的时间窗口是影响皮肤温度反应的干扰因素。24 名训练有素的男性军人被分配到三组中的一组:GC组(n = 8)作为对照组,不进行锻炼;GE组(n = 8)在有不同障碍物的跑道上进行模拟军事战斗训练,但不引起肌肉损伤;GEMD组(n = 8)进行模拟军事战斗训练,外加5组20次落体跳,每组之间间隔10秒,每组之间休息2分钟,目的是引起肌肉损伤。在运动前(Pre)、运动后 4 小时(Post4h)、运动后 8 小时(Post8h)和运动后 24 小时(Post24h)使用红外热成像技术测量皮肤温度。对运动前、运动后 24 小时和运动后 48 小时的疼痛感(DOMS)进行评估,对运动前和运动后 24 小时的反向运动跳跃高度进行评估。在运动前和运动后 24 小时内,各组之间的 DOMS 没有差异,但在运动后 48 小时内,GEMD 组的 DOMS 高于其他组(p 0.22);在运动后 24 小时内,GE 组的皮肤温度高于 GC 组和 GEMD 组(p 0.23)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信