Jacques B.E. Versailles MD, MSc, Luis Bahamondes MD, PhD, Ana Claudia Marcelino MD, MC, Paula da Cunha Pereira RN, MC, Cassia R.T. Juliato MD, PhD
{"title":"Prospective Evaluation of Ease and Difficulties of 869 Cases of Intrauterine Devices Removals","authors":"Jacques B.E. Versailles MD, MSc, Luis Bahamondes MD, PhD, Ana Claudia Marcelino MD, MC, Paula da Cunha Pereira RN, MC, Cassia R.T. Juliato MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective was to describe the ease and difficulty of removing intrauterine devices (IUDs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a prospective study at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. We included women who requested IUD removal. We excluded women with partial IUD expulsion in which the IUD was protruded at the external os. We identified difficult IUD removal when the removal was challenging, including the inability to visualize IUD strings extending from the cervical os.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 869 women participated. Women were aged 29.4 ± 8.0 years (mean ± SD; range 14–51) and the duration of IUD use at the time of removal was 4.3 ± 4.2 years. We found that 702 (80.8%) women had visible strings at the external os and the removals were performed at the first attempt without difficulty in 692 (79.6%) participants. The pain was more intense (>4) in cases of difficult removals. After multivariate logistic analysis, difficult removals were associated with users of IUD ≥3 years (3 times higher risk); for each previous cesarean delivery, the risk increased by 1.5 times.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study showed that IUD removal is an easy and safe procedure, with only a small proportion of women reporting significant pain with IUD removal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The objective was to describe the ease and difficulty of removing intrauterine devices (IUDs).
Methods
We conducted a prospective study at the University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP. We included women who requested IUD removal. We excluded women with partial IUD expulsion in which the IUD was protruded at the external os. We identified difficult IUD removal when the removal was challenging, including the inability to visualize IUD strings extending from the cervical os.
Results
A total of 869 women participated. Women were aged 29.4 ± 8.0 years (mean ± SD; range 14–51) and the duration of IUD use at the time of removal was 4.3 ± 4.2 years. We found that 702 (80.8%) women had visible strings at the external os and the removals were performed at the first attempt without difficulty in 692 (79.6%) participants. The pain was more intense (>4) in cases of difficult removals. After multivariate logistic analysis, difficult removals were associated with users of IUD ≥3 years (3 times higher risk); for each previous cesarean delivery, the risk increased by 1.5 times.
Conclusions
Our study showed that IUD removal is an easy and safe procedure, with only a small proportion of women reporting significant pain with IUD removal.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.