Relative Strength and Physical Performance in US Army Male and Female Soldiers.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Tyson Grier, Timothy Benedict, Olivia Mahlmann, Michelle Canham-Chervak
{"title":"Relative Strength and Physical Performance in US Army Male and Female Soldiers.","authors":"Tyson Grier, Timothy Benedict, Olivia Mahlmann, Michelle Canham-Chervak","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Grier, T, Benedict, T, Mahlmann, O, and Canham-Chervak, M. Relative Strength and Physical Performance in U.S. Army Male and Female Soldiers. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1479-1485, 2024-In occupations with high physical demands, strength relative to bodymass is an important measure as it signifies an individual's ability to control and move their body mass through space. The purpose of this investigation was to examine physical characteristics, training, and performance based on different magnitudes of relative strength. Subjects were 1,806 male and 319 female US Army soldiers. Sex, age, height, body mass, and physical training data were obtained by an electronic survey. Physical performance was measured by the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT), which includes a three-repetition maximum deadlift, standing power throw, hand release push-up, sprint-drag-carry, leg tuck, and two-mile run. The relative body mass deadlifted was calculated and categorized into 4 groups for men and 3 groups for women. An analysis of variance and post hoc least significant difference test were used to evaluate the differences in relative strength and physical performance. Overall, 33% of men deadlifted ≥1.5 times their body mass, while 30% of women deadlifted ≥1.25 times their body mass. Men and women deadlifting the highest percentage of their body mass (≥1.5 times for men and ≥1.25 times for women) outperformed those with lower relative strength within their own sex in all 6 ACFT events. In 4 of the 6 ACFT events, women who deadlifted ≥1.25 times their body mass had similar performance compared with men deadlifting 1 to 1.24 times their body mass and outperformed men deadlifting <1 times their body mass. Greater strength relative to body mass was associated with higher physical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Grier, T, Benedict, T, Mahlmann, O, and Canham-Chervak, M. Relative Strength and Physical Performance in U.S. Army Male and Female Soldiers. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1479-1485, 2024-In occupations with high physical demands, strength relative to bodymass is an important measure as it signifies an individual's ability to control and move their body mass through space. The purpose of this investigation was to examine physical characteristics, training, and performance based on different magnitudes of relative strength. Subjects were 1,806 male and 319 female US Army soldiers. Sex, age, height, body mass, and physical training data were obtained by an electronic survey. Physical performance was measured by the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT), which includes a three-repetition maximum deadlift, standing power throw, hand release push-up, sprint-drag-carry, leg tuck, and two-mile run. The relative body mass deadlifted was calculated and categorized into 4 groups for men and 3 groups for women. An analysis of variance and post hoc least significant difference test were used to evaluate the differences in relative strength and physical performance. Overall, 33% of men deadlifted ≥1.5 times their body mass, while 30% of women deadlifted ≥1.25 times their body mass. Men and women deadlifting the highest percentage of their body mass (≥1.5 times for men and ≥1.25 times for women) outperformed those with lower relative strength within their own sex in all 6 ACFT events. In 4 of the 6 ACFT events, women who deadlifted ≥1.25 times their body mass had similar performance compared with men deadlifting 1 to 1.24 times their body mass and outperformed men deadlifting <1 times their body mass. Greater strength relative to body mass was associated with higher physical performance.

美国陆军男女士兵的相对力量和体能表现。
Abstract: Grier, T, Benedict, T, Mahlmann, O, and Canham-Chervak, M. Relative Strength and Physical Performance in U.S. Army Male and Female Soldiers.J Strength Cond Res 38(8):1479-1485, 2024-在体能要求较高的职业中,相对于体重的力量是一项重要的衡量指标,因为它标志着一个人在空间中控制和移动体重的能力。这项调查的目的是根据相对力量的不同大小来研究身体特征、训练和表现。研究对象为 1806 名男性和 319 名女性美国陆军士兵。通过电子调查获得了性别、年龄、身高、体重和体能训练数据。体能表现通过陆军战斗体能测试(ACFT)进行测量,其中包括三次最大举重、立定投掷、徒手俯卧撑、冲刺-拖拽-搬运、收腿和两英里跑。计算举起的相对体重并将男子分为 4 组,女子分为 3 组。采用方差分析和事后最小显著差异检验来评估相对力量和体能表现的差异。总体而言,33% 的男性负重≥1.5 倍体重,而 30% 的女性负重≥1.25 倍体重。在所有 6 个 ACFT 项目中,负重占体重百分比最高的男性和女性(男性≥1.5 倍,女性≥1.25 倍)的成绩均优于相对力量较低的性别。在 6 个 ACFT 项目中的 4 个项目中,负重≥1.25 倍体重的女性与负重 1 至 1.24 倍体重的男性相比,成绩相近,而负重≥1.25 倍体重的女性则优于负重≥1.24 倍体重的男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信