Efficacy of Supersets Versus Traditional Sets in Whole-Body Multiple-Joint Resistance Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Vegard Moe Iversen, Vemund Bakken Eide, Bjørnar Jakobsen Unhjem, Marius Steiro Fimland
{"title":"Efficacy of Supersets Versus Traditional Sets in Whole-Body Multiple-Joint Resistance Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vegard Moe Iversen, Vemund Bakken Eide, Bjørnar Jakobsen Unhjem, Marius Steiro Fimland","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Iversen, VM, Eide, VB, Unhjem, BJ, and Fimland, MS. Efficacy of supersets versus traditional sets in whole-body multiple-joint resistance training: A randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1372-1378, 2024-Time constraints often hinder exercise engagement, necessitating exploration of time-efficient resistance training methods. Superset training, where 2 exercises are performed successively with minimal rest, nearly halves session duration but is metabolically demanding, possibly reducing strength gains. In a randomized controlled trial with blinded test leaders, we examined the efficacy of supersets versus traditional sets in a full-body, multiple-joint resistance training workout on maximal strength in the trained exercises. Subjects took part in a 3-week introductory training phase before baseline testing to ensure they were thoroughly familiarized. Next, they were randomized to a superset- or a traditional-set group, performing 10 weeks of heavy multiple-joint resistance training twice per week. The exercise programs consisted of leg press, bench press, lat pull-down, and seated rows. The traditional training group had a 5.2-kg higher improvement in pull-down than the superset group (p = 0.033), and a close to significant 4.8-kg higher improvement in seated rows (p = 0.073). The improvements in leg press and bench press were quite similar for both groups (p = 0.507-0.527). There were no changes between groups in body composition outcomes (0.151-0.640), but both groups increased muscle mass and reduced fat mass (p < 0.05). In conclusion, superset training of multi-joint exercises hampered maximal strength gains somewhat compared with traditional-set training. However, there were very similar improvements in body composition, and strength gains were observed for all exercises in the superset group. Thus, whole-body, multiple-joint superset resistance training could be a viable time-saving approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"38 8","pages":"1372-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Iversen, VM, Eide, VB, Unhjem, BJ, and Fimland, MS. Efficacy of supersets versus traditional sets in whole-body multiple-joint resistance training: A randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): 1372-1378, 2024-Time constraints often hinder exercise engagement, necessitating exploration of time-efficient resistance training methods. Superset training, where 2 exercises are performed successively with minimal rest, nearly halves session duration but is metabolically demanding, possibly reducing strength gains. In a randomized controlled trial with blinded test leaders, we examined the efficacy of supersets versus traditional sets in a full-body, multiple-joint resistance training workout on maximal strength in the trained exercises. Subjects took part in a 3-week introductory training phase before baseline testing to ensure they were thoroughly familiarized. Next, they were randomized to a superset- or a traditional-set group, performing 10 weeks of heavy multiple-joint resistance training twice per week. The exercise programs consisted of leg press, bench press, lat pull-down, and seated rows. The traditional training group had a 5.2-kg higher improvement in pull-down than the superset group (p = 0.033), and a close to significant 4.8-kg higher improvement in seated rows (p = 0.073). The improvements in leg press and bench press were quite similar for both groups (p = 0.507-0.527). There were no changes between groups in body composition outcomes (0.151-0.640), but both groups increased muscle mass and reduced fat mass (p < 0.05). In conclusion, superset training of multi-joint exercises hampered maximal strength gains somewhat compared with traditional-set training. However, there were very similar improvements in body composition, and strength gains were observed for all exercises in the superset group. Thus, whole-body, multiple-joint superset resistance training could be a viable time-saving approach.

超级组与传统组在全身多关节阻力训练中的功效:随机对照试验
摘要:Iversen、VM、Eide、VB、Unhjem、BJ 和 Fimland、MS。在全身多关节阻力训练中,超组训练与传统组训练的效果对比:随机对照试验。J Strength Cond Res 38(8):1372-1378,2024-时间限制往往会阻碍锻炼的参与度,因此有必要探索节省时间的阻力训练方法。超级组训练,即在最少休息时间内连续进行两项练习,可将训练时间缩短近一半,但对新陈代谢要求较高,可能会降低力量收益。在一项采用盲法的随机对照试验中,我们研究了在全身多关节阻力训练中,超组训练与传统组训练对训练动作最大力量的影响。在基线测试之前,受试者参加了为期 3 周的入门训练,以确保他们已经完全熟悉。接下来,他们被随机分配到超组或传统组,进行为期 10 周的每周两次重型多关节阻力训练。训练项目包括腿部推举、卧推、腹肌下拉和坐姿划船。传统训练组在下拉方面比超组提高了 5.2 千克(P = 0.033),在坐姿划船方面提高了 4.8 千克(P = 0.073),接近显著水平。两组在腿部推举和卧推方面的进步非常相似(p = 0.507-0.527)。在身体成分结果(0.151-0.640)方面,组间没有变化,但两组都增加了肌肉量,减少了脂肪量(p < 0.05)。总之,与传统的成组训练相比,多关节超成组训练在一定程度上阻碍了最大力量的增加。不过,超组训练对身体成分的改善非常相似,而且在超组训练中,所有练习的力量都有提高。因此,全身多关节超组阻力训练可能是一种节省时间的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信