Trifecta outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: A comparison of body mass index <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Haruyuki Ohsugi, Junichi Ikeda, Kenta Takayasu, Nae Takizawa, Hisanori Taniguchi, Masaaki Yanishi, Hidefumi Kinoshita
{"title":"Trifecta outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: A comparison of body mass index <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30","authors":"Haruyuki Ohsugi,&nbsp;Junichi Ikeda,&nbsp;Kenta Takayasu,&nbsp;Nae Takizawa,&nbsp;Hisanori Taniguchi,&nbsp;Masaaki Yanishi,&nbsp;Hidefumi Kinoshita","doi":"10.1111/iju.15529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) outcomes in obese patients based on body mass index (BMI) and trifecta achievement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 296 patients who underwent RPN at Kansai Medical University Hospital between 2014 and 2022. The preoperative clinical data and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. Trifecta achievement (negative surgical margin, no major complications, and no acute kidney injury on postoperative day three) and its relationship to three BMI groups (&lt;25, 25 to &lt;30, and ≥30) were the primary outcome. The correlation between factors in achieving trifecta and BMI was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed variables for achieving the trifecta with logistic regression analysis. C-statistics quantitatively evaluated the prediction accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 296 patients, 264 (89.2%) achieved trifecta (BMI categories were &lt;25 [89.9%], 25 to &lt;30 [89.4%], and ≥30 [82.6%]). There was no significant BMI-related difference (<i>p</i> = 0.566). Intraoperative blood loss increased with the BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.034). Multivariate analyses showed preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic (PADUA) score independently predicted trifecta failure (odds ratio 1.71; 95% confidence interval 1.32–2.20; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The C-statistics of the PADUA score increased with increasing BMI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Higher BMI patients had more intraoperative blood loss during RPN. However, RPN remains safe and has acceptable quality and functional outcomes. Since patients with high PADUA scores combined with a high BMI may be at risk of trifecta failure, this should be explained before RPN.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"31 10","pages":"1108-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.15529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We analyzed robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) outcomes in obese patients based on body mass index (BMI) and trifecta achievement.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 296 patients who underwent RPN at Kansai Medical University Hospital between 2014 and 2022. The preoperative clinical data and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. Trifecta achievement (negative surgical margin, no major complications, and no acute kidney injury on postoperative day three) and its relationship to three BMI groups (<25, 25 to <30, and ≥30) were the primary outcome. The correlation between factors in achieving trifecta and BMI was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed variables for achieving the trifecta with logistic regression analysis. C-statistics quantitatively evaluated the prediction accuracy.

Results

Among 296 patients, 264 (89.2%) achieved trifecta (BMI categories were <25 [89.9%], 25 to <30 [89.4%], and ≥30 [82.6%]). There was no significant BMI-related difference (p = 0.566). Intraoperative blood loss increased with the BMI (p = 0.034). Multivariate analyses showed preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic (PADUA) score independently predicted trifecta failure (odds ratio 1.71; 95% confidence interval 1.32–2.20; p < 0.001). The C-statistics of the PADUA score increased with increasing BMI.

Conclusions

Higher BMI patients had more intraoperative blood loss during RPN. However, RPN remains safe and has acceptable quality and functional outcomes. Since patients with high PADUA scores combined with a high BMI may be at risk of trifecta failure, this should be explained before RPN.

肥胖患者机器人肾部分切除术的三重结果:体重指数<25、25-<30和≥30的比较。
目的我们根据体重指数(BMI)和三围结果分析了肥胖患者接受机器人肾部分切除术(RPN)的结果:我们回顾性分析了2014年至2022年期间在关西医科大学附属医院接受RPN手术的296名患者。对术前临床数据和围手术期结果进行了评估。三项指标(手术切缘阴性、无重大并发症、术后第三天无急性肾损伤)及其与三个体重指数组的关系(结果:在 296 名患者中,有 264 人(89.2%)达到了三重标准(BMI 分类为结论:BMI 较高的患者在 RPN 过程中术中失血较多。然而,RPN 仍然是安全的,其质量和功能结果也是可以接受的。由于 PADUA 评分高且体重指数(BMI)高的患者可能面临三连冠失败的风险,因此在进行 RPN 之前应对此进行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信