Prenatal cell-free DNA screening for chromosomal aneuploidies after euploid embryo transfer shows high concordance with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results and low positive predictive values.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.029
Mitko Madjunkov, Prati Sharma, Ari Baratz, Karen Glass, Rina Abramov, Nicole Logan, Svetlana Madjunkova, Clifford Librach
{"title":"Prenatal cell-free DNA screening for chromosomal aneuploidies after euploid embryo transfer shows high concordance with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results and low positive predictive values.","authors":"Mitko Madjunkov, Prati Sharma, Ari Baratz, Karen Glass, Rina Abramov, Nicole Logan, Svetlana Madjunkova, Clifford Librach","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for chromosomal aneuploidies in pregnancies achieved either after single euploid transfer in in vitro fertilization or Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles or transfer of single untested embryo, and to assess the concordance of prenatal-cfDNA-screening and PGT-A results.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fertility clinic.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>A total of 2,973 prenatal-cfDNA-screening results for the most common trisomies (T13, T18, T21, X, and Y) and microdeletions (1p36, 4p16.3, 5p15.2, 15q11.2, and 22q11.2) from singleton pregnancies allocated into two groups: PGT-A group (n = 1,204) pregnant after single euploid transfer and non-PGT-A group (n = 1769) pregnant after transfer of single untested embryo, between 2016 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of prenatal-cfDNA screening. Positive and negative prenatal-cfDNA-screening results and subsequent prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing were used to classify each positive prenatal-cfDNA-screening result as a true or a false positive. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate the concordance of PGT-A and prenatal-cfDNA-screening results and to assess the differences in the fetal fraction of cfDNA used for prenatal-cfDNA-screening reports between the study groups.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>Prenatal-cfDNA screening was performed at a mean 11.3 ± 1.8 weeks gestational age, and yielded results in 99.9% of the patients (0.1% cancellation rate). There was no difference in the fetal fraction between PGT-A tested and not tested pregnancies (9.5% ± 4% vs. 10.3% ± 4%). 13 positive prenatal-cfDNA-screening results (two T21, two X0, four XXX, one XYY, one indeterminate sex, two 22q11 del/dup, and one 15q11.2del) were received for PGT-A group. Only one (22q11 dup) was confirmed with amniocentesis and fetal autopsy, giving a PPV for an abnormal prenatal-cfDNA screening of 7.7%, the rest had results concordant with PGT-A. Sex chromosomes were 100% concordant between prenatal-cfDNA-screening and PGT-A results, giving a 100% PPV for PGT-A for sex chromosomes and 100% negative predictive value for aneuploidies. Positive prenatal-cfDNA-screening results were received for 27 pregnancies from untested embryos (1.5%), follow-up testing was electively performed for 21, and 8 had confirmed the prenatal-cfDNA-screening result, giving a PPV for the non-PGT-A group of 38%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>This study demonstrates that patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/PGT-A and single euploid embryo transfer can reliably do prenatal-cfDNA screening during their first trimester. Fetal fraction in singleton pregnancies after PGT-A tested embryos is not different from pregnancies with untested embryos. Positive predictive value for an abnormal prenatal-cfDNA-screening result after euploid embryo transfer was reassuringly low (7.7%). PGT-A reliably selects against aneuploidy with 100% concordance with fetal sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"1105-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for chromosomal aneuploidies in pregnancies achieved either after single euploid transfer in in vitro fertilization or Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles or transfer of single untested embryo, and to assess the concordance of prenatal-cfDNA-screening and PGT-A results.

Design: Single center retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Fertility clinic.

Patient(s): A total of 2,973 prenatal-cfDNA-screening results for the most common trisomies (T13, T18, T21, X, and Y) and microdeletions (1p36, 4p16.3, 5p15.2, 15q11.2, and 22q11.2) from singleton pregnancies allocated into two groups: PGT-A group (n = 1,204) pregnant after single euploid transfer and non-PGT-A group (n = 1769) pregnant after transfer of single untested embryo, between 2016 and 2023.

Intervention(s): Not applicable.

Main outcome measure(s): The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of prenatal-cfDNA screening. Positive and negative prenatal-cfDNA-screening results and subsequent prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing were used to classify each positive prenatal-cfDNA-screening result as a true or a false positive. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate the concordance of PGT-A and prenatal-cfDNA-screening results and to assess the differences in the fetal fraction of cfDNA used for prenatal-cfDNA-screening reports between the study groups.

Result(s): Prenatal-cfDNA screening was performed at a mean 11.3 ± 1.8 weeks gestational age, and yielded results in 99.9% of the patients (0.1% cancellation rate). There was no difference in the fetal fraction between PGT-A tested and not tested pregnancies (9.5% ± 4% vs. 10.3% ± 4%). 13 positive prenatal-cfDNA-screening results (two T21, two X0, four XXX, one XYY, one indeterminate sex, two 22q11 del/dup, and one 15q11.2del) were received for PGT-A group. Only one (22q11 dup) was confirmed with amniocentesis and fetal autopsy, giving a PPV for an abnormal prenatal-cfDNA screening of 7.7%, the rest had results concordant with PGT-A. Sex chromosomes were 100% concordant between prenatal-cfDNA-screening and PGT-A results, giving a 100% PPV for PGT-A for sex chromosomes and 100% negative predictive value for aneuploidies. Positive prenatal-cfDNA-screening results were received for 27 pregnancies from untested embryos (1.5%), follow-up testing was electively performed for 21, and 8 had confirmed the prenatal-cfDNA-screening result, giving a PPV for the non-PGT-A group of 38%.

Conclusion(s): This study demonstrates that patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/PGT-A and single euploid embryo transfer can reliably do prenatal-cfDNA screening during their first trimester. Fetal fraction in singleton pregnancies after PGT-A tested embryos is not different from pregnancies with untested embryos. Positive predictive value for an abnormal prenatal-cfDNA-screening result after euploid embryo transfer was reassuringly low (7.7%). PGT-A reliably selects against aneuploidy with 100% concordance with fetal sex.

优胚移植后染色体非整倍体的产前无细胞 DNA 筛查显示与 PGT-A 结果高度一致,但阳性预测值较低。
目的评估产前无细胞 DNA 筛查对试管婴儿/PGT 周期中单倍体移植或单个未检测胚胎移植后妊娠中染色体非整倍体的阳性预测值 (PPV),并评估产前无细胞 DNA 筛查和 PGT-A 结果的一致性:单中心回顾性队列研究 对象:2973 例单胎妊娠中最常见的三体(T)(T13,T18,T21,X,Y)和微缺失(1p36;4p16.3;5p15.2;15q11.2;22q11.2)的产前 cfDNA 筛查结果:2016年至2023年期间,PGT-A组(n=1204)移植单个优倍体后妊娠,非PGT-A组(n=1769)移植单个未检测胚胎后妊娠:主要结果指标:主要结果指标为产前无细胞DNA筛查的准确性。产前无细胞 DNA 筛查结果的阳性和阴性,以及随后的产前或产后诊断检测,用于将每个产前无细胞 DNA 筛查阳性结果分为真阳性和假阳性。次要终点是评估PGT-A和产前无细胞DNA筛查结果的一致性,以及评估研究组之间用于产前无细胞DNA筛查报告的胎儿无细胞DNA部分的差异:产前无细胞 DNA 筛查在平均 11.3±1.8 孕周(GA)时进行,99.9% 的患者获得了结果(取消率为 0.1%)。接受过 PGT-A 检测和未接受过 PGT-A 检测的孕妇的胎儿比例没有差异(9.5%±4% vs 10.3%±4%)。PGT-A 组共收到 13 份阳性产前免细胞 DNA 筛查结果(2-T21、2-X0、4-XXX、1-XYY、1-性别不确定、2-22q11 del/dup、1-15q11.2)。只有 1 例(22q11 dup)通过羊膜腔穿刺和胎儿尸检得到证实,产前 DNA 筛查异常的 PPV 为 7.7%,其余结果与 PGT-A 一致。产前无细胞 DNA 筛查与 PGT-A 结果的性染色体一致性为 100%,因此 PGT-A 对性染色体的 PPV 为 100%,对非整倍体的 NPV 为 100%。27例未经检测的胚胎妊娠(1.5%)的产前无细胞DNA筛查结果呈阳性,21例选择进行了后续检测,8例确认了产前无细胞DNA筛查结果,非PGT-A组的PPV为38%:本研究表明,接受体外受精/PGT 和单胚胎移植的患者可在妊娠头三个月进行可靠的产前无细胞 DNA 筛查。经过 PGT-A 胚胎检测的单胎妊娠与未经检测的胚胎妊娠的胎儿分数没有差异。优倍体胚胎移植后产前无细胞 DNA 筛查结果异常的 PPV 很低(7.7%),令人欣慰。PGT-A 能可靠地选择非整倍体,与胎儿性别的一致性达到 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信