Functional determinants of uterine contractility in endometriosis and adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.026
Noemi Salmeri, Giorgia Di Stefano, Paola Viganò, Pamela Stratton, Edgardo Somigliana, Paolo Vercellini
{"title":"Functional determinants of uterine contractility in endometriosis and adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Noemi Salmeri, Giorgia Di Stefano, Paola Viganò, Pamela Stratton, Edgardo Somigliana, Paolo Vercellini","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence suggests that aberrant uterine contractility in nonpregnant women with endometriosis and adenomyosis contributes to symptoms and potentially heralds their pathogenesis. However, uterine peristalsis remains understudied, inconsistently measured, and poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize evidence on uterine contractility across the menstrual cycle phases in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases searched up to May 2, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection and synthesis: </strong>Observational studies compared quantitative measures of uterine contractility using magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, electrophysiology, or direct intrauterine pressure recording across different menstrual cycle phases between women with endometriosis/adenomyosis and controls on the basis of predefined problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates for primary (risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and secondary (mean difference [MD] with 95% CIs) outcomes were calculated using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Pooled risk of retrograde menstruation uterine contraction pattern in cases vs. controls; pooled MD in continuous measures of uterine contractility (frequency, amplitude, and velocity of contractions) across all the menstrual cycle phases in cases vs. controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the inclusion criteria; most were studies that evaluated women with endometriosis. An increased risk of retrograde uterine contractions during menstruation was observed in women with endometriosis compared with that in controls (risk ratio, 8.63; 95% CI, 3.24-22.95; I<sup>2</sup>, 0). The pooled MDs in contraction frequency between cases and controls were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.13-1.52; I<sup>2</sup>, 18.61%) in the menstrual phase and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.22-0.83; I<sup>2</sup>, 27.18%) in the luteal phase. Results for the follicular and periovulatory phases were more heterogeneous. Higher contraction amplitudes in women with endometriosis or adenomyosis were reported across all menstrual cycle phases. Because of the paucity of data, especially for adenomyosis, evidence certainty was graded as low for most comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The approximately ninefold increased risk of retrograde pattern during menstruation in endometriosis supports the potential role of retrograde menstruation in its etiopathogenesis. Abnormal uterine contractility, likely not limited to the menstrual phase, may be a mechanical factor contributing to development of endometriosis and related symptoms, including menstrual pain and infertility, with limited, mostly concordant evidence for adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>PROSPERO ID CRD42024512273-accepted on February 23, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"1063-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Evidence suggests that aberrant uterine contractility in nonpregnant women with endometriosis and adenomyosis contributes to symptoms and potentially heralds their pathogenesis. However, uterine peristalsis remains understudied, inconsistently measured, and poorly understood.

Objective: To summarize evidence on uterine contractility across the menstrual cycle phases in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases searched up to May 2, 2024.

Study selection and synthesis: Observational studies compared quantitative measures of uterine contractility using magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, electrophysiology, or direct intrauterine pressure recording across different menstrual cycle phases between women with endometriosis/adenomyosis and controls on the basis of predefined problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates for primary (risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and secondary (mean difference [MD] with 95% CIs) outcomes were calculated using random-effects models.

Main outcomes: Pooled risk of retrograde menstruation uterine contraction pattern in cases vs. controls; pooled MD in continuous measures of uterine contractility (frequency, amplitude, and velocity of contractions) across all the menstrual cycle phases in cases vs. controls.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria; most were studies that evaluated women with endometriosis. An increased risk of retrograde uterine contractions during menstruation was observed in women with endometriosis compared with that in controls (risk ratio, 8.63; 95% CI, 3.24-22.95; I2, 0). The pooled MDs in contraction frequency between cases and controls were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.13-1.52; I2, 18.61%) in the menstrual phase and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.22-0.83; I2, 27.18%) in the luteal phase. Results for the follicular and periovulatory phases were more heterogeneous. Higher contraction amplitudes in women with endometriosis or adenomyosis were reported across all menstrual cycle phases. Because of the paucity of data, especially for adenomyosis, evidence certainty was graded as low for most comparisons.

Conclusion and relevance: The approximately ninefold increased risk of retrograde pattern during menstruation in endometriosis supports the potential role of retrograde menstruation in its etiopathogenesis. Abnormal uterine contractility, likely not limited to the menstrual phase, may be a mechanical factor contributing to development of endometriosis and related symptoms, including menstrual pain and infertility, with limited, mostly concordant evidence for adenomyosis.

Registration number: PROSPERO ID CRD42024512273-accepted on February 23, 2024.

子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌症中子宫收缩功能的决定因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
重要性:有证据表明,患有子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌症的非妊娠妇女的子宫收缩异常会导致症状,并可能预示着其发病机制。然而,对子宫蠕动的研究仍然不足,测量方法也不一致,人们对其了解甚少:总结患有子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌症的妇女在月经周期各阶段子宫收缩力的证据:数据来源:PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库,检索时间截至 2024 年 5 月 2 日:观察性研究比较了子宫内膜异位症/子宫腺肌症妇女和对照组在不同月经周期阶段使用核磁共振成像、超声波、电生理学或直接宫腔内压力记录对子宫收缩力进行的定量测量,这些测量基于预先定义的PICOS标准。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。使用随机效应模型计算主要结果(风险比(RR),95% 置信区间(CIs))和次要结果(平均差(MD),95% 置信区间(CIs))的汇总估计值:病例与对照组逆行性月经子宫收缩模式的汇总风险;病例与对照组在所有月经周期阶段子宫收缩力连续测量值(收缩频率、幅度和速度)的汇总 MD:有九项研究符合纳入标准,其中大多数研究对患有子宫内膜异位症的妇女进行了评估。与对照组相比,子宫内膜异位症妇女在月经期间发生逆行性子宫收缩的风险增加(RR,8.63;95% CI,3.24-22.95;I2=0%)。病例与对照组在月经期和黄体期收缩频率的汇总 MD 分别为 0.82(95% CI,0.13-1.52;I2=18.61%)和 0.52(95% CI,0.22-0.83;I2=27.18%)。卵泡期和围排卵期的结果差异较大。据报道,患有子宫内膜异位症或腺肌症的妇女在所有月经周期阶段的收缩幅度都较高。由于数据较少,尤其是子宫腺肌症的数据,大多数比较的证据确定性被评为低:子宫内膜异位症患者月经逆行的风险增加了约 9 倍,这支持了月经逆行在其发病机制中的潜在作用。子宫收缩力异常可能并不局限于月经期,它可能是导致子宫内膜异位症及相关症状(包括痛经和不孕症)发生的一个机械性因素,而子宫腺肌症的证据有限,但大多是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信