Aneuploidy rates and likelihood of obtaining a usable embryo for transfer among in vitro fertilization cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and aneuploidy compared with in vitro fertilization cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy alone.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.030
Rachel A Martel, Mabel B Lee, Alessia Schadwell, Mehrnaz Siavoshi, Lorna Kwan, Jenna Miller, Chelsea Leonard, Robert A Roman, Abigail Armstrong, Lindsay Kroener
{"title":"Aneuploidy rates and likelihood of obtaining a usable embryo for transfer among in vitro fertilization cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and aneuploidy compared with in vitro fertilization cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy alone.","authors":"Rachel A Martel, Mabel B Lee, Alessia Schadwell, Mehrnaz Siavoshi, Lorna Kwan, Jenna Miller, Chelsea Leonard, Robert A Roman, Abigail Armstrong, Lindsay Kroener","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare aneuploidy rates among in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and aneuploidy (PGT-A) compared with IVF cycles using PGT-A alone, and to determine the likelihood of obtaining at least one usable embryo in cycles using PGT-M+PGT-A compared with cycles using PGT-A alone.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single genetics laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>All IVF cycles for patients aged 18-45 undergoing PGT-A with or without concurrent PGT-M at a single genetics laboratory from November 2019 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Use of PGT-M+PGT-A vs. use of PGT-A alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Per cycle aneuploidy rate stratified by age, and per cycle likelihood of obtaining at least one usable embryo stratified by age and inheritance pattern of monogenic disease.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>A total of 72,522 IVF cycles were included; 4,255 cycles (5.9%) using PGT-M+PGT-A and 68,267 cycles (94.1%) using PGT-A alone. The PGT-M+PGT-A group was younger than the PGT-A alone group (<35 years old: 56.1% vs. 30.5%). The majority of PGT-M cycles were performed for autosomal dominant pathogenic variants (42.4%), followed by autosomal recessive (36.5%), X-linked dominant (13.3%), and X-linked recessive (7.5%). The median number of embryos biopsied was higher in PGT-A alone compared with PGT-M+PGT-A cycles for patients aged <35, but it was equivalent in all other age groups. Age stratified aneuploidy rates did not significantly differ between PGT-M+PGT-A compared with PGT-A alone cycles. The probability of having a usable embryo declined with increasing age across all inheritance patterns. Compared with PGT-A alone, PGT-M+PGT-A cycles for patients aged ≤40 across all inheritance patterns were significantly less likely to yield a usable embryo, except in cycles for autosomal recessive diseases in the 38-40 age group and X-linked recessive diseases in the 35-37 age group. There were no consistent differences seen between groups in patients over 40. Cycles for patients with autosomal dominant diseases had the lowest likelihood of yielding a usable embryo for patients aged <43.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>In vitro fertilization cycles using PGT-M+PGT-A have similar age-specific aneuploidy rates to those using PGT-A alone. Cycles for patients ≤40 using PGT-M+PGT-A are significantly less likely to yield a usable embryo compared with those using PGT-A alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"993-1001"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.07.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare aneuploidy rates among in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and aneuploidy (PGT-A) compared with IVF cycles using PGT-A alone, and to determine the likelihood of obtaining at least one usable embryo in cycles using PGT-M+PGT-A compared with cycles using PGT-A alone.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single genetics laboratory.

Patient(s): All IVF cycles for patients aged 18-45 undergoing PGT-A with or without concurrent PGT-M at a single genetics laboratory from November 2019 to March 2023.

Intervention(s): Use of PGT-M+PGT-A vs. use of PGT-A alone.

Main outcome measure(s): Per cycle aneuploidy rate stratified by age, and per cycle likelihood of obtaining at least one usable embryo stratified by age and inheritance pattern of monogenic disease.

Result(s): A total of 72,522 IVF cycles were included; 4,255 cycles (5.9%) using PGT-M+PGT-A and 68,267 cycles (94.1%) using PGT-A alone. The PGT-M+PGT-A group was younger than the PGT-A alone group (<35 years old: 56.1% vs. 30.5%). The majority of PGT-M cycles were performed for autosomal dominant pathogenic variants (42.4%), followed by autosomal recessive (36.5%), X-linked dominant (13.3%), and X-linked recessive (7.5%). The median number of embryos biopsied was higher in PGT-A alone compared with PGT-M+PGT-A cycles for patients aged <35, but it was equivalent in all other age groups. Age stratified aneuploidy rates did not significantly differ between PGT-M+PGT-A compared with PGT-A alone cycles. The probability of having a usable embryo declined with increasing age across all inheritance patterns. Compared with PGT-A alone, PGT-M+PGT-A cycles for patients aged ≤40 across all inheritance patterns were significantly less likely to yield a usable embryo, except in cycles for autosomal recessive diseases in the 38-40 age group and X-linked recessive diseases in the 35-37 age group. There were no consistent differences seen between groups in patients over 40. Cycles for patients with autosomal dominant diseases had the lowest likelihood of yielding a usable embryo for patients aged <43.

Conclusion(s): In vitro fertilization cycles using PGT-M+PGT-A have similar age-specific aneuploidy rates to those using PGT-A alone. Cycles for patients ≤40 using PGT-M+PGT-A are significantly less likely to yield a usable embryo compared with those using PGT-A alone.

与单独使用 PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期相比,使用 PGT-M+PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期的非整倍体率和获得可移植胚胎的可能性。
目的:比较使用单基因遗传病植入前基因检测(PGT-M)和非整倍体检测(PGT-A)的试管婴儿周期与仅使用 PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期的非整倍体率,并确定使用 PGT-M+PGT-A 的周期与仅使用 PGT-A 的周期获得至少一个可用胚胎的可能性:设计:回顾性队列研究:暴露:使用PGT-M+PGT-A与单独使用PGT-A的主要结局指标:按年龄分层的每周期非整倍体率,以及按年龄和单基因疾病遗传模式分层的每周期获得至少一个可用胚胎的可能性 结果:共纳入72,522个IVF周期;4,255个周期(5.9%)使用PGT-M+PGT-A,68,267个周期(94.1%)单独使用PGT-A。PGT-M+PGT-A组比单纯PGT-A组年轻(结论:PGT-M+PGT-A组比单纯PGT-A组年轻):使用 PGT-M+PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期与仅使用 PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期具有相似的特定年龄非整倍体率。与单独使用 PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期相比,≤ 40 岁患者使用 PGT-M+PGT-A 的试管婴儿周期获得可用胚胎的几率要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信