Performance of triggers in detecting hospitalizations related to drug-induced respiratory disorders in older adults: A pilot cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clinics Pub Date : 2024-07-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100449
Geovana Schiavo, Marcela Forgerini, Fabiana Rossi Varallo, Bruna Carolina Corrêa, Maisa Cabete Pereira Salvetti, Patrícia de Carvalho Mastroianni
{"title":"Performance of triggers in detecting hospitalizations related to drug-induced respiratory disorders in older adults: A pilot cross-sectional study.","authors":"Geovana Schiavo, Marcela Forgerini, Fabiana Rossi Varallo, Bruna Carolina Corrêa, Maisa Cabete Pereira Salvetti, Patrícia de Carvalho Mastroianni","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no gold-standard trigger for detecting drug-induced respiratory disorders, a type of Adverse Drug Event (ADE) with high morbimortality, particularly in older people.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To propose and evaluate the performance of triggers for detecting hospitalizations related to drug-induced respiratory disorders in older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted with older people (age ≥ 60) admitted to a Brazilian hospital. Electronic chart documentation was screened using ICD-10 codes; Global Trigger Tool (GTT); and drugs potentially associated with respiratory disorders. A chart and medication review were conducted to perform the causality assessment using the instrument developed by the World Health Organization. The performance of triggers was evaluated by the Positive Predictive Value (PPV), with values ≥ 0.20 indicating good performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 221 older people, 72 were eligible. Potential drug-induced dyspnea and/or cough were detected in six older people (6/72), corresponding to a prevalence of 8.3 %. The overall PPV of the triggers was 0.14, with abrupt medication stop (PPV = 1.00), codeine (PPV = 1.00), captopril (PPV = 0.33), and carvedilol (PPV = 0.33) showing good performance. Two triggers were proposed for detecting therapeutic ineffectiveness associated with respiratory disorders: furosemide (PPV = 0.23) and prednisone (PPV = 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The triggers enabled the identification that one in 12 hospitalizations was related to drug-induced respiratory. Although good performance was observed in the application of triggers, additional investigations are needed to assess the feasibility of incorporating them into clinical practice for the screening, detection, management, and reporting of these ADEs, which are considered to be underreported and difficult to detect.</p>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"79 ","pages":"100449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no gold-standard trigger for detecting drug-induced respiratory disorders, a type of Adverse Drug Event (ADE) with high morbimortality, particularly in older people.

Objective: To propose and evaluate the performance of triggers for detecting hospitalizations related to drug-induced respiratory disorders in older people.

Methods: A pilot cross-sectional study was conducted with older people (age ≥ 60) admitted to a Brazilian hospital. Electronic chart documentation was screened using ICD-10 codes; Global Trigger Tool (GTT); and drugs potentially associated with respiratory disorders. A chart and medication review were conducted to perform the causality assessment using the instrument developed by the World Health Organization. The performance of triggers was evaluated by the Positive Predictive Value (PPV), with values ≥ 0.20 indicating good performance.

Results: Among 221 older people, 72 were eligible. Potential drug-induced dyspnea and/or cough were detected in six older people (6/72), corresponding to a prevalence of 8.3 %. The overall PPV of the triggers was 0.14, with abrupt medication stop (PPV = 1.00), codeine (PPV = 1.00), captopril (PPV = 0.33), and carvedilol (PPV = 0.33) showing good performance. Two triggers were proposed for detecting therapeutic ineffectiveness associated with respiratory disorders: furosemide (PPV = 0.23) and prednisone (PPV = 0.20).

Conclusion: The triggers enabled the identification that one in 12 hospitalizations was related to drug-induced respiratory. Although good performance was observed in the application of triggers, additional investigations are needed to assess the feasibility of incorporating them into clinical practice for the screening, detection, management, and reporting of these ADEs, which are considered to be underreported and difficult to detect.

触发器在检测老年人因药物引起的呼吸系统疾病住院方面的性能:一项试点横断面研究。
背景:目前还没有检测药物引起的呼吸系统疾病的金标准触发器:药物引起的呼吸系统疾病是一种死亡率很高的药物不良事件(ADE),尤其是在老年人中,目前还没有金标准触发器来检测这种疾病:目的:提出并评估用于检测老年人因药物引起的呼吸系统疾病而住院的触发器的性能:在巴西一家医院住院的老年人(年龄≥ 60 岁)中开展了一项试点横断面研究。使用 ICD-10 编码、全球触发工具 (GTT) 和可能与呼吸系统疾病相关的药物对电子病历文件进行筛选。使用世界卫生组织开发的工具对病历和药物进行审查,以进行因果关系评估。触发器的性能以阳性预测值(PPV)进行评估,数值≥0.20表示性能良好:在 221 名老年人中,有 72 人符合条件。6名老年人(6/72)被检测出可能由药物引起的呼吸困难和/或咳嗽,发病率为8.3%。触发器的总体 PPV 为 0.14,其中突然停药(PPV = 1.00)、可待因(PPV = 1.00)、卡托普利(PPV = 0.33)和卡维地洛(PPV = 0.33)表现良好。为检测与呼吸系统疾病相关的治疗无效提出了两个触发因素:呋塞米(PPV = 0.23)和泼尼松(PPV = 0.20):该触发器可确定每 12 例住院病例中就有 1 例与药物引起的呼吸系统疾病有关。虽然触发器的应用效果良好,但还需要进行更多的调查,以评估将触发器纳入临床实践的可行性,从而筛查、检测、管理和报告这些被认为报告不足且难以检测的 ADE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信