Bloodstream infection: Derivation and validation of a reliable and multidimensional prognostic score based on a machine learning model (BLISCO).

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Marta Camici, Benedetta Gottardelli, Tommaso Novellino, Carlotta Masciocchi, Silvia Lamonica, Rita Murri
{"title":"Bloodstream infection: Derivation and validation of a reliable and multidimensional prognostic score based on a machine learning model (BLISCO).","authors":"Marta Camici, Benedetta Gottardelli, Tommaso Novellino, Carlotta Masciocchi, Silvia Lamonica, Rita Murri","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A bloodstream infection (BSI) prognostic score applicable at the time of blood culture collection is missing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 4,327 patients with BSIs were included, divided into a derivation (80%) and a validation dataset (20%). Forty-two variables among host-related, demographic, epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory extracted from the electronic health records were analyzed. Logistic regression was chosen for predictive scoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 14-day mortality model included age, body temperature, blood urea nitrogen, respiratory insufficiency, platelet count, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and consciousness status: a score of ≥ 6 was correlated to a 14-day mortality rate of 15% with a sensitivity of 0.742, a specificity of 0.727, and an area under the curve of 0.783. The 30-day mortality model further included cardiovascular diseases: a score of ≥ 6 predicting 30-day mortality rate of 15% with a sensitivity of 0.691, a specificity of 0.699, and an area under the curve of 0.697.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A quick mortality score could represent a valid support for prognosis assessment and resources prioritizing for patients with BSIs not admitted in the intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.07.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A bloodstream infection (BSI) prognostic score applicable at the time of blood culture collection is missing.

Methods: In total, 4,327 patients with BSIs were included, divided into a derivation (80%) and a validation dataset (20%). Forty-two variables among host-related, demographic, epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory extracted from the electronic health records were analyzed. Logistic regression was chosen for predictive scoring.

Results: The 14-day mortality model included age, body temperature, blood urea nitrogen, respiratory insufficiency, platelet count, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and consciousness status: a score of ≥ 6 was correlated to a 14-day mortality rate of 15% with a sensitivity of 0.742, a specificity of 0.727, and an area under the curve of 0.783. The 30-day mortality model further included cardiovascular diseases: a score of ≥ 6 predicting 30-day mortality rate of 15% with a sensitivity of 0.691, a specificity of 0.699, and an area under the curve of 0.697.

Conclusions: A quick mortality score could represent a valid support for prognosis assessment and resources prioritizing for patients with BSIs not admitted in the intensive care unit.

血流感染:基于机器学习模型(BLISCO)的可靠多维预后评分的推导与验证。
背景:目前尚无适用于血培养采集时的血流感染(BSI)预后评分:目前尚无适用于血培养采集时的血流感染(BSI)预后评分:方法:纳入 4327 名 BSI 患者,分为推导数据集(80%)和验证数据集(20%)。分析了从电子病历中提取的与宿主相关的、人口统计学、流行病学、临床、实验室等 42 个变量。在对多个机器学习模型进行测试后,选择逻辑回归进行预测评分。使用灵敏度、特异性和预测值评估了准确性:14天死亡率模型包括年龄、体温、血尿素氮、呼吸功能不全、血小板计数、高敏C反应蛋白和意识状态:得分≥6与14天死亡率15%相关,灵敏度为0.742,特异性为0.727,AUC为0.783。30 天死亡率模型还包括心血管疾病:得分≥ 6 可预测 15%的 30 天死亡率,灵敏度为 0.691,特异度为 0.699,AUC 为 0.697:快速、易于评估的死亡率评分可有效支持对未入住重症监护室的 BSI 患者进行预后评估和资源优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信