Comparative assessment of pantothenic, aspartic, ascorbic and tartaric acids assisted Pb-phytoextraction by sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).

IF 4.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Asif Ghafoor, Fahad Shafiq, Sumera Anwar, Lixin Zhang, Muhammad Ashraf
{"title":"Comparative assessment of pantothenic, aspartic, ascorbic and tartaric acids assisted Pb-phytoextraction by sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).","authors":"Asif Ghafoor, Fahad Shafiq, Sumera Anwar, Lixin Zhang, Muhammad Ashraf","doi":"10.1007/s10534-024-00619-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phytoextraction of lead (Pb) is a challenging task due to its extremely low mobility within soil and plant systems. In this study, we tested the influence of some novel chelating agents for Pb-phytoextraction using sunflower. The Pb was applied at control (0.0278 mM) and 4.826 mM Pb as Pb(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> through soil-spiking. After 10 days of Pb addition, four different organic ligands (aspartic, ascorbic, tartaric, and pantothenic acids) were added to the soil at 1 mM concentration each. respectively. In the absence of any chelate, sunflower plants grown at 4.826 mM Pb level accumulated Pb concentrations up to 104 µg g<sup>-1</sup> DW in roots, whereas 64 µg g<sup>-1</sup> DW in shoot. By contrast, tartaric acid promoted significantly Pb accumulation in roots (191 µg g<sup>-1</sup> DW; + 45.5%) and shoot (131.6 µg g<sup>-1</sup> DW; + 51.3%). Pantothenic acid also resulted in a significant Pb-uptake in the sunflower shoots (123 µg g<sup>-1</sup> DW; + 47.9%) and in roots (177.3 µg g<sup>-1</sup> DW; + 41.3%). The least effective amongst the chelates tested was aspartic acid, but it still contributed to + 40.1% more Pb accumulation in the sunflower root and shoots. In addition, plant growth, biochemical, and ionomic parameters were positively regulated by the organic chelates used. Especially, an increase in leaf Ca, P, and S was evident in Pb-stressed plants in response to chelates. These results highlight that the use of biocompatible organic chelates positively alters plant physio-biochemical traits contributing to higher Pb-sequestration in sunflower plant parts.</p>","PeriodicalId":491,"journal":{"name":"Biometals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometals","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-024-00619-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phytoextraction of lead (Pb) is a challenging task due to its extremely low mobility within soil and plant systems. In this study, we tested the influence of some novel chelating agents for Pb-phytoextraction using sunflower. The Pb was applied at control (0.0278 mM) and 4.826 mM Pb as Pb(NO3)2 through soil-spiking. After 10 days of Pb addition, four different organic ligands (aspartic, ascorbic, tartaric, and pantothenic acids) were added to the soil at 1 mM concentration each. respectively. In the absence of any chelate, sunflower plants grown at 4.826 mM Pb level accumulated Pb concentrations up to 104 µg g-1 DW in roots, whereas 64 µg g-1 DW in shoot. By contrast, tartaric acid promoted significantly Pb accumulation in roots (191 µg g-1 DW; + 45.5%) and shoot (131.6 µg g-1 DW; + 51.3%). Pantothenic acid also resulted in a significant Pb-uptake in the sunflower shoots (123 µg g-1 DW; + 47.9%) and in roots (177.3 µg g-1 DW; + 41.3%). The least effective amongst the chelates tested was aspartic acid, but it still contributed to + 40.1% more Pb accumulation in the sunflower root and shoots. In addition, plant growth, biochemical, and ionomic parameters were positively regulated by the organic chelates used. Especially, an increase in leaf Ca, P, and S was evident in Pb-stressed plants in response to chelates. These results highlight that the use of biocompatible organic chelates positively alters plant physio-biochemical traits contributing to higher Pb-sequestration in sunflower plant parts.

Abstract Image

向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)对泛酸、天门冬氨酸、抗坏血酸和酒石酸辅助铅植物萃取的比较评估。
由于铅(Pb)在土壤和植物系统中的迁移率极低,因此植物萃取铅(Pb)是一项具有挑战性的任务。在这项研究中,我们利用向日葵测试了一些新型螯合剂对铅植物萃取的影响。通过在土壤中添加 Pb(NO3)2 的方式,在对照浓度(0.0278 mM)和 4.826 mM 的浓度下添加铅。添加铅 10 天后,向土壤中添加四种不同的有机配体(天冬氨酸、抗坏血酸、酒石酸和泛酸),浓度分别为 1 mM。在没有任何螯合剂的情况下,向日葵植株在 4.826 mM 铅水平下生长时,根部积累的铅浓度高达 104 µg g-1 DW,而在芽中则为 64 µg g-1 DW。相比之下,酒石酸能显著促进根部(191 µg g-1 DW;+ 45.5%)和芽部(131.6 µg g-1 DW;+ 51.3%)的铅积累。泛酸也导致向日葵芽(123 µg g-1 DW;+ 47.9%)和根(177.3 µg g-1 DW;+ 41.3%)对铅的大量吸收。在测试的螯合剂中,效果最差的是天门冬氨酸,但它仍然使向日葵根和芽中的铅积累增加了 + 40.1%。此外,所使用的有机螯合剂对植物的生长、生化和离子参数都有积极的调节作用。特别是,铅胁迫植物的叶片钙、磷和硒含量在螯合物的作用下明显增加。这些结果突出表明,使用生物相容性有机螯合物可积极改变植物的生理生化特征,有助于提高向日葵植株各部分对铅的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometals
Biometals 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioMetals is the only established journal to feature the important role of metal ions in chemistry, biology, biochemistry, environmental science, and medicine. BioMetals is an international, multidisciplinary journal singularly devoted to the rapid publication of the fundamental advances of both basic and applied research in this field. BioMetals offers a forum for innovative research and clinical results on the structure and function of: - metal ions - metal chelates, - siderophores, - metal-containing proteins - biominerals in all biosystems. - BioMetals rapidly publishes original articles and reviews. BioMetals is a journal for metals researchers who practice in medicine, biochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, microbiology, cell biology, chemistry, and plant physiology who are based academic, industrial and government laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信