Influential Factors Affecting the Intention to Utilize Advance Care Plans (ACPs) in Thailand and Indonesia

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Societies Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.3390/soc14080134
Irianna Futri, Chavis Ketkaew, Phaninee Naruetharadhol
{"title":"Influential Factors Affecting the Intention to Utilize Advance Care Plans (ACPs) in Thailand and Indonesia","authors":"Irianna Futri, Chavis Ketkaew, Phaninee Naruetharadhol","doi":"10.3390/soc14080134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demographic shifts resulting from population aging are evident globally, including in Southeast Asia, Thailand, and Indonesia. The relevance of advance care plans is becoming increasingly apparent as the worldwide demographic transforms due to aging. This study sought to investigate the factors influencing the use and implementation of advance care plans (ACPs) using the health belief model (HBM) and technology acceptance model (TAM). This study selected a sample of individuals aged 30–60 in Indonesia and Thailand based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study utilized the purposive random sampling method, integrating aspects of purposive and random selection. A total of 532 questionnaires were distributed via an online form, and 472 were obtained after data cleaning. Most respondents to this survey came from Indonesia, comprising 238 out of 472 respondents (50.4%), and from Thailand, comprising 49.5%; most respondents were women who were between 36 and 40 years old, and most reported graduating with a bachelor’s degree. A significant construct influences the use of advance care plans, i.e., perceived barriers. The perceived barrier (PBA) construct included data security, accessibility, and language barriers. In summary, overcoming existing barriers can indirectly increase the benefits of advance care plans. The results show that perceived usefulness (β = 0.189, p < 0.001), perceived ease of use (β = 0.150, p < 0.01), perceived susceptibility (β = 0.153, p < 0.01), perceived severity (β = 0.105, p < 0.05), and perceived benefits (β = 0.241, p < 0.001) all had significant positive effects on behavioral intention. In contrast, health motivation (β = 0.073, p = 0.100) and perceived barriers (β = 0.034, p = 0.134) did not show significant relationships with behavioral intention in Indonesia and Thailand, offering insights into both countries’ development strategies and the promotion of advance care plans with media as the technology.","PeriodicalId":21795,"journal":{"name":"Societies","volume":"358 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demographic shifts resulting from population aging are evident globally, including in Southeast Asia, Thailand, and Indonesia. The relevance of advance care plans is becoming increasingly apparent as the worldwide demographic transforms due to aging. This study sought to investigate the factors influencing the use and implementation of advance care plans (ACPs) using the health belief model (HBM) and technology acceptance model (TAM). This study selected a sample of individuals aged 30–60 in Indonesia and Thailand based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study utilized the purposive random sampling method, integrating aspects of purposive and random selection. A total of 532 questionnaires were distributed via an online form, and 472 were obtained after data cleaning. Most respondents to this survey came from Indonesia, comprising 238 out of 472 respondents (50.4%), and from Thailand, comprising 49.5%; most respondents were women who were between 36 and 40 years old, and most reported graduating with a bachelor’s degree. A significant construct influences the use of advance care plans, i.e., perceived barriers. The perceived barrier (PBA) construct included data security, accessibility, and language barriers. In summary, overcoming existing barriers can indirectly increase the benefits of advance care plans. The results show that perceived usefulness (β = 0.189, p < 0.001), perceived ease of use (β = 0.150, p < 0.01), perceived susceptibility (β = 0.153, p < 0.01), perceived severity (β = 0.105, p < 0.05), and perceived benefits (β = 0.241, p < 0.001) all had significant positive effects on behavioral intention. In contrast, health motivation (β = 0.073, p = 0.100) and perceived barriers (β = 0.034, p = 0.134) did not show significant relationships with behavioral intention in Indonesia and Thailand, offering insights into both countries’ development strategies and the promotion of advance care plans with media as the technology.
泰国和印度尼西亚影响使用预先护理计划(ACP)意愿的影响因素
人口老龄化导致的人口结构变化在全球范围内都很明显,包括东南亚、泰国和印度尼西亚。随着老龄化导致的全球人口结构转变,预先护理计划的相关性正变得越来越明显。本研究试图利用健康信念模型(HBM)和技术接受模型(TAM)调查影响使用和实施预先护理计划(ACP)的因素。本研究根据既定的纳入和排除标准,在印度尼西亚和泰国选择了 30-60 岁的个人作为样本。研究采用了目的性随机抽样方法,综合了目的性抽样和随机抽样的优点。通过在线表格共发放了 532 份问卷,经过数据清理后获得了 472 份问卷。本次调查的大多数受访者来自印度尼西亚,在 472 位受访者中占 238 位(50.4%),来自泰国的受访者占 49.5%;大多数受访者为 36 至 40 岁之间的女性,大多数受访者表示毕业于大学本科。影响预先护理计划使用的一个重要因素是感知障碍。感知障碍(PBA)结构包括数据安全性、可及性和语言障碍。总之,克服现有障碍可以间接增加预先护理计划的益处。结果显示,感知有用性(β = 0.189,p < 0.001)、感知易用性(β = 0.150,p < 0.01)、感知易感性(β = 0.153,p < 0.01)、感知严重性(β = 0.105,p < 0.05)和感知益处(β = 0.241,p < 0.001)都对行为意向有显著的正向影响。相比之下,印尼和泰国的健康动机(β = 0.073,p = 0.100)和感知障碍(β = 0.034,p = 0.134)与行为意向无明显关系,这为两国的发展战略以及以媒体为技术推广预先护理计划提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Societies
Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信