Critical evaluation and recalculation of current systematic reviews with meta-analysis on the effects of acute and chronic stretching on passive properties and passive peak torque

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Konstantin Warneke, Lars Hubertus Lohmann, Gerit Plöschberger, Andreas Konrad
{"title":"Critical evaluation and recalculation of current systematic reviews with meta-analysis on the effects of acute and chronic stretching on passive properties and passive peak torque","authors":"Konstantin Warneke, Lars Hubertus Lohmann, Gerit Plöschberger, Andreas Konrad","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05564-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Muscle, tendon, and muscle–tendon unit (MTU) stiffness as well as passive peak torque (PPT) or delayed stretching pain sensation are typical explanatory approaches for stretching adaptations. However, in literature, differences in the study inclusion, as well as applying meta-analytical models without accounting for intrastudy dependency of multiple and heteroscedasticity of data bias the current evidence. Furthermore, most of the recent analyses neglected to investigate PPT adaptations and further moderators.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The presented review used the recommended meta-analytical calculation method to investigate the effects of stretching on stiffness as well as on passive torque parameters using subgroup analyses for stretching types, stretching duration, and supervision.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Chronic stretching reduced muscle stiffness ( − 0.38, <i>p</i> = 0.01) overall, and also for the supervised ( − 0.49, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and long static stretching interventions ( − 0.61, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while the unsupervised and short duration subgroups did not reach the level of significance (<i>p</i> = 0.21, 0.29). No effects were observed for tendon stiffness or for subgroups (e.g., long-stretching durations). Chronic PPT (0.55, <i>p</i> = 0.005) in end ROM increased. Only long-stretching durations sufficiently decreased muscle stiffness acutely. No effects could be observed for acute PPT.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>While partially in accordance with previous literature, the results underline the relevance of long-stretching durations when inducing changes in passive properties. Only four acute PPT in end ROM studies were eligible, while a large number were excluded as they provided mathematical models and/or lacked control conditions, calling for further randomized controlled trials on acute PPT effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05564-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Muscle, tendon, and muscle–tendon unit (MTU) stiffness as well as passive peak torque (PPT) or delayed stretching pain sensation are typical explanatory approaches for stretching adaptations. However, in literature, differences in the study inclusion, as well as applying meta-analytical models without accounting for intrastudy dependency of multiple and heteroscedasticity of data bias the current evidence. Furthermore, most of the recent analyses neglected to investigate PPT adaptations and further moderators.

Methods

The presented review used the recommended meta-analytical calculation method to investigate the effects of stretching on stiffness as well as on passive torque parameters using subgroup analyses for stretching types, stretching duration, and supervision.

Results

Chronic stretching reduced muscle stiffness ( − 0.38, p = 0.01) overall, and also for the supervised ( − 0.49, p = 0.004) and long static stretching interventions ( − 0.61, p < 0.001), while the unsupervised and short duration subgroups did not reach the level of significance (p = 0.21, 0.29). No effects were observed for tendon stiffness or for subgroups (e.g., long-stretching durations). Chronic PPT (0.55, p = 0.005) in end ROM increased. Only long-stretching durations sufficiently decreased muscle stiffness acutely. No effects could be observed for acute PPT.

Conclusion

While partially in accordance with previous literature, the results underline the relevance of long-stretching durations when inducing changes in passive properties. Only four acute PPT in end ROM studies were eligible, while a large number were excluded as they provided mathematical models and/or lacked control conditions, calling for further randomized controlled trials on acute PPT effects.

Abstract Image

通过荟萃分析对当前关于急性和慢性拉伸对被动特性和被动峰值扭矩影响的系统性综述进行批判性评估和重新计算
目的肌肉、肌腱和肌肉肌腱单元(MTU)僵硬度以及被动峰值扭矩(PPT)或延迟拉伸痛觉是拉伸适应性的典型解释方法。然而,在文献中,研究纳入方面的差异,以及在应用荟萃分析模型时未考虑研究间的多重依赖性和数据的异方差性,使目前的证据存在偏差。方法本综述采用推荐的荟萃分析计算方法,通过对拉伸类型、拉伸持续时间和监督进行分组分析,研究拉伸对僵硬度以及被动扭矩参数的影响。结果 慢性拉伸总体上降低了肌肉僵硬度(- 0.38,p = 0.01),有监督的拉伸干预(- 0.49,p = 0.004)和长时间静态拉伸干预(- 0.61,p <0.001)也降低了肌肉僵硬度,而无监督和持续时间短的亚组没有达到显著性水平(p = 0.21,0.29)。肌腱僵硬度或亚组(如长拉伸持续时间)均未观察到影响。末端 ROM 的慢性 PPT(0.55,p = 0.005)有所增加。只有长拉伸持续时间能充分降低急性肌肉僵硬度。结论虽然与之前的文献部分相符,但结果强调了长拉伸持续时间在诱导被动特性变化时的相关性。符合条件的只有四项末端 ROM 中的急性 PPT 研究,而大量研究因提供数学模型和/或缺乏对照条件而被排除在外,这就要求对急性 PPT 的效果进行进一步的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信