Effect of injection timings and injection pressure on knock mitigation with a compression stroke injection of hydrous ethanol in spark ignition

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
John Gandolfo, Benjamin Lawler, Brian Gainey
{"title":"Effect of injection timings and injection pressure on knock mitigation with a compression stroke injection of hydrous ethanol in spark ignition","authors":"John Gandolfo, Benjamin Lawler, Brian Gainey","doi":"10.1177/14680874241258533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct injection fuel systems provide precise control over the amount of fuel injected and can enable higher compression ratio operation and earlier combustion phasing under knock-limited operation, particularly for fuels with a high cooling potential like hydrous ethanol, a blend of 92% ethanol and 8% water. Moving a portion of the total fuel mass from an intake stroke injection to a compression stroke injection can provide a knock suppression benefit, which can enable more efficient operation. In this work, the influence of injection pressure on this split injection spark ignition strategy is examined. The effect of injection pressure on two intake stroke injections were characterized, with an injection pressure of 200 bar improving combustion efficiency by ∼3 percentage points and advancing knock-limited CA50 by 1 crank angle degree over an injection pressure of 30 bar. Then, a compression stroke injection was introduced and swept into the compression stroke while maintaining the two intake stroke injections. Direct injections at an injection pressure of 30 bar enabled a small knock intensity reduction of ∼20%, whereas an injection pressure of 200 bar enabled a larger reduction of ∼90% in knock intensity. The spark timing advance permitted by the reduction in knock intensity with a compression stroke injection timing of −80 degrees after top dead center was 0.3 and 2.0 degrees at an injection pressure of 30 and 200 bar, respectively. Then, the second intake stroke injection was varied at 200 bar to evaluate how the stratification profile prior to the compression stroke injection impacted its ability to reduce knock intensity. It was found that compression stroke injections with an early second intake stroke injection was effective at reducing knock intensity throughout the compression stroke. As the second intake stroke injection was retarded, the early compression stroke injections became less effective at suppressing knock.","PeriodicalId":14034,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engine Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engine Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874241258533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct injection fuel systems provide precise control over the amount of fuel injected and can enable higher compression ratio operation and earlier combustion phasing under knock-limited operation, particularly for fuels with a high cooling potential like hydrous ethanol, a blend of 92% ethanol and 8% water. Moving a portion of the total fuel mass from an intake stroke injection to a compression stroke injection can provide a knock suppression benefit, which can enable more efficient operation. In this work, the influence of injection pressure on this split injection spark ignition strategy is examined. The effect of injection pressure on two intake stroke injections were characterized, with an injection pressure of 200 bar improving combustion efficiency by ∼3 percentage points and advancing knock-limited CA50 by 1 crank angle degree over an injection pressure of 30 bar. Then, a compression stroke injection was introduced and swept into the compression stroke while maintaining the two intake stroke injections. Direct injections at an injection pressure of 30 bar enabled a small knock intensity reduction of ∼20%, whereas an injection pressure of 200 bar enabled a larger reduction of ∼90% in knock intensity. The spark timing advance permitted by the reduction in knock intensity with a compression stroke injection timing of −80 degrees after top dead center was 0.3 and 2.0 degrees at an injection pressure of 30 and 200 bar, respectively. Then, the second intake stroke injection was varied at 200 bar to evaluate how the stratification profile prior to the compression stroke injection impacted its ability to reduce knock intensity. It was found that compression stroke injections with an early second intake stroke injection was effective at reducing knock intensity throughout the compression stroke. As the second intake stroke injection was retarded, the early compression stroke injections became less effective at suppressing knock.
火花点火压缩冲程喷射含水乙醇时,喷射时间和喷射压力对缓解爆震的影响
直接喷射燃油系统可以精确控制喷射的燃油量,在爆震受限的情况下,可以实现更高的压缩比操作和更早的燃烧阶段,特别是对于像含水乙醇(一种由 92% 的乙醇和 8% 的水混合而成的燃料)这样具有高冷却潜力的燃料。将总燃料质量的一部分从进气冲程喷射转移到压缩冲程喷射,可以起到抑制爆震的作用,从而实现更高效的运行。在这项工作中,研究了喷射压力对这种分离喷射火花点火策略的影响。喷射压力对两个进气冲程喷射的影响是有特征的,与 30 巴的喷射压力相比,200 巴的喷射压力可将燃烧效率提高 3 个百分点,并将限制爆震的 CA50 提前 1 个曲柄角度。然后,在保持两个进气冲程喷射的同时,引入了一个压缩冲程喷射,并扫入压缩冲程。在 30 巴的喷射压力下,直接喷射可将爆震强度降低 20%,而在 200 巴的喷射压力下,爆震强度可降低 90%。在喷射压力为 30 巴和 200 巴时,压缩冲程喷射正时为上死点后 -80 度,为降低爆震强度所允许的火花正时提前量分别为 0.3 度和 2.0 度。然后,在 200 巴的压力下改变第二个进气冲程的喷射压力,以评估压缩冲程喷射前的分层情况如何影响其降低爆震强度的能力。结果发现,在压缩冲程喷射时,提前进行第二个进气冲程喷射可有效降低整个压缩冲程的爆震强度。随着第二个进气冲程喷射的延缓,早期压缩冲程喷射在抑制爆震方面的效果越来越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Engine Research
International Journal of Engine Research 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engine Research publishes high quality papers on experimental and analytical studies of engine technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信