Immunoadsorption and Plasma Exchange are Comparable in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies or Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Removal Kinetics

Abstract

Introduction

Apheresis allows the fast removal of autoantibodies in anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease, and in severe antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. The CINEVAS study tested whether immunoadsorption (IA) allowed a faster removal of ANCA and/or anti-GBM antibodies than plasma exchanges (PEx).

Methods

CINEVAS was a prospective multicenter study comparing IA to PEx in consecutive patients with ANCA and/or anti-GBM vasculitides. The primary objective was the reduction rate in autoantibody titers between the beginning of the first and the end of the seventh apheresis session. Secondary objectives were number of sessions needed to obtain desired reduction rates; reduction rates of total Ig levels; tolerance of sessions; and patients’ outcome.

Results

The results of 38 patients (16 treated with IA and 22 with PEx), and 43 autoantibodies, were analyzed. There was no difference in the reduction rates in autoantibody titers between IA and PEx over 7 sessions (respectively 98% vs. 96%, P = 0.39). The numbers of sessions needed to obtain undetectable autoantibodies, or 50%, 75%, or 90% reductions, did not differ between techniques. Greater reduction rates of autoantibodies were observed when plasma was separated by filtration compared to centrifugation, with IA and PEx. IA allowed a greater reduction in total IgG levels, and better preservation of total IgA and IgM levels than PEx. PEx sessions required higher volumes of plasma, IA sessions higher volumes of citrate; IA sessions were longer.

Conclusions

IA and PEx were comparable in ANCA or anti-GBM removal kinetics, despite a faster reduction in total IgG with IA.