Do the effects of sleep problems on cognitive function differ according to age in daytime workers?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shoichi Asaoka, Ritsuko Nishimura, Kenta Nozoe, Ryuichiro Yamamoto
{"title":"Do the effects of sleep problems on cognitive function differ according to age in daytime workers?","authors":"Shoichi Asaoka, Ritsuko Nishimura, Kenta Nozoe, Ryuichiro Yamamoto","doi":"10.1007/s41105-024-00546-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To examine whether the effects of low sleep quality, sleep deprivation, and chronotype on daytime cognitive function varied by age group. All data were collected online. We obtained the data from 366 employed people in their 20s, 40s, or 60s. The participants were required to fill out a questionnaire comprising of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, an Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire, and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, and perform the online Stroop task through the web browser on their own PC. The results of analyses of variance showed that people in their 20s had more of an evening chronotype, while those in their 20s and 40s experienced more sleep loss than those in their 60s. Stroop interference, reflecting decline in selective attention, was greater in people in their 60s. The results of structural equation modeling showed that sleep loss tended to relate to lower Stroop interference in people in their 20s. Additionally, people in their 60s exhibited a significant relationship between lower sleep quality and lower Stroop interference in the reaction time. At least in this study, interindividual differences in sleep loss, chronotype, and sleep quality did not have a strong effect on cognitive function measured using the online Stroop task in the 40s age group. However, people in their 20s with sleep loss and those in their 60s with lower sleep quality showed higher selective attention, the mechanism of which requires further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21896,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Biological Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-024-00546-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine whether the effects of low sleep quality, sleep deprivation, and chronotype on daytime cognitive function varied by age group. All data were collected online. We obtained the data from 366 employed people in their 20s, 40s, or 60s. The participants were required to fill out a questionnaire comprising of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, an Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire, and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, and perform the online Stroop task through the web browser on their own PC. The results of analyses of variance showed that people in their 20s had more of an evening chronotype, while those in their 20s and 40s experienced more sleep loss than those in their 60s. Stroop interference, reflecting decline in selective attention, was greater in people in their 60s. The results of structural equation modeling showed that sleep loss tended to relate to lower Stroop interference in people in their 20s. Additionally, people in their 60s exhibited a significant relationship between lower sleep quality and lower Stroop interference in the reaction time. At least in this study, interindividual differences in sleep loss, chronotype, and sleep quality did not have a strong effect on cognitive function measured using the online Stroop task in the 40s age group. However, people in their 20s with sleep loss and those in their 60s with lower sleep quality showed higher selective attention, the mechanism of which requires further research.

Abstract Image

日间工作者的睡眠问题对认知功能的影响是否因年龄而异?
研究低睡眠质量、睡眠不足和慢性型对日间认知功能的影响是否因年龄组而异。所有数据均通过网络收集。我们从 366 名 20 多岁、40 多岁或 60 多岁的就业者那里获得了数据。参与者需要填写一份问卷,其中包括匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、慕尼黑时间类型超简版问卷和卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表,并在自己的电脑上通过网络浏览器完成在线施特罗普任务。方差分析结果表明,20多岁的人更倾向于晚间时间型,而20多岁和40多岁的人比60多岁的人经历了更多的睡眠损失。反映选择性注意力下降的 Stroop 干扰在 60 多岁的人中更大。结构方程模型的结果表明,睡眠不足往往与 20 多岁人群的 Stroop 干扰较低有关。此外,60 多岁的人睡眠质量较低与反应时间中的 Stroop 干扰较低之间存在显著关系。至少在本研究中,睡眠不足、时间型和睡眠质量的个体差异对 40 多岁人群使用在线 Stroop 任务测量认知功能的影响不大。然而,20 多岁睡眠不足的人和 60 多岁睡眠质量较低的人表现出更高的选择性注意,其机制有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep and Biological Rhythms
Sleep and Biological Rhythms 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sleep and Biological Rhythms is a quarterly peer-reviewed publication dealing with medical treatments relating to sleep. The journal publishies original articles, short papers, commentaries and the occasional reviews. In scope the journal covers mechanisms of sleep and wakefullness from the ranging perspectives of basic science, medicine, dentistry, pharmacology, psychology, engineering, public health and related branches of the social sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信