The Intersectionality of Factors Predicting Co-occurring Disorders: A Decision Tree Model

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Saahoon Hong, Hea-Won Kim, Betty Walton, Maryanne Kaboi
{"title":"The Intersectionality of Factors Predicting Co-occurring Disorders: A Decision Tree Model","authors":"Saahoon Hong, Hea-Won Kim, Betty Walton, Maryanne Kaboi","doi":"10.1007/s11469-024-01358-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders (COD) face challenges, including accessing treatment, accurate diagnoses, and effective treatment for both disorders. This study aimed to develop a COD prediction model by examining the intersectionality of COD with race/ethnicity, age, gender identity, pandemic year, and behavioral health needs and strengths. Individuals aged 18 or older who participated in publicly funded behavioral health services (<i>N</i> = 22,629) were selected. Participants completed at least two Adult Needs and Strengths Assessments during 2019 and 2020, respectively. A chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) decision tree analysis was conducted to identify patterns that increased the likelihood of having COD. Among the decision tree analysis predictors, Involvement in Recovery emerged as the most critical factor influencing COD, with a predictor importance value (PIV) of 0.46. Other factors like Legal Involvement (PIV = 0.12), Decision-Making (PIV = 0.12), Parental/Caregiver Role (PIV = 0.11), Other Self-Harm (PIV = 0.10), and Criminal Behavior (PIV = 0.09) had progressively lower PIVs. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, and pandemic year did not show statistically significant associations with COD. The CHAID decision tree analysis provided insights into the dynamics of COD. It revealed that legal involvement played a crucial role in treatment engagement. Individuals with legal challenges were less likely to be involved in treatment. Individuals with COD displayed more complex behavioral health needs that significantly impaired their functioning compared to individuals with psychiatric disorders to inform the development of targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01358-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders (COD) face challenges, including accessing treatment, accurate diagnoses, and effective treatment for both disorders. This study aimed to develop a COD prediction model by examining the intersectionality of COD with race/ethnicity, age, gender identity, pandemic year, and behavioral health needs and strengths. Individuals aged 18 or older who participated in publicly funded behavioral health services (N = 22,629) were selected. Participants completed at least two Adult Needs and Strengths Assessments during 2019 and 2020, respectively. A chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) decision tree analysis was conducted to identify patterns that increased the likelihood of having COD. Among the decision tree analysis predictors, Involvement in Recovery emerged as the most critical factor influencing COD, with a predictor importance value (PIV) of 0.46. Other factors like Legal Involvement (PIV = 0.12), Decision-Making (PIV = 0.12), Parental/Caregiver Role (PIV = 0.11), Other Self-Harm (PIV = 0.10), and Criminal Behavior (PIV = 0.09) had progressively lower PIVs. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, and pandemic year did not show statistically significant associations with COD. The CHAID decision tree analysis provided insights into the dynamics of COD. It revealed that legal involvement played a crucial role in treatment engagement. Individuals with legal challenges were less likely to be involved in treatment. Individuals with COD displayed more complex behavioral health needs that significantly impaired their functioning compared to individuals with psychiatric disorders to inform the development of targeted interventions.

Abstract Image

预测并发症因素的交叉性:决策树模型
精神疾病和药物滥用并发症(COD)患者面临着各种挑战,包括获得治疗、准确诊断以及有效治疗这两种疾病。本研究旨在通过考察共存精神障碍与种族/民族、年龄、性别认同、流行年份以及行为健康需求和优势之间的交叉性,建立一个共存精神障碍预测模型。研究人员选取了参与政府资助的行为健康服务的 18 岁或 18 岁以上的个人(N = 22629)。参与者分别在 2019 年和 2020 年期间完成了至少两次成人需求和优势评估。我们进行了卡方自动交互检测(CHAID)决策树分析,以确定增加 COD 发生可能性的模式。在决策树分析预测因子中,参与康复是影响 COD 的最关键因素,预测因子重要性值 (PIV) 为 0.46。其他因素如法律参与(PIV = 0.12)、决策(PIV = 0.12)、父母/照顾者角色(PIV = 0.11)、其他自残行为(PIV = 0.10)和犯罪行为(PIV = 0.09)的预测重要性值逐渐降低。年龄、性别、种族/民族和大流行年份与 COD 的关系在统计学上并不显著。CHAID 决策树分析深入揭示了 COD 的动态变化。它揭示了法律参与在治疗参与中的关键作用。有法律问题的患者参与治疗的可能性较低。与患有精神障碍的个体相比,患有精神障碍的个体表现出更复杂的行为健康需求,这严重影响了他们的功能,从而为制定有针对性的干预措施提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
245
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health and Addictions (IJMH) is a publication that specializes in presenting the latest research, policies, causes, literature reviews, prevention, and treatment of mental health and addiction-related topics. It focuses on mental health, substance addictions, behavioral addictions, as well as concurrent mental health and addictive disorders. By publishing peer-reviewed articles of high quality, the journal aims to spark an international discussion on issues related to mental health and addiction and to offer valuable insights into how these conditions impact individuals, families, and societies. The journal covers a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, criminology, public health, psychiatry, history, and law. It publishes various types of articles, including feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes, letters to the editor, and commentaries. The journal is published six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信