A new integrated intelligent computing paradigm for predicting joints shear strength

IF 8.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"A new integrated intelligent computing paradigm for predicting joints shear strength","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Joints shear strength is a critical parameter during the design and construction of geotechnical engineering structures. The prevailing models mostly adopt the form of empirical functions, employing mathematical regression techniques to represent experimental data. As an alternative approach, this paper proposes a new integrated intelligent computing paradigm that aims to predict joints shear strength. Five metaheuristic optimization algorithms, including the chameleon swarm algorithm (CSA), slime mold algorithm, transient search optimization algorithm, equilibrium optimizer and social network search algorithm, were employed to enhance the performance of the multilayered perception (MLP) model. Efficiency comparisons were conducted between the proposed CSA-MLP model and twelve classical models, employing statistical indicators such as root mean square error (<em>RMSE</em>), correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (<em>MAE</em>), and variance accounted for (<em>VAF</em>) to evaluate the performance of each model. The sensitivity analysis of parameters that impact joints shear strength was conducted. Finally, the feasibility and limitations of this study were discussed. The results revealed that, in comparison to other models, the CSA-MLP model exhibited the most appropriate performance in terms of <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> (0.88), <em>RMSE</em> (0.19), <em>MAE</em> (0.15), and <em>VAF</em> (90.32%) values. The result of sensitivity analysis showed that the normal stress and the joint roughness coefficient were the most critical factors influencing joints shear strength. This paper presented an efficacious attempt toward swift prediction of joints shear strength, thus avoiding the need for costly in-site and laboratory tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124001087/pdfft?md5=73339df52a8d7bff7cac10fee836eaf1&pid=1-s2.0-S1674987124001087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987124001087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joints shear strength is a critical parameter during the design and construction of geotechnical engineering structures. The prevailing models mostly adopt the form of empirical functions, employing mathematical regression techniques to represent experimental data. As an alternative approach, this paper proposes a new integrated intelligent computing paradigm that aims to predict joints shear strength. Five metaheuristic optimization algorithms, including the chameleon swarm algorithm (CSA), slime mold algorithm, transient search optimization algorithm, equilibrium optimizer and social network search algorithm, were employed to enhance the performance of the multilayered perception (MLP) model. Efficiency comparisons were conducted between the proposed CSA-MLP model and twelve classical models, employing statistical indicators such as root mean square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and variance accounted for (VAF) to evaluate the performance of each model. The sensitivity analysis of parameters that impact joints shear strength was conducted. Finally, the feasibility and limitations of this study were discussed. The results revealed that, in comparison to other models, the CSA-MLP model exhibited the most appropriate performance in terms of R2 (0.88), RMSE (0.19), MAE (0.15), and VAF (90.32%) values. The result of sensitivity analysis showed that the normal stress and the joint roughness coefficient were the most critical factors influencing joints shear strength. This paper presented an efficacious attempt toward swift prediction of joints shear strength, thus avoiding the need for costly in-site and laboratory tests.

Abstract Image

预测接头剪切强度的新型集成智能计算范例
接缝抗剪强度是岩土工程结构设计和施工过程中的一个关键参数。现有模型大多采用经验函数的形式,利用数学回归技术来表示实验数据。作为一种替代方法,本文提出了一种新的集成智能计算范式,旨在预测接缝剪切强度。为了提高多层感知(MLP)模型的性能,本文采用了五种元启发式优化算法,包括变色龙群算法(CSA)、粘液模算法、瞬态搜索优化算法、平衡优化器和社交网络搜索算法。采用均方根误差()、相关系数()、平均绝对误差()和方差占比()等统计指标,对提出的 CSA-MLP 模型和 12 个经典模型进行了效率比较,以评估每个模型的性能。对影响接头剪切强度的参数进行了敏感性分析。最后,讨论了本研究的可行性和局限性。结果表明,与其他模型相比,CSA-MLP 模型的性能最合适,其值分别为(0.88)、(0.19)、(0.15)和(90.32%)。敏感性分析结果表明,法向应力和接头粗糙度系数是影响接头抗剪强度的最关键因素。本文提出了一种快速预测接缝剪切强度的有效尝试,从而避免了昂贵的现场和实验室测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信