Evaluating the Effect of Temperature and Pooling in Detection and Isolation of the Major Non-O157 Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Serogroups from Meat Samples with the Use of Alternative and Standard Methods

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Marion Bouvier, Camille Thollet, Thomas Douellou, Delphine Thevenot Sergentet
{"title":"Evaluating the Effect of Temperature and Pooling in Detection and Isolation of the Major Non-O157 Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Serogroups from Meat Samples with the Use of Alternative and Standard Methods","authors":"Marion Bouvier,&nbsp;Camille Thollet,&nbsp;Thomas Douellou,&nbsp;Delphine Thevenot Sergentet","doi":"10.1007/s12161-024-02653-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pathogenic Shiga toxin–producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) are an important cause of foodborne illness. The detection of STEC in finished products and during the manufacturing process has an important role as part of verification plans, to confirm that practices and procedures described in the food safety program are successfully applied to control STEC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of temperature and pooling in detection and isolation of the major non-O157 STEC serogroups from meat samples with the use of alternative and standard methods. Bovine meat was experimentally inoculated with one of the “Top 6” non-O157 STEC strains (O26, O103, O111, O145, O45, and O121). Both ISO TS 13136:2012 and a novel alternative method were implemented to evaluate the impact of temperature and pooling. An increase of the enrichment temperature to 41.5 °C allowed the detection of the spiked strain in 10% more samples compared to enrichment at 37 °C. The use of 25- and 375-g sample tests demonstrated no statistically differences between both methods. And finally, this alternative method appears easy to use and time-saving for routine laboratory use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"17 10","pages":"1455 - 1465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12161-024-02653-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02653-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pathogenic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are an important cause of foodborne illness. The detection of STEC in finished products and during the manufacturing process has an important role as part of verification plans, to confirm that practices and procedures described in the food safety program are successfully applied to control STEC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of temperature and pooling in detection and isolation of the major non-O157 STEC serogroups from meat samples with the use of alternative and standard methods. Bovine meat was experimentally inoculated with one of the “Top 6” non-O157 STEC strains (O26, O103, O111, O145, O45, and O121). Both ISO TS 13136:2012 and a novel alternative method were implemented to evaluate the impact of temperature and pooling. An increase of the enrichment temperature to 41.5 °C allowed the detection of the spiked strain in 10% more samples compared to enrichment at 37 °C. The use of 25- and 375-g sample tests demonstrated no statistically differences between both methods. And finally, this alternative method appears easy to use and time-saving for routine laboratory use.

Abstract Image

评估使用替代方法和标准方法检测和分离肉类样本中主要非 O157 产志贺毒素大肠埃希氏菌血清群时温度和汇集的影响
致病性产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)是导致食源性疾病的一个重要原因。作为验证计划的一部分,在成品和生产过程中检测 STEC 具有重要作用,可确认食品安全计划中描述的实践和程序已成功应用于 STEC 的控制。本研究的目的是评估使用替代方法和标准方法检测和分离肉类样品中主要非 O157 STEC 血清群时,温度和水池的影响。试验性地将 "六大 "非 O157 STEC 菌株(O26、O103、O111、O145、O45 和 O121)之一接种到牛肉中。我们采用了 ISO TS 13136:2012 和一种新的替代方法来评估温度和汇集的影响。与 37 °C 的富集温度相比,将富集温度提高到 41.5 °C,可在多 10% 的样品中检测到加标菌株。使用 25 克和 375 克样品测试表明,两种方法在统计学上没有差异。最后,这种替代方法似乎易于使用,而且节省时间,适合常规实验室使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信