Quantitative evaluation of nicotine and particulate matter exposure for passive- and non-smokers via a nicotine passive sampler and a particulate matter sensor

Saria Hoshino, Kazushi Noro, Miyu Moriya, Ayana Komatsu, Qi Wang, Yuichi Miyake, Takashi Amagai
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of nicotine and particulate matter exposure for passive- and non-smokers via a nicotine passive sampler and a particulate matter sensor","authors":"Saria Hoshino, Kazushi Noro, Miyu Moriya, Ayana Komatsu, Qi Wang, Yuichi Miyake, Takashi Amagai","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01591-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Passive smoking poses a major hazard to the health of non-smokers. Cigarette combustion emits environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) that contains various pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and particulate matter with particles &lt; 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). Therefore, to assess the risk of passive smoking, it is necessary to determine the exposure levels to ETS compounds caused by passive smoking. However, it is difficult to assess exposure to ETS compounds by excluding the effects of other sources of pollution. In this study, we assessed the individual exposure levels to ETS compounds using a nicotine passive sampler and PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensor in 258 non-smokers. Median nicotine and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were 0.065 and 7.5 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>, respectively. The median nicotine concentration was nearly identical to that found in non-smoking areas (0.05 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>). The median PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were below the standard value for indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations (12 µg m<sup>− 3</sup>). These results indicated that the effect of passive smoking was rather modest. Nicotine concentrations in individuals exposed to passive smoking indoors were significantly higher than in those not exposed to passive smoking. Nicotine exposure from domestic passive smoking was twice that from non-domestic passive smoking. There was no significant difference in PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure between passive smoking in domestic and non-domestic settings. Moreover, it was suggested that passive smoking was equivalent to the act of smoking 2.4 × 10<sup>− 3</sup> cigarettes per day.</p>","PeriodicalId":7458,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01591-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive smoking poses a major hazard to the health of non-smokers. Cigarette combustion emits environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) that contains various pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and particulate matter with particles < 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5). Therefore, to assess the risk of passive smoking, it is necessary to determine the exposure levels to ETS compounds caused by passive smoking. However, it is difficult to assess exposure to ETS compounds by excluding the effects of other sources of pollution. In this study, we assessed the individual exposure levels to ETS compounds using a nicotine passive sampler and PM2.5 sensor in 258 non-smokers. Median nicotine and PM2.5 concentrations were 0.065 and 7.5 µg m− 3, respectively. The median nicotine concentration was nearly identical to that found in non-smoking areas (0.05 µg m− 3). The median PM2.5 concentrations were below the standard value for indoor PM2.5 concentrations (12 µg m− 3). These results indicated that the effect of passive smoking was rather modest. Nicotine concentrations in individuals exposed to passive smoking indoors were significantly higher than in those not exposed to passive smoking. Nicotine exposure from domestic passive smoking was twice that from non-domestic passive smoking. There was no significant difference in PM2.5 exposure between passive smoking in domestic and non-domestic settings. Moreover, it was suggested that passive smoking was equivalent to the act of smoking 2.4 × 10− 3 cigarettes per day.

Abstract Image

通过尼古丁被动采样器和颗粒物传感器对被动吸烟者和非吸烟者的尼古丁和颗粒物暴露进行定量评估
被动吸烟严重危害非吸烟者的健康。香烟燃烧产生的环境烟草烟雾(ETS)含有多种污染物,包括挥发性有机化合物(VOC)、多环芳烃和空气动力学直径为 2.5 μm 的颗粒物(PM2.5)。因此,要评估被动吸烟的风险,就必须确定被动吸烟导致的暴露于 ETS 化合物的水平。然而,排除其他污染源的影响,很难评估暴露于 ETS 化合物的情况。在这项研究中,我们使用尼古丁被动采样器和 PM2.5 传感器评估了 258 名非吸烟者暴露于 ETS 化合物的个人水平。尼古丁和 PM2.5 浓度的中位数分别为 0.065 和 7.5 µg m- 3。尼古丁浓度中值与非吸烟区的尼古丁浓度中值(0.05 µg m-3)几乎相同。PM2.5 浓度的中位数低于室内 PM2.5 浓度的标准值(12 微克/立方米-3)。这些结果表明,被动吸烟的影响相当小。室内被动吸烟者体内的尼古丁浓度明显高于未被动吸烟者。室内被动吸烟者的尼古丁暴露量是非室内被动吸烟者的两倍。在家庭和非家庭环境中被动吸烟的 PM2.5 暴露量没有明显差异。此外,有研究表明,被动吸烟相当于每天吸 2.4 × 10- 3 支香烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信