A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant

IF 0.9 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
U. Das, C. Nandi, D. De, S. Das, S. S. Nandi
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant","authors":"U. Das,&nbsp;C. Nandi,&nbsp;D. De,&nbsp;S. Das,&nbsp;S. S. Nandi","doi":"10.1134/S0040601524700083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coal, a fossil fuel, has been one of the most prominent sources of energy throughout the globe. Alongside its many blessings of being a reliable energy source, it has some curses, including global warming and air, water pollution, and environmental impacts. Born from ancient flora, decaying through epochs past, carbon-laden, fuelling eons in a vast contrast. Anthracite, bituminous, a trove of diverse grades, a worldwide energy titan, but with environmental shades. This study explores into the intricate impacts of coal-fired power plants, navigating the intersection of energy demand, environmental responsibility, and the historical legacy of this carbon-rich resource. In doing so, it employs the “cradle-to-gate” method of life cycle assessments (LCA), a well-researched approach that scrutinizes the entire life cycle of coal-fired power generation. During all three stages, fuel extraction, fuel transportation, and plant operation, basic hotspots of pollution are identified and their adverse effects on the environment are looked into. An analysis of a 530 MW power plant in China has been considered. This report uses both CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden) 2001 (Baseline) and ReCiPe Midpoint (H) analyses to conduct a detailed comparative examination of the environmental implications of the plant’s operation in addition to only the electricity generation. Climate change, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification potential, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, etc are some of the hazards identified during the study. A better scientific approach following standard guidance and efficient management can help to mitigate the pollution caused. The article presents the results of studies of the diverse impact of coal generation on the environment and discusses the most environmentally friendly methods of using this type of fuel to generate electricity.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"71 7","pages":"617 - 630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601524700083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coal, a fossil fuel, has been one of the most prominent sources of energy throughout the globe. Alongside its many blessings of being a reliable energy source, it has some curses, including global warming and air, water pollution, and environmental impacts. Born from ancient flora, decaying through epochs past, carbon-laden, fuelling eons in a vast contrast. Anthracite, bituminous, a trove of diverse grades, a worldwide energy titan, but with environmental shades. This study explores into the intricate impacts of coal-fired power plants, navigating the intersection of energy demand, environmental responsibility, and the historical legacy of this carbon-rich resource. In doing so, it employs the “cradle-to-gate” method of life cycle assessments (LCA), a well-researched approach that scrutinizes the entire life cycle of coal-fired power generation. During all three stages, fuel extraction, fuel transportation, and plant operation, basic hotspots of pollution are identified and their adverse effects on the environment are looked into. An analysis of a 530 MW power plant in China has been considered. This report uses both CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden) 2001 (Baseline) and ReCiPe Midpoint (H) analyses to conduct a detailed comparative examination of the environmental implications of the plant’s operation in addition to only the electricity generation. Climate change, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification potential, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, etc are some of the hazards identified during the study. A better scientific approach following standard guidance and efficient management can help to mitigate the pollution caused. The article presents the results of studies of the diverse impact of coal generation on the environment and discusses the most environmentally friendly methods of using this type of fuel to generate electricity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

燃煤发电厂生命周期评估方法比较研究
摘要 煤炭作为一种化石燃料,一直是全球最主要的能源之一。作为一种可靠的能源,它有许多优点,但也有一些缺点,包括全球变暖、空气和水污染以及对环境的影响。它诞生于古老的植物群,在过去的时代中逐渐腐烂,含碳量高,在巨大的反差中为漫长的岁月提供燃料。无烟煤、沥青、各种等级的煤炭,是世界能源巨头,但也给环境带来了阴影。本研究探讨了燃煤发电厂错综复杂的影响,在能源需求、环境责任和这种富碳资源的历史遗产之间进行了穿梭。在此过程中,本研究采用了 "从摇篮到大门 "的生命周期评估(LCA)方法,这是一种经过深入研究的方法,可仔细检查燃煤发电的整个生命周期。在燃料开采、燃料运输和发电厂运行这三个阶段,都会发现基本的污染热点,并研究其对环境的不利影响。对中国一家 530 兆瓦的发电厂进行了分析。本报告利用 CML(莱顿水文中心)2001 年(基线)和 ReCiPe 中点(H)分析,对发电厂运行过程中对环境的影响进行了详细的比较研究。气候变化、淡水水生生态毒性、酸化潜力、海洋水生生态毒性等是研究中发现的一些危害。按照标准指导和有效管理采取更好的科学方法有助于减轻造成的污染。文章介绍了煤炭发电对环境的各种影响的研究结果,并讨论了使用这类燃料发电的最环保方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信