Selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation based on the number-of-fractionation for persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to pulmonary vein isolation

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Masahiro Mizobuchi, Tomoki Yamashita, Tatsushi Sato, Atsushi Funatsu, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shigeru Nakamura
{"title":"Selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation based on the number-of-fractionation for persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to pulmonary vein isolation","authors":"Masahiro Mizobuchi, Tomoki Yamashita, Tatsushi Sato, Atsushi Funatsu, Tomoko Kobayashi, Shigeru Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01889-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies have suggested that the prolonged or highly fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely related to the reentrant driver regions. We hypothesized that exploration and ablation of these critical complex atrial fractionated electrograms (CFAE) may improve the outcome of persistent AF (PeAF) refractory to conventional PVI.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 73 PeAF patients with residual inducibility or failed cardioversions of AF after PVI were enrolled and underwent number-of-fractionation mapping (NFM) by counting the number of fractionations in 2.5 s at each of the points using the CARTO3 (ICL mode) and EnSite (fractionation map) systems. After NFM, selective CFAE ablation (NFM-CA) targeting the sites of the upper 40% of the counted fraction number (NF40) was performed as an additional procedure for refractory PeAF. We investigated the prognosis of these patients within 24 months after the index ablation procedure and the relationship between changes in activation patterns during the ablation procedure and their prognosis. We also performed a propensity score–matched analysis comparing these patients with historical controls (HC) to identify the optimal indications for NFM-CA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The AF/AT free survival rate was 79.1% at 12 months and 56.7% at 24 months. Patients with AF termination or AF cycle length prolongation &gt; 21 ms during the procedure had significantly better AF/AT-free survival rates than those without notable activation changes (87.7% vs. 69.0%, logrank <i>p</i> = 0.028). After propensity-matched analysis, AF/AT-free survival showed comparable results between the two groups (1 year; NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%, logrank <i>p</i> = 0.649).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>NFM-CA is a versatile and less invasive adjunctive procedure for patients with PVI-refractory PeAF who showed a comparable prognosis to patients with PVI-compliant PeAF. In particular, remarkable activation changes during the procedure (AFCL prolongation &gt; 21 ms or acute termination) suggest a favorable prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01889-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies have suggested that the prolonged or highly fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely related to the reentrant driver regions. We hypothesized that exploration and ablation of these critical complex atrial fractionated electrograms (CFAE) may improve the outcome of persistent AF (PeAF) refractory to conventional PVI.

Methods

A total of 73 PeAF patients with residual inducibility or failed cardioversions of AF after PVI were enrolled and underwent number-of-fractionation mapping (NFM) by counting the number of fractionations in 2.5 s at each of the points using the CARTO3 (ICL mode) and EnSite (fractionation map) systems. After NFM, selective CFAE ablation (NFM-CA) targeting the sites of the upper 40% of the counted fraction number (NF40) was performed as an additional procedure for refractory PeAF. We investigated the prognosis of these patients within 24 months after the index ablation procedure and the relationship between changes in activation patterns during the ablation procedure and their prognosis. We also performed a propensity score–matched analysis comparing these patients with historical controls (HC) to identify the optimal indications for NFM-CA.

Results

The AF/AT free survival rate was 79.1% at 12 months and 56.7% at 24 months. Patients with AF termination or AF cycle length prolongation > 21 ms during the procedure had significantly better AF/AT-free survival rates than those without notable activation changes (87.7% vs. 69.0%, logrank p = 0.028). After propensity-matched analysis, AF/AT-free survival showed comparable results between the two groups (1 year; NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%, logrank p = 0.649).

Conclusions

NFM-CA is a versatile and less invasive adjunctive procedure for patients with PVI-refractory PeAF who showed a comparable prognosis to patients with PVI-compliant PeAF. In particular, remarkable activation changes during the procedure (AFCL prolongation > 21 ms or acute termination) suggest a favorable prognosis.

Abstract Image

基于分馏次数的选择性复杂分馏心房电图消融术治疗肺静脉隔离术难治的持续性心房颤动
导言先前的研究表明,心房颤动(AF)时延长或高度分馏的电图与再电驱动区密切相关。我们假设,对这些关键的复杂心房分馏电图(CFAE)进行探查和消融可能会改善传统 PVI 难以治愈的持续性房颤(PeAF)的预后。方法:共招募了 73 名 PVI 后房颤诱导残留或心律失常的 PeAF 患者,并使用 CARTO3(ICL 模式)和 EnSite(分馏图)系统对每个点在 2.5 秒内的分馏次数进行计数,从而进行分馏次数图绘制(NFM)。在 NFM 之后,针对难治性 PeAF 的附加手术是选择性 CFAE 消融术(NFM-CA),目标是计数馏分数(NF40)的上 40% 的部位。我们调查了这些患者在指数消融术后 24 个月内的预后情况,以及消融术期间激活模式的变化与预后之间的关系。我们还对这些患者与历史对照组(HC)进行了倾向得分匹配分析,以确定 NFM-CA 的最佳适应症。术中出现房颤终止或房颤周期长度延长 21 毫秒的患者的无房颤/无AT存活率明显高于无明显激活变化的患者(87.7% vs. 69.0%,logrank p = 0.028)。经过倾向匹配分析后,两组患者的无房颤/无自发性心动过速存活率相当(1 年;NFM 72.1% vs. HC 77.1%,logrank p = 0.649)。结论NFM-CA 是一种多功能、创伤较小的辅助手术,适用于 PVI 难治性 PeAF 患者,其预后与 PVI 顺应性 PeAF 患者相当。特别是,手术过程中明显的激活变化(AFCL 延长 21 毫秒或急性终止)表明预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信