Effects of plasma-activated water and mild heating on Escherichia coli inactivation during wheat tempering and flour quality

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Jared Rivera, Qingyang Wang, Shivaprasad Doddabematti Prakash, Deepti Salvi, Kaliramesh Siliveru
{"title":"Effects of plasma-activated water and mild heating on Escherichia coli inactivation during wheat tempering and flour quality","authors":"Jared Rivera,&nbsp;Qingyang Wang,&nbsp;Shivaprasad Doddabematti Prakash,&nbsp;Deepti Salvi,&nbsp;Kaliramesh Siliveru","doi":"10.1002/cche.10815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Heat treatment, as a pathogen reduction step, could compromise flour quality. Plasma-activated water (PAW) is a novel pathogen reduction treatment for foods. Combining these treatments could improve pathogen inactivation during wheat tempering and maintain flour quality. This study evaluated the effects of PAW and mild heating on <i>Escherichia coli</i> inactivation during wheat tempering and wheat flour quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p><i>E. coli</i> was inoculated into wheat grains at 6.0 ± 0.1 log CFU/g. A 5-log reduction was achieved after 6 h of tempering with PAW and heating (55°C), whereas 12 h were needed when using heating and deionized water (DI). Tempering with DI (control) and PAW alone only produced a 1-log reduction after 24 h. The PAW and PAW + heat tempering treatments produced flours with comparable yield, physicochemical, dough rheology, and bread characteristics compared to the control treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Mild heating and PAW tempering demonstrated a synergistic effect as it produced greater <i>E. coli</i> reductions at shorter tempering times compared to the individual treatments. The hurdle approach used in this study did not compromise flour quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\n \n <p>The demonstrated hurdle approach can be a viable pathogen mitigation step in wheat milling which could help improve food safety of wheat-based foods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"101 6","pages":"1208-1223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Heat treatment, as a pathogen reduction step, could compromise flour quality. Plasma-activated water (PAW) is a novel pathogen reduction treatment for foods. Combining these treatments could improve pathogen inactivation during wheat tempering and maintain flour quality. This study evaluated the effects of PAW and mild heating on Escherichia coli inactivation during wheat tempering and wheat flour quality.

Findings

E. coli was inoculated into wheat grains at 6.0 ± 0.1 log CFU/g. A 5-log reduction was achieved after 6 h of tempering with PAW and heating (55°C), whereas 12 h were needed when using heating and deionized water (DI). Tempering with DI (control) and PAW alone only produced a 1-log reduction after 24 h. The PAW and PAW + heat tempering treatments produced flours with comparable yield, physicochemical, dough rheology, and bread characteristics compared to the control treatment.

Conclusion

Mild heating and PAW tempering demonstrated a synergistic effect as it produced greater E. coli reductions at shorter tempering times compared to the individual treatments. The hurdle approach used in this study did not compromise flour quality.

Significance and Novelty

The demonstrated hurdle approach can be a viable pathogen mitigation step in wheat milling which could help improve food safety of wheat-based foods.

等离子活化水和温和加热对小麦调质过程中大肠杆菌灭活和面粉质量的影响
背景和目的作为减少病原体的一个步骤,热处理可能会影响面粉的质量。等离子活化水(PAW)是一种新型的食品病原体减毒处理方法。将这些处理方法结合起来,可提高小麦调质过程中的病原体灭活效果,并保持面粉质量。本研究评估了 PAW 和温和加热对小麦调质过程中大肠杆菌灭活和面粉质量的影响。使用 PAW 和加热(55°C)回火 6 小时后,大肠杆菌数量减少了 5 个对数值,而使用加热和去离子水(DI)回火则需要 12 小时。与对照处理相比,PAW 和 PAW + 加热回火处理生产的面粉在产量、理化性质、面团流变性和面包特性方面具有可比性。本研究中使用的障碍法不会影响面粉的质量。意义和新颖性所展示的障碍法是小麦加工中可行的病原体缓解步骤,有助于提高以小麦为原料的食品的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cereal Chemistry
Cereal Chemistry 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
110
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utili­zation of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oil­seeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers. The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信