Conceptualisation of health among young people: a protocol for systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Katrin Metsis, Joanna Inchley, Andrew James Williams, Sebastian Vrahimis, Lamorna Brown, Frank Sullivan
{"title":"Conceptualisation of health among young people: a protocol for systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies","authors":"Katrin Metsis, Joanna Inchley, Andrew James Williams, Sebastian Vrahimis, Lamorna Brown, Frank Sullivan","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02614-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-reported health is a widely used health indicator in surveys and questionnaires. The measure gained attention when research identified its association with mortality in the 1970s and 1980s. The measure is also associated with morbidity and other health outcomes such as the utilisation of health services. Self-reported health is a particularly useful measure for young people because this age group is generally clinically healthy. However, it is known that many chronic conditions have long latency periods that are initiated early in life. Because of its predictive nature, self-reported health can be used to estimate young people’s current and future health. Despite its widespread use, however, self-reported health remains a poorly understood concept. This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that will identify and synthesise qualitative studies that investigate the factors that are considered by young people when they assess their health, and when they talk about health overall. The population of the review is young people aged 10–24 years, with or without health conditions. We will search the databases of MEDLINE (Ovid®), PsycINFO (APA PsycNet), ProQuest Sociology Collection, and Web of Science Core Collection™. We will also utilise techniques of reference checking and forward citation searching, as this strategy has been shown to result in a higher number of high-quality studies in social science systematic reviews. Google Scholar and Google Search were used during preliminary searches; Google Scholar will be utilised for forward citation searching. We will include studies written in English, German, or Finnish; there will be no lower date limit. One reviewer will screen all citations. A second reviewer will independently screen a sample of 20% of the abstracts. Data will be extracted by one researcher, two other researchers will independently review all data extracted, and quality appraisal will be completed by the first reviewer. We will utilise the Quality Framework for the appraisal of included articles and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. The results of this systematic review will improve the understanding of the factors that are considered during the self-assessments of health; this will improve the interpretation of the results of quantitative research. Also, an improved understanding of the conceptualisation of health will inform the development of health policies and interventions that support young people’s health. PROSPERO CRD42022367519.","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02614-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-reported health is a widely used health indicator in surveys and questionnaires. The measure gained attention when research identified its association with mortality in the 1970s and 1980s. The measure is also associated with morbidity and other health outcomes such as the utilisation of health services. Self-reported health is a particularly useful measure for young people because this age group is generally clinically healthy. However, it is known that many chronic conditions have long latency periods that are initiated early in life. Because of its predictive nature, self-reported health can be used to estimate young people’s current and future health. Despite its widespread use, however, self-reported health remains a poorly understood concept. This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that will identify and synthesise qualitative studies that investigate the factors that are considered by young people when they assess their health, and when they talk about health overall. The population of the review is young people aged 10–24 years, with or without health conditions. We will search the databases of MEDLINE (Ovid®), PsycINFO (APA PsycNet), ProQuest Sociology Collection, and Web of Science Core Collection™. We will also utilise techniques of reference checking and forward citation searching, as this strategy has been shown to result in a higher number of high-quality studies in social science systematic reviews. Google Scholar and Google Search were used during preliminary searches; Google Scholar will be utilised for forward citation searching. We will include studies written in English, German, or Finnish; there will be no lower date limit. One reviewer will screen all citations. A second reviewer will independently screen a sample of 20% of the abstracts. Data will be extracted by one researcher, two other researchers will independently review all data extracted, and quality appraisal will be completed by the first reviewer. We will utilise the Quality Framework for the appraisal of included articles and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. The results of this systematic review will improve the understanding of the factors that are considered during the self-assessments of health; this will improve the interpretation of the results of quantitative research. Also, an improved understanding of the conceptualisation of health will inform the development of health policies and interventions that support young people’s health. PROSPERO CRD42022367519.
年轻人的健康概念化:定性研究的系统审查和专题综合规程
自我报告健康状况是调查和问卷中广泛使用的一项健康指标。20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代,当研究发现它与死亡率有关时,这一指标便引起了人们的注意。该指标还与发病率和其他健康结果(如医疗服务的利用率)有关。自我报告健康状况对于年轻人来说是一个特别有用的测量指标,因为这个年龄段的人一般临床上都很健康。然而,众所周知,许多慢性病的潜伏期较长,在生命早期就已开始。由于自我报告健康状况具有预测性,因此可用于估计年轻人当前和未来的健康状况。然而,尽管自我报告的健康状况被广泛使用,但它仍然是一个鲜为人知的概念。本文介绍了一项系统性综述的方案,该方案将确定并综合定性研究,这些定性研究调查了年轻人在评估自己的健康状况以及谈论整体健康状况时所考虑的因素。研究对象为年龄在 10-24 岁之间、有或没有健康问题的年轻人。我们将检索 MEDLINE (Ovid®)、PsycINFO (APA PsycNet)、ProQuest Sociology Collection 和 Web of Science Core Collection™ 等数据库。我们还将利用参考文献检查和前向引文检索技术,因为这种策略已被证明能在社会科学系统综述中获得更多高质量的研究。在初步搜索时,我们使用了谷歌学术和谷歌搜索;在前向引用搜索时,我们将使用谷歌学术。我们将收录用英语、德语或芬兰语撰写的研究报告;不设日期下限。一位审稿人将对所有引文进行筛选。第二位审稿人将独立筛选 20% 的摘要样本。数据将由一名研究人员提取,另外两名研究人员将独立审查所有提取的数据,质量评估将由第一名审稿人完成。我们将利用质量框架对纳入的文章进行评估,并对定性研究进行专题综合。本次系统性综述的结果将加深人们对健康自我评估过程中考虑的因素的理解;这将改善对定量研究结果的解释。此外,对健康概念的进一步理解也将为制定支持青少年健康的卫生政策和干预措施提供参考。PERCOMO CRD42022367519.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信