The point of no return: Crisis management lessons from US adults' infectious disease risk (IDR) perception and response to the Flu-and-COVID dual threat

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Youngji Seo, Sung In Choi, Youngjee Ko, Yan Jin
{"title":"The point of no return: Crisis management lessons from US adults' infectious disease risk (IDR) perception and response to the Flu-and-COVID dual threat","authors":"Youngji Seo,&nbsp;Sung In Choi,&nbsp;Youngjee Ko,&nbsp;Yan Jin","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.12607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crisis learning is essential for improving crisis management. Looking back at how public health crises were managed, crisis scholars and practitioners can garner important future crisis readiness insight in managing critical risks and crises threatening public health and safety. Among existing crisis research examining infectious disease risks (IDRs) and IDR-triggered health crises, few studies have examined how <i>co-existing</i> particular infectious diseases influence individuals' risk perception and crisis responses. To address this gap, the current study provides lessons learned from an online survey, using a nationally representative US adult sample (<i>N</i> = 517), conducted during the early stages of the Coronavirus [COVID-19] outbreak, before the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 global pandemic. The unique timing of the online survey allows us to examine: (1) how US adults perceived individual health risks associated with COVID-19 and influenza [the flu], two infectious diseases concurrently discussed and compared by the news media and health experts; and (2) how perceived IDR influences their subsequent behavioral response. Key findings include, first, that the less novel IDR (i.e., the flu) led to higher perceived susceptibility, while the more novel IDR (i.e., COVID-19), at the point of data collection, led to higher perceived severity. Second, IDR susceptibility and severity predicted intention to preventive action when confronted by the flu or COVID-19. Third, individuals' trust in the government moderated risk response by IDR type. These findings have theoretical and practical implications for effective IDR communication in the process of ongoing public crisis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.12607","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crisis learning is essential for improving crisis management. Looking back at how public health crises were managed, crisis scholars and practitioners can garner important future crisis readiness insight in managing critical risks and crises threatening public health and safety. Among existing crisis research examining infectious disease risks (IDRs) and IDR-triggered health crises, few studies have examined how co-existing particular infectious diseases influence individuals' risk perception and crisis responses. To address this gap, the current study provides lessons learned from an online survey, using a nationally representative US adult sample (N = 517), conducted during the early stages of the Coronavirus [COVID-19] outbreak, before the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 global pandemic. The unique timing of the online survey allows us to examine: (1) how US adults perceived individual health risks associated with COVID-19 and influenza [the flu], two infectious diseases concurrently discussed and compared by the news media and health experts; and (2) how perceived IDR influences their subsequent behavioral response. Key findings include, first, that the less novel IDR (i.e., the flu) led to higher perceived susceptibility, while the more novel IDR (i.e., COVID-19), at the point of data collection, led to higher perceived severity. Second, IDR susceptibility and severity predicted intention to preventive action when confronted by the flu or COVID-19. Third, individuals' trust in the government moderated risk response by IDR type. These findings have theoretical and practical implications for effective IDR communication in the process of ongoing public crisis management.

Abstract Image

不归点:从美国成年人对传染病风险 (IDR) 的认知和对流感和艾滋病双重威胁的反应中汲取危机管理经验
危机学习对于改进危机管理至关重要。回顾公共卫生危机的管理方式,危机学者和从业人员可以在管理威胁公共卫生和安全的重大风险和危机时,获得重要的未来危机准备洞察力。在现有的有关传染病风险(IDRs)和 IDR 引发的健康危机的危机研究中,很少有研究探讨同时存在的特定传染病如何影响个人的风险认知和危机应对。为了弥补这一不足,本研究在世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布 COVID-19 全球大流行之前,在冠状病毒 [COVID-19] 爆发的早期阶段,使用具有全国代表性的美国成人样本(N = 517)进行了在线调查,从中汲取了经验教训。在线调查的独特时机使我们能够研究:(1) 美国成年人如何感知与 COVID-19 和流感(新闻媒体和健康专家同时讨论和比较的两种传染病)相关的个人健康风险;(2) 感知到的 IDR 如何影响他们随后的行为反应。主要研究结果包括:第一,在数据收集时,较不新颖的 IDR(即流感)导致较高的感知易感性,而较新颖的 IDR(即 COVID-19)导致较高的感知严重性。其次,在面对流感或 COVID-19 时,IDR 的易感性和严重性预示着采取预防措施的意愿。第三,个人对政府的信任度调节了 IDR 类型的风险反应。这些发现对于在持续的公共危机管理过程中进行有效的 IDR 传播具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信