How Daily Job Insecurity Links to Next-Day Ingratiation: The Roles of Emotional Exhaustion and Power Distance Orientation

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Bo Yang, Chaoyue Zhao, Yao Zhu, Xianchun Li
{"title":"How Daily Job Insecurity Links to Next-Day Ingratiation: The Roles of Emotional Exhaustion and Power Distance Orientation","authors":"Bo Yang, Chaoyue Zhao, Yao Zhu, Xianchun Li","doi":"10.2147/prbm.s438242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Numerous empirical studies consistently support the detrimental impact of job insecurity (JI) on employees. However, a new perspective suggests that individuals perceiving JI may proactively take measures to protect their positions. Drawing from the conservation of resources theory, this study argues that perceived resource loss due to JI motivates employees to engage in ingratiating behaviors for expanding their social capital. Additionally, this study empirically establishes the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating effect of power distance.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A daily diary design was used to examine the relationship between daily JI and next-day ingratiation. Our analyses of data collected from 134 full‐time employees across 10 consecutive working days using multi-level model.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Our results showed that daily JI was found to affect next-day ingratiation (γ = 0.14, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), and this relationship was mediated by emotional exhaustion (indirect effect = 0.07, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05, 95% CI [0.01, 0.13]). Power distance moderated the relationship between emotional exhaustion and ingratiation (γ = 0.25, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and further moderated the indirect effect of JI on ingratiation via emotional exhaustion.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our study has revealed that JI serves as a catalyst for employees to engage in resource creation behavior, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the implications of JI as an independent variable for both scholars and businesses.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> job insecurity, emotional exhaustion, power distance, ingratiation<br/>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s438242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Numerous empirical studies consistently support the detrimental impact of job insecurity (JI) on employees. However, a new perspective suggests that individuals perceiving JI may proactively take measures to protect their positions. Drawing from the conservation of resources theory, this study argues that perceived resource loss due to JI motivates employees to engage in ingratiating behaviors for expanding their social capital. Additionally, this study empirically establishes the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating effect of power distance.
Methods: A daily diary design was used to examine the relationship between daily JI and next-day ingratiation. Our analyses of data collected from 134 full‐time employees across 10 consecutive working days using multi-level model.
Results: Our results showed that daily JI was found to affect next-day ingratiation (γ = 0.14, p < 0.01), and this relationship was mediated by emotional exhaustion (indirect effect = 0.07, p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.01, 0.13]). Power distance moderated the relationship between emotional exhaustion and ingratiation (γ = 0.25, p < 0.001), and further moderated the indirect effect of JI on ingratiation via emotional exhaustion.
Conclusion: Our study has revealed that JI serves as a catalyst for employees to engage in resource creation behavior, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the implications of JI as an independent variable for both scholars and businesses.

Keywords: job insecurity, emotional exhaustion, power distance, ingratiation
日常工作的不安全感如何与次日的亲和力相关联:情绪耗竭和权力距离取向的作用
目的:大量实证研究一致支持工作不稳定(JI)对员工的不利影响。然而,一种新的观点认为,感知到工作不稳定的个人可能会主动采取措施保护自己的职位。本研究从资源保护理论出发,认为因工作不稳定而导致的感知到的资源损失会促使员工参与讨好行为,以扩大其社会资本。此外,本研究还通过实证研究确定了情绪耗竭的中介作用和权力距离的调节作用:方法:采用每日日记的设计来研究每日联合行动与次日亲近行为之间的关系。我们使用多层次模型对 134 名全职员工连续 10 个工作日的数据进行了分析:结果表明,每日联合工作会影响第二天的亲和力(γ = 0.14,p <0.01),这种关系受到情绪衰竭的调节(间接效应 = 0.07,p <0.05,95% CI [0.01,0.13])。权力距离调节了情感衰竭与亲和力之间的关系(γ = 0.25,p <0.001),并通过情感衰竭进一步调节了联合执行对亲和力的间接影响:我们的研究揭示了联合工作是员工参与资源创造行为的催化剂,从而有助于学者和企业更深入地理解联合工作作为一个自变量的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信