Small-Signal Stability Criteria in Power Electronics-Dominated Power Systems: A Comparative Review

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Qifan Chen;Siqi Bu;Chi Yung Chung
{"title":"Small-Signal Stability Criteria in Power Electronics-Dominated Power Systems: A Comparative Review","authors":"Qifan Chen;Siqi Bu;Chi Yung Chung","doi":"10.35833/MPCE.2023.000526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To tackle emerging power system small-signal stability problems such as wideband oscillations induced by the large-scale integration of renewable energy and power electronics, it is crucial to review and compare existing small-signal stability analysis methods. On this basis, guidance can be provided on determining suitable analysis methods to solve relevant small-signal stability problems in power electronics-dominated power systems (PEDPSs). Various mature methods have been developed to analyze the small-signal stability of PEDPSs, including eigenvalue-based methods, Routh stability criterion, Nyquist/Bode plot based methods, passivity-based methods, positive-net-damping method, lumped impedance-based methods, bifurcation-based methods, etc. In this paper, the application conditions, advantages, and limitations of these criteria in identifying oscillation frequencies and stability margins are reviewed and compared to reveal and explain connections and discrepancies among them. Especially, efforts are devoted to mathematically proving the equivalence between these small-signal stability criteria. Finally, the performance of these criteria is demonstrated and compared in a 4-machine 2-area power system with a wind farm and an IEEE 39-bus power system with 3 wind farms.","PeriodicalId":51326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10355078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10355078/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To tackle emerging power system small-signal stability problems such as wideband oscillations induced by the large-scale integration of renewable energy and power electronics, it is crucial to review and compare existing small-signal stability analysis methods. On this basis, guidance can be provided on determining suitable analysis methods to solve relevant small-signal stability problems in power electronics-dominated power systems (PEDPSs). Various mature methods have been developed to analyze the small-signal stability of PEDPSs, including eigenvalue-based methods, Routh stability criterion, Nyquist/Bode plot based methods, passivity-based methods, positive-net-damping method, lumped impedance-based methods, bifurcation-based methods, etc. In this paper, the application conditions, advantages, and limitations of these criteria in identifying oscillation frequencies and stability margins are reviewed and compared to reveal and explain connections and discrepancies among them. Especially, efforts are devoted to mathematically proving the equivalence between these small-signal stability criteria. Finally, the performance of these criteria is demonstrated and compared in a 4-machine 2-area power system with a wind farm and an IEEE 39-bus power system with 3 wind farms.
电力电子主导型电力系统中的小信号稳定性标准:比较综述
为了解决新出现的电力系统小信号稳定性问题,如可再生能源和电力电子大规模集成所引起的宽带振荡,对现有的小信号稳定性分析方法进行回顾和比较至关重要。在此基础上,可以指导确定合适的分析方法,以解决以电力电子为主导的电力系统(PEDPS)中的相关小信号稳定性问题。目前已开发出多种成熟的 PEDPS 小信号稳定性分析方法,包括基于特征值的方法、Routh 稳定性准则、基于 Nyquist/Bode plot 的方法、基于被动性的方法、正网阻尼法、基于叠加阻抗的方法、基于分岔的方法等。本文对这些标准在确定振荡频率和稳定裕度方面的应用条件、优势和局限性进行了回顾和比较,以揭示和解释它们之间的联系和差异。特别是,本文致力于从数学上证明这些小信号稳定性标准之间的等效性。最后,在一个有风电场的 4 机 2 区电力系统和一个有 3 个风电场的 IEEE 39 总线电力系统中演示并比较了这些标准的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy (MPCE), commencing from June, 2013, is a newly established, peer-reviewed and quarterly published journal in English. It is the first international power engineering journal originated in mainland China. MPCE publishes original papers, short letters and review articles in the field of modern power systems with focus on smart grid technology and renewable energy integration, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信