Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Alexandra G. Rosati , Elisa Felsche , Megan F. Cole , Rebeca Atencia , Joshua Rukundo
{"title":"Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees","authors":"Alexandra G. Rosati ,&nbsp;Elisa Felsche ,&nbsp;Megan F. Cole ,&nbsp;Rebeca Atencia ,&nbsp;Joshua Rukundo","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humans can flexibly use metacognition to monitor their own knowledge and strategically acquire new information when needed. While humans can deploy these skills across a variety of contexts, most evidence for metacognition in animals has focused on simple situations, such as seeking out information about the location of food. Here, we examine the flexibility, breadth, and limits of this skill in chimpanzees. We tested semi-free-ranging chimpanzees on a novel task where they could seek information by standing up to peer into different containers. In Study 1, we tested <em>n</em> = 47 chimpanzees to assess if chimpanzees would spontaneously engage in information-seeking without prior experience, as well as to characterize individual variation in this propensity. We found that many chimpanzees engaged in information-seeking with minimal experience, and that younger chimpanzees and females were more likely to do so. In two subsequent studies, we then further tested chimpanzees who initially showed robust information-seeking on new variations of this task, to disentangle the cognitive processing shaping their behaviors. In Study 2, we examined how a subset of <em>n</em> = 12 chimpanzees applied these skills to seek information about the location versus the identity of rewards, and found that chimpanzees were equally adept at seeking out location and identity information. In Study 3, we examined whether a subset of <em>n</em> = 6 chimpanzees could apply these skills to make more efficacious decisions when faced with uncertainty about reward payoffs. Chimpanzees were able to use information-seeking to resolve risk and choose more optimally when faced with uncertain payoffs, although they often also engaged in information-seeking when it was not strictly necessary. These results identify core features of flexible metacognition that chimpanzees share with humans, as well as constraints that may represent key evolutionary shifts in human cognition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001847","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans can flexibly use metacognition to monitor their own knowledge and strategically acquire new information when needed. While humans can deploy these skills across a variety of contexts, most evidence for metacognition in animals has focused on simple situations, such as seeking out information about the location of food. Here, we examine the flexibility, breadth, and limits of this skill in chimpanzees. We tested semi-free-ranging chimpanzees on a novel task where they could seek information by standing up to peer into different containers. In Study 1, we tested n = 47 chimpanzees to assess if chimpanzees would spontaneously engage in information-seeking without prior experience, as well as to characterize individual variation in this propensity. We found that many chimpanzees engaged in information-seeking with minimal experience, and that younger chimpanzees and females were more likely to do so. In two subsequent studies, we then further tested chimpanzees who initially showed robust information-seeking on new variations of this task, to disentangle the cognitive processing shaping their behaviors. In Study 2, we examined how a subset of n = 12 chimpanzees applied these skills to seek information about the location versus the identity of rewards, and found that chimpanzees were equally adept at seeking out location and identity information. In Study 3, we examined whether a subset of n = 6 chimpanzees could apply these skills to make more efficacious decisions when faced with uncertainty about reward payoffs. Chimpanzees were able to use information-seeking to resolve risk and choose more optimally when faced with uncertain payoffs, although they often also engaged in information-seeking when it was not strictly necessary. These results identify core features of flexible metacognition that chimpanzees share with humans, as well as constraints that may represent key evolutionary shifts in human cognition.

黑猩猩的灵活信息搜寻。
人类可以灵活运用元认知来监控自己的知识,并在需要时有策略地获取新信息。虽然人类可以在各种情况下运用这些技能,但动物元认知的大多数证据都集中在简单的情况下,例如寻找有关食物位置的信息。在这里,我们研究了黑猩猩这种技能的灵活性、广度和局限性。我们对半自由活动的黑猩猩进行了一项新任务的测试,让它们通过站立窥视不同的容器来寻找信息。在研究 1 中,我们对 n = 47 只黑猩猩进行了测试,以评估黑猩猩是否会在没有先前经验的情况下自发地进行信息搜寻,以及这种倾向的个体差异。我们发现,许多黑猩猩都会在没有经验的情况下进行信息搜寻,而且年龄较小的黑猩猩和雌性黑猩猩更有可能这样做。在随后的两项研究中,我们进一步对最初表现出强烈信息搜寻倾向的黑猩猩进行了新任务测试,以揭示影响其行为的认知过程。在研究 2 中,我们考察了 n = 12 只黑猩猩如何运用这些技能来寻找有关奖励的位置和身份的信息,结果发现黑猩猩同样擅长寻找位置和身份信息。在研究 3 中,我们考察了由 n = 6 只黑猩猩组成的子集能否在面临奖励报酬不确定的情况下运用这些技能做出更有效的决策。黑猩猩能够利用信息搜寻来化解风险,并在面对不确定的回报时做出更优化的选择,尽管它们也经常在并非绝对必要的情况下进行信息搜寻。这些结果确定了黑猩猩与人类共享的灵活元认知的核心特征,以及可能代表人类认知进化关键转变的限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信