Constructing, Deconstructing or Abolishing? Discourses on Masculinities in Violence Against Women Prevention by Stakeholders in Spain.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Krizia Nardini, Ariadna Cerdán-Torregrosa, Belén Sanz-Barbero, MCarmen Davó-Blanes, Carmen Vives-Cases
{"title":"Constructing, Deconstructing or Abolishing? Discourses on Masculinities in Violence Against Women Prevention by Stakeholders in Spain.","authors":"Krizia Nardini, Ariadna Cerdán-Torregrosa, Belén Sanz-Barbero, MCarmen Davó-Blanes, Carmen Vives-Cases","doi":"10.1177/08862605241265437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the field of violence against women (VAW) prevention, one of the current questions at stake is how to address men's role and masculinities, but it is still an emerging field in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the up-to-date discourses on masculinity among stakeholders in the field of VAW prevention and gender equity in Spain. We used a qualitative methodology with semi-structured interviews, conducted between October 2019 and February 2020 in Madrid and Alicante (Spain), with 23 key stakeholders from different areas: in governmental (public health and VAW prevention/intervention, and institutional and policy positioning) and nongovernmental organizations (anti-violence masculinities workers, youth education workers, and feminist and LGBT associations). A discourse analysis was performed with the data collected. Our findings showed that discourses around masculinities among Spanish stakeholders in VAW prevention and gender equity were diverse and presented different layers of critique. Despite a general agreement on the importance of transforming sexist men's practices toward more gender equitable relations, three main interpretive repertoires were identified: \"Constructing positive/new masculinities\" discourse, focused on promoting men's engagement and egalitarian practices; \"Deconstructing hegemonic masculinity\" discourse, intended to critically identify and question harmful masculinities norms; and \"Abolishing gender\" discourse, which aims at dismantling masculinity, and gender in general, as a social structure that generates oppression in itself, advocating for its abolition. Those interpretive repertoires were not mutually exclusive and sometimes stakeholders incorporate in their work more than one approach. The study findings shed light on this current emerging and urgent debate and contributes more broadly to the critical assessment of the concepts used and their implications for VAW prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241265437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of violence against women (VAW) prevention, one of the current questions at stake is how to address men's role and masculinities, but it is still an emerging field in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the up-to-date discourses on masculinity among stakeholders in the field of VAW prevention and gender equity in Spain. We used a qualitative methodology with semi-structured interviews, conducted between October 2019 and February 2020 in Madrid and Alicante (Spain), with 23 key stakeholders from different areas: in governmental (public health and VAW prevention/intervention, and institutional and policy positioning) and nongovernmental organizations (anti-violence masculinities workers, youth education workers, and feminist and LGBT associations). A discourse analysis was performed with the data collected. Our findings showed that discourses around masculinities among Spanish stakeholders in VAW prevention and gender equity were diverse and presented different layers of critique. Despite a general agreement on the importance of transforming sexist men's practices toward more gender equitable relations, three main interpretive repertoires were identified: "Constructing positive/new masculinities" discourse, focused on promoting men's engagement and egalitarian practices; "Deconstructing hegemonic masculinity" discourse, intended to critically identify and question harmful masculinities norms; and "Abolishing gender" discourse, which aims at dismantling masculinity, and gender in general, as a social structure that generates oppression in itself, advocating for its abolition. Those interpretive repertoires were not mutually exclusive and sometimes stakeholders incorporate in their work more than one approach. The study findings shed light on this current emerging and urgent debate and contributes more broadly to the critical assessment of the concepts used and their implications for VAW prevention.

建构、解构还是废除?西班牙利益相关者在预防暴力侵害妇女行为中关于男性的论述》。
在预防暴力侵害妇女(VAW)领域,当前的一个关键问题是如何解决男性角色和男性气质问题,但这在西班牙仍是一个新兴领域。本研究旨在分析西班牙预防暴力侵害妇女和性别平等领域利益相关者对男性气质的最新论述。我们采用了定性方法,于 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月期间在马德里和阿利坎特(西班牙)进行了半结构式访谈,访谈对象包括来自不同领域的 23 位主要利益相关者:政府组织(公共卫生和暴力侵害预防/干预,以及机构和政策定位)和非政府组织(反暴力男性工作者、青年教育工作者、女权主义者和女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者协会)。我们对收集到的数据进行了话语分析。我们的研究结果表明,西班牙在预防暴力侵害妇女和性别平等方面的利益相关者围绕男子气概的论述多种多样,并提出了不同层次的批评。尽管大家普遍认为必须转变男性的性别歧视做法,以建立更加公平的性别关系,但我们还是发现了三种主要的解释性语汇:"建构积极的/新的男子气概 "论述,侧重于促进男性的参与和平等做法;"解构霸权的男子气概 "论述,旨在批判性地识别和质疑有害的男子气概规范;以及 "废除性别 "论述,旨在解构男子气概和一般性别,将其视为一种本身就产生压迫的社会结构,倡导废除这种结构。这些解释方法并不是相互排斥的,有时利益相关者在工作中会采用一种以上的方法。研究结果揭示了这一当前新出现的紧迫辩论,并为批判性评估所使用的概念及其对预防暴力侵害妇女行为的影响做出了更广泛的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信