Aleksandra Mesaroš, Iva Atanasković, Marija Nedeljković, Slaviša Stanković, Jelena Lozo
{"title":"Differential responses of bell pepper genotypes to indigenous Pseudomonas putida A32 treatment: implications for drought resilience.","authors":"Aleksandra Mesaroš, Iva Atanasković, Marija Nedeljković, Slaviša Stanković, Jelena Lozo","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB), Pseudomonas putida A32, to mitigate drought stress in two bell pepper genotypes, Amfora 19 and Amfora 26, and to assess the genotype-specific responses to bacterial treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The isolate P. putida A32 was selected for its remarkable beneficial properties, exhibiting 13 out of 14 traits tested. Under drought conditions, Amfora 26 showed increased relative water content and decreased H2O2 and malondialdehyde following bacterial treatment, while Amfora 19 exhibited enhanced growth parameters but responded less to bacterial treatment regarding drought parameters. However, Amfora 19 displayed inherent drought tolerance mechanisms, as indicated by lower stress parameters compared to Amfora 26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study emphasizes the importance of genotype-specific responses to PGPB treatment and the mechanisms of drought tolerance in peppers. Pseudomonas putida A32 effectively mitigated drought stress in both genotypes, with differential responses influenced by plant genotype. Our study confirmed our initial hypothesis that Amfora 19, as a genotype tolerant to biotic stress, is also more tolerant to abiotic stress. Understanding these interactions is crucial for the development of customized strategies to improve plant productivity and tolerance to drought.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB), Pseudomonas putida A32, to mitigate drought stress in two bell pepper genotypes, Amfora 19 and Amfora 26, and to assess the genotype-specific responses to bacterial treatment.
Methods and results: The isolate P. putida A32 was selected for its remarkable beneficial properties, exhibiting 13 out of 14 traits tested. Under drought conditions, Amfora 26 showed increased relative water content and decreased H2O2 and malondialdehyde following bacterial treatment, while Amfora 19 exhibited enhanced growth parameters but responded less to bacterial treatment regarding drought parameters. However, Amfora 19 displayed inherent drought tolerance mechanisms, as indicated by lower stress parameters compared to Amfora 26.
Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of genotype-specific responses to PGPB treatment and the mechanisms of drought tolerance in peppers. Pseudomonas putida A32 effectively mitigated drought stress in both genotypes, with differential responses influenced by plant genotype. Our study confirmed our initial hypothesis that Amfora 19, as a genotype tolerant to biotic stress, is also more tolerant to abiotic stress. Understanding these interactions is crucial for the development of customized strategies to improve plant productivity and tolerance to drought.
期刊介绍:
Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.