Different psychopathological courses between chronic interictal psychosis and schizophrenia

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Different psychopathological courses between chronic interictal psychosis and schizophrenia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The clinical course of interictal psychosis (IIP) has not yet been investigated. We aimed to compared the psychopathology and time-relevant indices between chronic IIP (CIIP) and schizophrenia (SC)</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this comprehensive psychopathological study, patients with chronic psychosis with and without epilepsy (127 with CIIP and 187 with SC) were compared. Psychopathology was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): total, negative symptoms (NSs), positive symptoms (PSs), and anxiety-depressive symptoms (ADSs). Time-relevant indices included age at the time of evaluation, age at the onset of psychosis, and duration of psychosis. The psychopathology of psychosis types and time-relevant indices were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis of covariance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p> Age at the time of evaluation was significantly correlated with NS, and ADS scores. Age-relevant trajectories significantly interacted with psychosis types. As age advanced, patients with SC exhibited increased scores, whereas patients with CIIP often exhibited decreased (or unchanged) scores. Age at onset of psychosis was significantly correlated with NS and ADS outcomes in patients with CIIP, whereas it was not correlated in patients with SC. There were significant interactions between age at onset and psychosis types. Patients with early-onset CIIP exhibited higher NS and lower ADS scores, whereas patients with SC exhibited no particular trajectory. The duration of psychosis significantly interacted with the psychosis types in the BPRS total, NSs and PSs. As duration increased, patients with CIIP exhibited no significant relationship, whereas patients with SC exhibited significantly higher psychotic scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Psychopathological courses differ between patients with CIIP and SC. Although patients with SC often exhibit deteriorations in psychotic symptoms, patients with CIIP exhibit no distinct deterioration. These findings can contribute psychiatric nosology, treatment strategies, and prediction outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024003378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The clinical course of interictal psychosis (IIP) has not yet been investigated. We aimed to compared the psychopathology and time-relevant indices between chronic IIP (CIIP) and schizophrenia (SC)

Methods

In this comprehensive psychopathological study, patients with chronic psychosis with and without epilepsy (127 with CIIP and 187 with SC) were compared. Psychopathology was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): total, negative symptoms (NSs), positive symptoms (PSs), and anxiety-depressive symptoms (ADSs). Time-relevant indices included age at the time of evaluation, age at the onset of psychosis, and duration of psychosis. The psychopathology of psychosis types and time-relevant indices were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis of covariance.

Results

 Age at the time of evaluation was significantly correlated with NS, and ADS scores. Age-relevant trajectories significantly interacted with psychosis types. As age advanced, patients with SC exhibited increased scores, whereas patients with CIIP often exhibited decreased (or unchanged) scores. Age at onset of psychosis was significantly correlated with NS and ADS outcomes in patients with CIIP, whereas it was not correlated in patients with SC. There were significant interactions between age at onset and psychosis types. Patients with early-onset CIIP exhibited higher NS and lower ADS scores, whereas patients with SC exhibited no particular trajectory. The duration of psychosis significantly interacted with the psychosis types in the BPRS total, NSs and PSs. As duration increased, patients with CIIP exhibited no significant relationship, whereas patients with SC exhibited significantly higher psychotic scores.

Conclusion

Psychopathological courses differ between patients with CIIP and SC. Although patients with SC often exhibit deteriorations in psychotic symptoms, patients with CIIP exhibit no distinct deterioration. These findings can contribute psychiatric nosology, treatment strategies, and prediction outcomes.

慢性发作间歇性精神病与精神分裂症的精神病理过程不同。
目的:发作间期精神病(IIP)的临床过程尚未得到研究。我们的目的是比较慢性间歇性精神病(CIIP)和精神分裂症(SC)的精神病理学和时间相关指数 方法:在这项综合精神病理学研究中,我们比较了伴有和不伴有癫痫的慢性精神病患者(127 名 CIIP 患者和 187 名 SC 患者)。精神病理学采用简易精神病评定量表(BPRS)进行测量:总分、阴性症状(NSs)、阳性症状(PSs)和焦虑抑郁症状(ADSs)。与时间相关的指数包括评估时的年龄、精神病发病时的年龄和精神病持续时间。采用皮尔逊相关系数协方差分析法对精神病类型的精神病理学和时间相关指数进行分析:结果:评估时的年龄与 NS 和 ADS 评分有显著相关性。年龄相关轨迹与精神病类型有明显的交互作用。随着年龄的增长,SC 患者的得分会增加,而 CIIP 患者的得分往往会降低(或不变)。在CIIP患者中,精神病发病年龄与NS和ADS结果有显著相关性,而在SC患者中则没有相关性。发病年龄与精神病类型之间存在明显的交互作用。早期发病的 CIIP 患者表现出较高的 NS 和较低的 ADS 分数,而 SC 患者则没有表现出特别的轨迹。在 BPRS 总分、NSs 和 PSs 中,精神病持续时间与精神病类型之间存在明显的交互作用。随着持续时间的延长,CIIP 患者没有表现出明显的关系,而 SC 患者的精神病评分明显更高:结论:CIIP 和 SC 患者的精神病理过程不同。结论:CIIP 和 SC 患者的精神病理过程不同,虽然 SC 患者的精神症状经常恶化,但 CIIP 患者的精神症状没有明显恶化。这些发现有助于精神病学的命名、治疗策略和预测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信