Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yuxiao Liu, Xiaofan Guo, Peijun Xu, Yuning Song, Jing Huang, Xingyun Chen, Wenbo Zhu, Jihui Hao, Song Gao
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study.","authors":"Yuxiao Liu, Xiaofan Guo, Peijun Xu, Yuning Song, Jing Huang, Xingyun Chen, Wenbo Zhu, Jihui Hao, Song Gao","doi":"10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy, including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and NALIRIFOX, for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC). In addition, the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, respectively. Demographic and clinical features, except age and liver metastasis, were comparable between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy, respectively (HR = 1.244, 95% CI = 1.090-1.419; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care, respectively (HR = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.677-0.867; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9611,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Little progress has been made in recent years using first-line chemotherapy, including gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX, and NALIRIFOX, for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC). In addition, the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of second-line chemotherapy for APC.

Methods: Patients with APC who received first-line treatment from January 2008 to January 2021 were considered eligible for this retrospective analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively.

Results: Four hundred and thirty-seven and 617 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment, respectively. Demographic and clinical features, except age and liver metastasis, were comparable between the two groups (P < 0.05). The median OS was 8.8 and 7.8 months in patients who received a 5-fluorouracil- and gemcitabine-based combined regimen for first-line therapy, respectively (HR = 1.244, 95% CI = 1.090-1.419; P < 0.001). The median OS was 5.6 and 1.9 months in patients who received second-line chemotherapy and supportive care, respectively (HR = 0.766, 95% CI = 0.677-0.867; P < 0.001). The median PFS was not significantly differently between gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil monotherapy and combination therapy.

Conclusions: A 5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based combined regimen was shown to be as effective as a single 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine regimen as second-line therapy for patients with APC.

晚期胰腺癌患者二线化疗的临床疗效:一项真实世界研究。
目的:近年来,采用吉西他滨联合纳布-紫杉醇、FOLFIRINOX 和 NALIRIFOX 等一线化疗治疗晚期胰腺腺癌(APC)的进展甚微。此外,最佳二线化疗方案尚未确定。本研究旨在比较不同类型二线化疗对 APC 的疗效:方法:2008年1月至2021年1月期间接受一线治疗的APC患者被视为符合本次回顾性分析的条件。主要和次要终点分别为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS):分别有437名和617名患者接受了以5-氟尿嘧啶和吉西他滨为基础的一线化疗。除年龄和肝转移外,两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征相当(P < 0.05)。接受5-氟尿嘧啶和吉西他滨联合方案一线治疗的患者的中位OS分别为8.8个月和7.8个月(HR = 1.244,95% CI = 1.090-1.419;P < 0.001)。接受二线化疗和支持治疗的患者的中位OS分别为5.6个月和1.9个月(HR = 0.766,95% CI = 0.677-0.867;P < 0.001)。吉西他滨或5-氟尿嘧啶单药治疗与联合治疗的中位PFS无明显差异:结论:以5-氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨为基础的联合疗法作为APC患者的二线疗法与单一的5-氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨疗法一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Cancer Biology & Medicine Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Biology & Medicine (ISSN 2095-3941) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of Chinese Anti-cancer Association (CACA), which is the leading professional society of oncology in China. The journal quarterly provides innovative and significant information on biological basis of cancer, cancer microenvironment, translational cancer research, and all aspects of clinical cancer research. The journal also publishes significant perspectives on indigenous cancer types in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信