Developing and Evaluating a Situated Assessment Instrument for Trichotillomania: The SAM2 TAI.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Courtney Taylor Browne Lūka, Katie Hendry, Léo Dutriaux, Judith L Stevenson, Lawrence W Barsalou
{"title":"Developing and Evaluating a Situated Assessment Instrument for Trichotillomania: The SAM<sup>2</sup> TAI.","authors":"Courtney Taylor Browne Lūka, Katie Hendry, Léo Dutriaux, Judith L Stevenson, Lawrence W Barsalou","doi":"10.1177/10731911241262140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring trichotillomania is essential for understanding and treating it effectively. Using the Situated Assessment Method (SAM<sup>2</sup>), we developed a psychometric instrument to assess hair pulling in situations where it occurs. In two studies, pullers evaluated their pulling in relevant situations, along with how much they experience factors that potentially influence it (e.g., external triggers, reduction in negative emotion, negative self-thoughts). Individual measures of pulling, averaged across situations, exhibited high test reliability, construct validity, and content validity. Large differences between situations in pulling were observed, along with large individual-situation interactions (with limited evidence distinguishing focused versus automatic pulling subtypes). In linear regressions for individual participants, factors that influence pulling tended to correlate with pulling as predicted, explaining a median 74%-83% of its variance. By identifying factors that predict pulling for each individual across situations, the SAM<sup>2</sup> Trichotillomania Assessment Instrument (TAI) offers a rich understanding of an individual's pulling experience, potentially supporting individualized pulling interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241262140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241262140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring trichotillomania is essential for understanding and treating it effectively. Using the Situated Assessment Method (SAM2), we developed a psychometric instrument to assess hair pulling in situations where it occurs. In two studies, pullers evaluated their pulling in relevant situations, along with how much they experience factors that potentially influence it (e.g., external triggers, reduction in negative emotion, negative self-thoughts). Individual measures of pulling, averaged across situations, exhibited high test reliability, construct validity, and content validity. Large differences between situations in pulling were observed, along with large individual-situation interactions (with limited evidence distinguishing focused versus automatic pulling subtypes). In linear regressions for individual participants, factors that influence pulling tended to correlate with pulling as predicted, explaining a median 74%-83% of its variance. By identifying factors that predict pulling for each individual across situations, the SAM2 Trichotillomania Assessment Instrument (TAI) offers a rich understanding of an individual's pulling experience, potentially supporting individualized pulling interventions.

开发和评估针对毛手毛脚症的情境评估工具:SAM2 TAI。
测量拔毛症对于了解和有效治疗拔毛症至关重要。我们使用情境评估法(SAM2)开发了一种心理测量工具,用于评估在发生拔毛的情境中拔毛的情况。在两项研究中,拔毛者评估了他们在相关情境中的拔毛情况,以及他们经历了多少可能影响拔毛的因素(如外部诱因、负面情绪的减少、消极的自我想法)。拉力的单项测量结果在不同情境下的平均值显示出较高的测试可靠性、结构效度和内容效度。我们观察到不同情境下的拉力差异很大,同时个体与情境之间的相互作用也很大(区分集中拉力和自动拉力亚型的证据有限)。在对个体参与者的线性回归中,影响牵引力的因素往往与预测的牵引力相关,对牵引力变异的解释中位数为 74%-83%。通过识别预测每个人在不同情况下的牵拉行为的因素,SAM2 三体肌张力障碍评估工具(TAI)提供了对个人牵拉经历的丰富理解,从而为个性化的牵拉干预提供了潜在支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信