Associations of social engagement and loneliness with the progression and reversal of frailty: longitudinal investigations of 2 prospective cohorts from the UK and the USA.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ziyi Cai, Anna Olia Papacosta, Lucy T Lennon, Peter H Whincup, Sasiwarang Goya Wannamethee, Eleanor M Simonsick, John C Mathers, Sheena E Ramsay
{"title":"Associations of social engagement and loneliness with the progression and reversal of frailty: longitudinal investigations of 2 prospective cohorts from the UK and the USA.","authors":"Ziyi Cai, Anna Olia Papacosta, Lucy T Lennon, Peter H Whincup, Sasiwarang Goya Wannamethee, Eleanor M Simonsick, John C Mathers, Sheena E Ramsay","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social connections may impact the dynamic trajectory of frailty. Using data from the British Regional Heart Study (BRHS) in the UK (n = 715) and the US Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study (n = 1256), we conducted multinominal regression analyses to examine the association of baseline and change in social engagement and loneliness with progression to prefrailty and frailty, as well as their association with reversal to prefrailty and robust status among older adults. A higher level of social engagement at baseline (BRHS: relative risk ratio [RRR] 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; Health ABC: 0.56 [0.45-0.70]) and an increase in social engagement (BRHS: 0.73 [0.59-0.90]; Health ABC: 0.51 [0.41-0.63]) were associated with a lower risk of developing frailty. In BRHS, a higher level of loneliness at baseline (1.42 [1.10-1.83]) and an increase in loneliness (1.50 [1.18-1.90]) raised the risk of developing frailty. For reversal of frailty, higher social engagement at baseline (Health ABC: 1.63 [1.08-2.47]) and an increase in social engagement (BRHS: 1.74 [1.18-2.50]; Health ABC: 1.79 [1.17-.274]) were beneficial. Social connections may be potentially important and modifiable factors in both preventing and reversing progression of frailty in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"984-993"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social connections may impact the dynamic trajectory of frailty. Using data from the British Regional Heart Study (BRHS) in the UK (n = 715) and the US Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study (n = 1256), we conducted multinominal regression analyses to examine the association of baseline and change in social engagement and loneliness with progression to prefrailty and frailty, as well as their association with reversal to prefrailty and robust status among older adults. A higher level of social engagement at baseline (BRHS: relative risk ratio [RRR] 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; Health ABC: 0.56 [0.45-0.70]) and an increase in social engagement (BRHS: 0.73 [0.59-0.90]; Health ABC: 0.51 [0.41-0.63]) were associated with a lower risk of developing frailty. In BRHS, a higher level of loneliness at baseline (1.42 [1.10-1.83]) and an increase in loneliness (1.50 [1.18-1.90]) raised the risk of developing frailty. For reversal of frailty, higher social engagement at baseline (Health ABC: 1.63 [1.08-2.47]) and an increase in social engagement (BRHS: 1.74 [1.18-2.50]; Health ABC: 1.79 [1.17-.274]) were beneficial. Social connections may be potentially important and modifiable factors in both preventing and reversing progression of frailty in older adults.

社会参与和孤独感与虚弱的发展和逆转之间的关系:对英国和美国两个前瞻性队列的纵向调查。
背景:社会关系可能会影响虚弱的动态轨迹:社会关系可能会影响虚弱的动态轨迹:利用英国英国地区心脏研究(BRHS)(n = 715)和美国健康、衰老和身体成分(Health ABC)研究(n = 1256)的数据,我们进行了多项式回归分析,研究了基线和变化中的社会参与度和孤独感与老年人衰弱前和衰弱进展的关系,以及它们与老年人衰弱前和健壮状态逆转的关系:结果发现:基线社会参与度越高(BRHS:相对风险比(RRR)为 0.69 [95%CI 0.55-0.85];Health ABC:相对风险比(RRR)为 0.56 [0.45-0.850.56[0.45-0.70])以及社会参与度的提高(BRHS:0.73,[0.59-0.90];Health ABC:0.51[0.41-0.63])与罹患虚弱症的风险降低有关。在 BRHS 中,基线孤独程度越高(1.42 [1.10-1.83]),孤独程度越高(1.50 [1.18-1.90]),罹患虚弱的风险就越高。对于体弱的逆转,基线较高的社会参与度(健康ABC:1.63[1.08-2.47])和社会参与度的增加(BRHS:1.74[1.18-2.50];健康ABC:1.79[1.17-.274])是有益的:结论:社会关系可能是预防和逆转老年人体弱进展的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信