Development of LC-MS/MS method for quantification of Lurasidone using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS); a comparative study between dried blood and plasma samples

Abstract

The ecological impact of biological, chemical, and analytical research practices, including toxic reagents and biohazardous waste, has led to the development of alternative sampling and extraction techniques for bioanalysis. Microsampling (sample volume < 50 µL) aligns with the 3Rs principle, allowing multiple sampling points from the same animal at different time points and improving animal welfare. A bioanalytical method was developed to investigate factors related to bioanalytical challenges and the implementation of microsampling techniques. An LC-MS/MS method for Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS), 20 µL, was developed for quantifying Lurasidone using a liquid–liquid extraction technique. The method uses a C18, Phenomenex column for chromatographic separation and a mobile phase composition of Methanol, Acetonitrile, and Water with 0.1 % HFBA. The method was validated over a concentration range of 5.0 to 1200.0 ng/mL and achieved acceptable precision and accuracy. The recovery for analyte from VAMS was approximately 40% at four different concentrations and is consistent (%CV < 15), with no significant differences among HCT levels. The matrix factor ranged between 85.00 and 115.00 %, showing no substantial issues with reduced or enhanced signal. The stability data showed no significant degradation of LUR in VAMS samples when stored at room temperature for 15 days. The newly established method for Lurasidone confirmed the use of VAMS sampling method and its analysis on LC-MS/MS. Further, the data obtained from microsampling techniques was compared with conventional (plasma) technique, as proof-of-concept, and it confirms the agreement between the two methods. The study supports the advantages of microsampling in protecting the environment and animals while maintaining scientific judgement.